Cover not available
Part of
Talking about Food: The social and the global in eating communities
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Susanne Mühleisen
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 47] 2020
► pp. 99–122

Chapter 6
Craft beer and linguistic lifestyle emblematization

| University of Greifswald
| Leonore-Goldschmidt-Schule
Craft beer is currently a highly popular form of conspicuous consumption in many Western societies, including Germany. As such, the craft beer movement is a prime example of ‘lifestyle emblematization’: to partake in it is to be involved in the performance of exclusive and informed identities, a prerequisite for claims to social distinction. This study is grounded in ethnographic data from Berlin’s craft beer bars and complimentary data from the Upper Franconia region, which constitutes a peripheral space in terms of social geography yet doubles as a widely acclaimed center of German brewing traditions. By drawing on comparative data from these two differing sites, we can gain insight on discursive processes of lifestyle emblematization, and the specific role of Anglophone resources therein.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theorizing craft beer: Beer talk and lifestyle emblematization
  • 3.Sites of analysis and data
    • 3.1Sites of analysis
    • 3.2Data collected
  • 4.Anglophone and German resources in discourses of global/local exclusivity
    • 4.1English and German in Berlin
      • 4.1.1 Berliner Berg
      • 4.1.2 The Pier
      • 4.1.3 Vagabund Brauerei
    • 4.2German and English in Upper Franconia
  • 5.Talking craft beer into being: Discursivization processes
    • 5.1Talking about beer: Tasting terms and tasting notes
    • 5.2Metagraphematic awareness
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.47.06hey
References (20)
References
Blommaert, J. 2012. Lookalike language. English Today 28(2): 62–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohmann, A. 2010. “Red mal deutsch, Hundesohn, ich halt nicht viel vom spitten”: Cultural pressures and the language of German hip hop. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 58(3): 203–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Britain, D. 2016. Sedentarism and nomadism in the sociolinguistics of dialect. In Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates, N. Coupland (ed.), 217–241. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotter, W. M. & Valentinsson, M. C. 2018. Bivalent class indexing in the sociolinguistics of specialty coffee talk. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22(5): 489–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Depenbusch, L., Ehrich, M. & Pfizenmaier, U. 2018. Craft beer in Germany. New entries in a challenging beer market. In Economic Perspectives on Craft Beer, C. Garavaglia & J. Swinnen (eds), 183–210. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elzinga, K. G., Tremblay, C. H. & Tremblay, V. J. 2015. Craft beer in the United States: History, numbers, and geography. Journal of Wine Economics 10(3): 242–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. 2010. The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 101–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heyd, T. & Schneider, B. 2019. Anglophone practices in Berlin: From historical evidence to transnational communities. In English in the German-speaking World [Studies in English Language], R. Hickey (ed.), 143–164. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Heyd, T., Schneider, B. & von Mengden, F. (eds). 2019. The Sociolinguistic Economy of Berlin – Cosmopolitan Perspectives on Language, Diversity and Social Space [Language and Social Life 17]. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klotz, N. A. 2014. Was ist Craft Beer? <[URL]> (24 November 2019).
Lacoste, V., Leimgruber, J. & Breyer, T. (eds). 2014. Indexing Authenticity: Sociolinguistic Perspectives [Linguae & Litterae 39]. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liebesbier Website. n.d. <[URL]> (1 November 2019).
Mapes, G. 2018. (De)constructing distinction: Class inequality and elite authenticity in mediatized food discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22(3): 265–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. 2017. Banal cosmopolitanism. Language on the Move, 31 October 2017, <[URL]> (24 November 2019).Google Scholar
Shields-Argelès, C. 2018. Tasting Comté cheese, returning to the whole – The Jury Terroir as ritual practice. In Making Taste Public: Ethnographies of Food and the Senses, C. Counihan & S. Højlund (eds), 83–96. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3–4): 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spitzmüller, J., 2013. Graphische Variation als soziale Praxis: Eine soziolinguistische Theorie skripturaler ›Sichtbarkeit‹ [Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 56]. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. & Jaworski, A. 2017. Introducing elite discourse: The rhetorics of status, privilege, and power. Social Semiotics 27(3): 243–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veblen, T. 1899[1994]. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions [Penguin Twentieth-century Classics]New York NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar