Chapter in:
Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Aspects of Ethiopian Languages
Edited by Derib Ado, Almaz Wasse Gelagay and Janne Bondi Johannessen †
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 48] 2021

Durational variations in Oromo vowels

| Addis Ababa University
| Dembi Dolo University
An acoustic study of vowels of Cushitic languages has not been undertaken, though their vowels seem to exhibit durational variations. We wanted to identify factors that would affect vowel length in Oromo, a Cushitic language widely spoken in the Horn of Africa. Sixty-four speakers (F = 32, M = 32) from four dialect areas of the language in Ethiopia produced vowel data in different environments. An acoustic analysis of the data showed that duration of the vowels varies significantly across dialects, with the longest duration in the Eastern dialect and the shortest duration in the Western dialect. Gender has no significant effect on duration of the vowels, but the vowels have significantly longer duration when followed by voiced singletons than voiceless, and when followed by voiced singletons than by voiced geminates. Collectively, phonologically long vowels are two times longer than short ones, and this difference is significantly affected by dialect and environment, but not by gender. A significant variation was also observed among the vowels with regard to their intrinsic duration. It is concluded that, besides phonological length, the regional background of speakers and phonetic environment are key factors determining duration of Oromo vowels.
Keywords: Oromo, vowel, dialect, duration, environment, Cushitic
References

References

Aldubai, Nadhim Abdulamalek
2015 The impact of geminates on the duration of the preceding and following vowels in Ta’zi dialect. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) 6(1): 335–358.Google Scholar
Al-Tamimi, Jalal & Khattab, Ghada
2015 Acoustic cue weighting in the singleton vs geminate contrast in Lebanese Arabic: The case of fricative consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138(1): 344–360.Google Scholar
Aoyama, Katsura & Reid, Lawrence A.
2006 Cross-linguistic tendencies and durational contrasts in geminate consonants: An examination of Guinaang Bontok geminates. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36(2): 146–156.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E.
1982 Effects of accent on vowel duration in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 71: 23, 32.Google Scholar
Begus, Gasper
2017 Effects of ejective stops on preceding vowel duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142(4): 2168–2184.Google Scholar
Behne, D., Moxness, B. & Nyland, A.
1996 Acoustic-phonetic evidence acoustic-phonetic evidence in Norwegian. TMH-QPSR 37(2): 13–16.Google Scholar
Bender, M. Lionel, Mulugeta, Etefa & Stinson, D. Lloyd
1976 Two Cushitic languages. In Language in Ethiopia, M. Lionel Bender, J. Donald Bowen, R. L. Cooper & Charles A. Ferguson, 130–154. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Bender, M. Lionel
1971 Languages of Ethiopia. A new lexicostatistic classification and some problems of diffusion. Anthropological Linguistics 13(5): 165–288.Google Scholar
Blažek, Václav
2010 Glottochronological classification of Oromo dialects. Lingua Posnaniensis 52(2): 27–42.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2013 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer software]. http://​www​.fon​.hum​.uva​.nl​/praat/> (13 May 2013).
Bradlow, Ann R., Torretta, Gina M. & Pisoni, David B.
1996 Intelligibility of normal speech: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication 20(2): 255–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braunschweiler, Norbert
1997 Integrated cues of voicing and vowel length in German: A production study. Language and Speech 4(4): 353–376.Google Scholar
Catford, John C.
1977 Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G., Pisoni, David B. & de Jong, Kenneth
2005 Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118(3): 1661–1676.Google Scholar
de Jong, Kenneth
2004 Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: Patterns of variation in vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics 32: 493–516.Google Scholar
Dissassa, Melaku
1980 Some Aspects of Oromo Phonology. Lawrence KS: Kansas State University.Google Scholar
Dommergues, Jean-Yves
2007 Long and short vowels in Swiss French: Their production and perception. French Language Studies 17: 1–19.Google Scholar
Durisala, Naresh, Nambi, Arivudai & Batra, Ridhima
2011 Intelligibility and acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech in Telugu. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 63(2): 165–171.Google Scholar
Ericsdotter, Christine & Ericsson, Anna M.
2001 Gender differences in vowel duration in read Swedish: Preliminary results. Lund University Working Papers 49: 34–37.Google Scholar
Escudero, Paola, Boersma, Paul, Schurt Rauber, Andréia & Bion, Ricardo
2008 A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese. PACS number(s): 43.70.Fq, 43.70.Kv, 43.72.Ar 1–23. https://​www​.fon​.hum​.uva​.nl​/paul​/papers​/BPEP​_vowels64​_pic​.pdf> (19 August 2020).
Feda, Negesse
2015 Classification of Oromo dialects: A computational approach. International Journal of Computational Linguistics 6(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Fox, Robert A. & Jacewicz, Ewa
2009 Cross-dialectal variation in fomant dynamics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126(5): 2603–2618.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew
2016 Phonological Typology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Lagefoged, Peter
2001 Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29: 383–406.Google Scholar
Gragg, Gen
1976 Oromo of Wollega. In The Non-Semitic Language of Ethiopia, M. Lionel Bender (ed.), 166–195. Lansing MI: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Hajek, John & Stevens, Mary
2008 Vowel duration, compression and lengthening in stressed syllables in Central and Southern varieties of standard Italian. In Interspeech, 22–26 September, 516–519. Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1981 The Waata dialect of Oromo. Grammatical sketch and vocabulary. In Language and Dialect Atlas of Kenya, Vol. 1: Geographical and Historical Introduction: Language and Society, Selected Bibliography, Bernd Heine & Wilhelm J. G. Möhlig. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, James, Getty, Laura A., Clark, Michael J. & Wheeler, Kimberlee
1995 Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(5), Pt. 1, 97(5): 3099–3111.Google Scholar
Hirata, Yukari
2004 Relational acoustic invariance in Japanese vowel length distinction. From Sound to Sense 11–13 June 2004, MIT.Google Scholar
Hoequist Jr., Charles
1983 Syllable duration in stress-syllable- and mora-timed languages. Phonetica 40: 203–237.Google Scholar
Holt, Yolanda F., Jacewicz, Ewa & Fox, Robert Allen
2015 Variation in vowel duration among southern African American English speakers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 24: 460–469.Google Scholar
Homma, Yayoi
1981 Durational relationship between Japanese stops and vowels. Journal of Phonetics 9: 273–281.Google Scholar
Idemaru, Kaori & Guion, Susan G.
2008 Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 38(2): 167–186.Google Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa, Fox, Robert Allen & Salmons, Joseph
2007 Vowel duration in three American English dialects. American Speech 82(4): 367–385.Google Scholar
2011 Regional dialect variation in the vowel systems of typically. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research 54 (2): 448–470.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith & Martin, Jack
2001 Acoustic vowel reduction in Creek: Effects of distinctive length and position in the word. Phonetica 58: 81–102.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto & Braver, Aaron
2014 Durational properties of emphatically lengthened consonants in Japanese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 44(3): 138–260.Google Scholar
Kaye, Alan S.
2005 Gemination in English. English Today 21(2): 43–55.Google Scholar
Kebede, Hordofa
2009 Towards the Genetic Classification of the Afaan Oromoo Dialects. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Kong, Qing-Ming
1987 Influence of tones upon vowel duration in Cantonese. Language and Speech 30(4): 387–399.Google Scholar
Kukkonen, P.
1990 Patterns of Phonological Disturbances in Adult Aphasia. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Lippus, Partel, Asu, Eva. L., Teras, Pire & Tuisk, Tuuli
2013 Quantity-related variation of duration, pitch and vowel quality in spontaneous Estonian. Journal of Phonetics 41: 17–28.Google Scholar
Liu, Chang, Jin, Su-Hyun & Chen, Chia-Tsen
2014 Durations of American English vowels by native and non-native speakers: Acoustic analyses and perceptual effects. Language and Speech 57(2): 238–253.Google Scholar
Lloret, Maria-Rosa
1988 Gemination and Vowel Length in Oromo Morphophonology. PhD dissertation, University of Indiana at Bloomington.Google Scholar
Luce, Paul A. & Charles-Luce, Jan
1985 Contextual effects on vowel duration, closure duration, and the consonant/vowel ratio in speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 78(6): 1949–1957.Google Scholar
Mayr, Robert & Davies, Hannah
2011 A cross-dialectal acoustic study of the monophthongs and diphthongs of Welsh. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
McClure, J. Derrick
1977 Vowel duration in a Scottish accent. Journal of International Phonetic Association 7(1): 10–16.Google Scholar
Most, Tova, Amir, Offer & Tobin, Yishai
2000 The Hebrew vowel system: Raw and normalised acoustic data. Language and Speech 43(3): 295–308.Google Scholar
Owens, Jonathan
1985 A Grammar of Harar Oromo [Cushitic Language Studies 4]. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Payne, Elinor M.
2005 Phonetic variation in Italian consonant gemination. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35(2): 153–84.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Salmons, Joseph, Tepeli, Dilara & Mercer, Jennifer
2005 Structured heterogeneity and change in laryngeal phonetics: Upper Midwestern final obstruents. Journal of English Linguistics 33(4): 307–338.Google Scholar
Rolle, Nicholas
2009 The Phonetic Nature of Niuean Vowel Length [Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics (TWPL)]. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Rosner, B. S. & Pickering, John Brian
1995 Vowel Perception and Production. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Schoormann, Heike E., Heeringa, Wilbert J. & Peters, Jorg
2017 A cross-dialectal acoustic study of Saterland Frisian vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141(4): 2893–2908.Google Scholar
Stroomer, Harry
1995 A Grammar of Borana Oromo (Kenya). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Tjaden, Kris, Richards, Emily, Kuo, Christina, Wilding, Greg & Sussman, Joan
2014 Acoustic and perceptual consequences of clear and loud speech. Folia Phoniatr Logop 65: 214–220.Google Scholar
Tsukada, Kimiko
2009 An acoustic comparison of vowel length contrasts in Arabic, Japanese and Thai: Durational and spectral data. International Journal on Asian Language Processing 19(4): 127–138.Google Scholar
Velayudhan, S. & Howie, John M.
1974 Acoustical measurements of distinctive vowel quantity in Malayalam. Language and Speech 17(1): 95–102.Google Scholar
Wako, Tola
1981 The Phonology of Mecha Oromo. MA thesis, Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar
Wang, Youfa & Chen, Hsin Jen
2012 Use of percentile and Z-scores in anthropometry. In Handbook of Anthropometry: Physical Measures of Human Form in Health and Disease, by Victor R. Preedy (ed.), 29–48. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Wayland, Ratree
1997 Non-native production of Thai: Acoustic non-native production of Thai: Acoustic. Applied Linguistics 18(3): 345–373.Google Scholar
Wedekind, Klaus
1989 Status and dynamics of Ethiopian vowel systems. Journal of Ethiopian Studies 22: 105–172.Google Scholar
Williams, Daniel & Escudero, Paola
2014 A cross-dialectal acoustic comparison of vowels in Northern and Southern British English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 13 (5): 2751–2761.Google Scholar