Chapter published in:
Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Aspects of Ethiopian Languages
Edited by Derib Ado, Almaz Wasse Gelagay and Janne Bondi Johannessen †
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 48] 2021
► pp. 389–412

Polysemy of Ethiopian sign language

| Addis Ababa University
The purpose of this study was to examine cases of polysemous signs in Ethiopian Sign Language (hereafter ethsl). There are various processes of forming polysemy in sign language. To carry out this study, data was collected from users of sign language in Addis Ababa and Hossana by means of direct elicitation, video recording and analysis of ethsl dictionaries. The data showed some cases of polysemy through meaning extension as well as other occurrences of polysemy. A qualitative descriptive method was used to describe the polysemous signs in ethsl. The article describes different cases of initiating semantic extension processes, such as action vs. result of activity, noun vs. verb, systematic meaning relations, such as animal vs. meat, and generality. Also borrowings from oral language and other sign languages are found. One aim of this study is to contribute new knowledge about how polysemous signs in ethsl are extended/derived, as well as accounts for the process of meaning extension. This study will be useful for lexicographers of sign language dictionaries, as well as for second-language learners of sign language.
Keywords: lexical semantics, polysemy, polysemous signs
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The history of the Ethiopian Sign Language
  • 3.Conceptual framework
    • 3.1Conceptual theories that relate to polysemy in lexical meaning
    • 3.2Distinguishing polysemy from other lexical semantic relations
    • 3.3Notions of polysemy in sign language
  • 4.Research method
    • 4.1Direct elicitation
    • 4.2Observations
    • 4.3Video recording
    • 4.4 ethsl dictionary analysis
  • 5.Research findings
    • 5.1Different cases of polysemy in EthSL
    • 5.2The process of developing derivative polysemous signs in EthSL
      • a.Metonymically motivated EthSL polysemous signs
      • b.Metaphorically motivated polysemous EthSL signs
      • c.Polysemous EthSL signs originated from semantic borrowing from foreign languages
      • d.Iconically motivated polysemous EthSL signs
    • 5.3Discussion of polysemy in EthSL dictionaries and in the studied material
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 23 April 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.48.16gir
References
Apresjan, J. D.
(1974) Regular polysemy. Linguistics, 12(142). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cokely, Dennis
2014 Interpreting Culturally Rich Realities: Research Implications for Successful Interpretations. Rochester NY: RIT Publishing.Google Scholar
Copestake, Anne & Briscoe, Ted
1996 Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. In Lexical Semantics. The Problem of Polysemy, James Pustejovsky & Branimir Boguraev (eds), 15–67. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Sloetjes, Han
2008 Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. In Proceedings of LREC 2008, Marrakech.Google Scholar
Dikyuva, Hasan, Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar & Arık, Engin
2017 Turkish Sign Language Grammar. Ankara: Ministry of Family and Social Policies Press.Google Scholar
Ethiopian National Association of the Deaf
2008 Birtat. Addis Ababa: Artistic Printing Press.Google Scholar
Ethiopian National Association for the Deaf (ENAD)
2008 Ethiopian Sign Language Dictionary. Addis Ababa: Artistic Printing Enterprise.Google Scholar
Ethiopian National Association of the Deaf (ENAD)
1976 ሀ የአማርኛ ምልክት ቋንቋ መፅሃፍ. Birhan ena Selam Printing Press.Google Scholar
Eyasu Hailu Tamene
2017 The Sociolinguistics of Ethiopian Sign Language: A Study of Language Use and Attitudes. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria
1992 An Introduction to Language, 4th edn. Raleigh NC: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Schembri, Adam
2007 Australian Sign Language: An Introduction to Sign Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidane Admasu
(2013) Compound Signs in Ethiopian Sign Language. Unpublished MA thesis, Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar
Klepousniotou, Ekaterini
2002 The processing of lexical ambiguity: Homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language 81(1–3): 205–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul
(ed.) 2009 Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 6th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International. http://​www​.ethnologue​.com> (20 August 2011).
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics, Vol.1. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Naughton, Karen
2001 Linguistic Description and Analysis of Verb of Visual Perception in American Sign Language (ASL). PhD dissertation. University of New Mexico at Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
(1979) Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1996 The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Riemer, Nick
2010 Introducing Semantics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saeed, John I.
1997 Semantics. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schilling, Natalie
2013 Sociolinguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, William C., Casterline, Dorothy C. & Cronberg, Carl G.
1965 A Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistic Principles. Silver Spring MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Stokoe, William C.
1960 Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf [Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers 8]. Buffalo NY: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
Supalla, T., & Newport, E.
1978 “How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language.” In P. Siple (ed.), Understanding Language through Sign Language Research. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taub, S.
2001 Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valli, C., Lucas, C., & Mulrooney, K. J.
2005 Linguistics of American Sign Language: A Resource Text for ASL Users (4th edn.). Washington, DC: GallaudetUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Wrigley, O., et al.
1990 The Sign Language Dictionary. Revised and Expanded Edition. Bangkok: National Association of the Deaf in Thailand.Google Scholar