Article published In:
InterpretingVol. 21:2 (2019) ► pp.270–304
Expectations vs. experience
Attitudes towards video remote conference interpreting
The attitudes of interpreters providing video remote conference interpreting during the 2014 FIFA World Cup™ was analyzed using a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative and qualitative data pertaining to six deductive categories (general and specific attitudes towards remote interpreting, attitudes towards the work environment and the workspace, psychological and physiological wellbeing) were collected. Online questionnaires were completed both before and after the event and structured interviews were conducted on site during the event. Triangulation of results corroborates the technical feasibility of video remote interpreting, whilst highlighting aspects with a high potential to shape interpreters’ attitudes towards it. The quality of the technical team on site along with the availability of visual input in the entire conference room (including all speakers taking the floor) is key to offsetting the feeling of alienation or lack of immersion experienced by interpreters working with this technical setup. Suggestions for the improvement of key parameters are provided.
Keywords: remote interpreting, attitudes, workspace, wellbeing, immersion
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 3.Research methodology
- 3.1Research questions
- 3.2Design
- 3.3Instruments and protocols
- 3.4Population and sample
- 3.5Ethical considerations
- 3.6Data analysis and reporting
- 4.Setting
- 4.1Event structure and language needs
- 4.2RI room and booth configuration
- 4.3RI technical specifications
- 5.Results
- 5.1General attitudes towards remote interpreting
- 5.2General attitudes towards travel
- 5.3Physiological wellbeing
- 5.4Psychological wellbeing
- 5.5Work environment
- 5.5.1Mobility, safety and security
- 5.5.2Amenities, work schedule and down time
- 5.6Workspace – technical aspects
- 5.6.1Expectations
- 5.6.2Actual experience, likes and dislikes
- 5.6.3Suggested improvements
- 5.7Workspace – social and psychological aspects
- 5.7.1Being there
- 5.8Attitudes towards remote interpreting at the World Cup™ in Rio
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1How interpreters generally view video remote conference interpreting
- 6.2How interpreters view remote interpreting at the 2014 FIFA World Cup™
- 6.3How interpreters experience the RI work environment
- 6.4How interpreters experience the RI workspace
- 6.5How interpreters experience their psychological and physiological wellbeing
- 7.Conclusions
- Disclosure and acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
References
Agarwal, R. & Karahanna, E.
(2000) Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24 (4), 665–694. 
AIIC
n.d.). AIIC Workload Surveys. [URL] (accessed 15 December 2016).
Azarmina, P. & Wallace, P.
(2005) Remote interpretation in medical encounters: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 111, 140–145.
Baigorri-Jalón, J.
Braun, S.
(2013) Keep your distance? Remote interpreting in legal proceedings: A critical assessment of a growing practice. Interpreting 15 (2), 200–228.
(2015) Remote interpreting. In H. Mikkelson & R. Jourdenais (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of interpreting. New York: Routledge, 352–367.
Braun, S. & Taylor, J.
(2015) Advances in videoconferencing and interpreting in legal proceedings. Antwerp: Intersentia.
Brown, J. D.
(2011) Likert items and scales of measurement. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter 15 (1), 10–14.
Chou, T. J. & Ting, C. C.
(2003) The role of flow experience in cyber-game addiction. Cyber Psychology and Behavior 6 (6), 663–675.
Constable, A.
forthcoming). Distance interpreting: A Nuremberg moment for our times. In H. Salaets & G. Brône Eds. Linking up with video: Perspectives on interpreting practice and research Amsterdam Benjamins
Crano, W. D. & Prislin, R.
(2006) Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology 571, 345–374.
Creswell, J. W.
(2003) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ermi, L. & Mäyrä, F.
(2005) Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analyzing immersion. In S. Castell & J. Jenson (Eds.), Changing views: Worlds in play. Selected Papers of the 2005 Digital Games Research Association’s Second International Conference. Tampere: Digital Games Research Association, 15–27.
Harris, L. R. & Brown, G. T. L.
(2010) Mixing interview and questionnaire methods: Practical problems in aligning data. Practical assessment, research and evaluation 15 (1), 1–19.
Jamieson, S.
(2004) Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education 381, 1212–1218.
Jones, D., Gill, P., Harrison, R., Meakin, R. & Wallace, P.
(2003) An exploratory study of language interpretation services provided by videoconferencing. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 91, 51–56.
Locatis, C., Williamson, D., Gould-Kabler, C., Zone-Smith, L., Detzler, I., Roberson, Maisiak R. & Ackerman, M.
(2010) Comparing in-person, video, and telephonic medical interpretation. Journal of General Internal Medicine 25 (4), 345–350.
Mertens-Hoffman Management Consultants
(2005) Final report on the December 2004 remote interpreting test at the European Parliament. Unpublished report.
Moser-Mercer, B.
(2003) Remote interpreting: assessment of human factors and performance parameters. Communicate! Summer 2003 [URL] (accessed 15 December 2016).
(2005) Remote interpreting: Issues of multi-sensory integration in a multilingual task. Meta 50 (2), 727–738.
Mouzourakis, P.
(2003) That feeling of being there: vision and presence in remote interpreting. Communicate! Summer 2003 [URL] (accessed 15 December 2016).
(2006) Remote interpreting: A technical perspective on recent experiments. Interpreting 8 (1), 45–66.
Price, E., Pérez-Stable, E., Nickleach, D., Lopez, M. & Karliner, L.
(2012) Interpreter perspectives of in-person, telephonic, and videoconferencing medical interpretations in clinical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling 87 (2), 226–232.
Roziner, I. & Shlesinger, M.
(2010) Much ado about something remote: Stress and performance in remote interpreting. Interpreting 12 (2), 214–247.
Seeber, K. G.
(2015) Simultaneous interpreting. In H. Mikkelson & R. Jourdenais (Eds.), Routledge handbook of interpreting. Oxon/New York: Routledge, 79–95.
(2017) Multimodal processing in simultaneous interpreting. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The handbook of translation and cognition. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley and Sons, 461–475.
UNESCO
(1976) A teleconference experiment. A report on the experimental use of the Symphonie satellite to link UNESCO Headquarters in Paris with the Conference Centre in Nairobi. Paris: UNESCO.
Verplanken, B., Hofstee, G. & Janssen, H. J. W.
(1998) Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology 281, 23–35.
Cited by
Cited by 24 other publications
Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.
2020. Researching Professional Translator/Interpreter Experiences and Roles. In Translator and Interpreter Education Research [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 125 ff. 
Buján, Marta & Camille Collard
2022. Remote Simultaneous Interpreting and COVID-19: Conference Interpreters’ Perspective. In Translation and Interpreting in the Age of COVID-19 [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 9], ► pp. 133 ff.
Cheung, Andrew K. F.
2022. Remote Simultaneous Interpreting from Home or Hub: Accuracy of Numbers from English into Mandarin Chinese. In Translation and Interpreting in the Age of COVID-19 [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 9], ► pp. 113 ff.
Chmiel, Agnieszka & Nicoletta Spinolo
2022. Testing the impact of remote interpreting settings on interpreter experience and performance. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 5:2 ► pp. 250 ff.
Corpas Pastor, Gloria & Fernando Sánchez Rodas
2021. Chapter 1. Now what?. In Corpora in Translation and Contrastive Research in the Digital Age [Benjamins Translation Library, 158], ► pp. 23 ff.
Defrancq, Bart
2023. Chapter 12. Technology in interpreter education and training. In Interpreting Technologies – Current and Future Trends [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 37], ► pp. 302 ff.
Defrancq, Bart & Gloria Corpas Pastor
2023. Introduction. In Interpreting Technologies – Current and Future Trends [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 37], ► pp. 1 ff.
Diur, Marie & Lucía Ruiz Rosendo
2022. Reconceptualising Interpreting at the United Nations. In Translation and Interpreting in the Age of COVID-19 [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 9], ► pp. 151 ff.
Feng, Cheng, S. Zhu, Y. Chen & J. Liang
2023. Studies on Global Remote Interpreting: A PRISMA Systematic Review. SHS Web of Conferences 162 ► pp. 01031 ff.
Giustini, Deborah
2022. COVID-19 and the Configuration of Materiality in Remote Interpreting: Is Technology Biting Back?. In Translation and Interpreting in the Age of COVID-19 [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 9], ► pp. 197 ff.
Hale, Sandra, Jane Goodman-Delahunty, Natalie Martschuk & Julie Lim
2022. Does interpreter location make a difference?. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 24:2 ► pp. 221 ff.
Hernández Bella, Olivia
2023. Estresores derivados de la interpretación simultánea remota: el foro de discusión como herramienta de identificación en la formación. redit - Revista Electrónica de Didáctica de la Traducción y la Interpretación :17 ► pp. 93 ff.
Jayes, Thomas
2023. Chapter 9. Conference interpreting and technology. In Interpreting Technologies – Current and Future Trends [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 37], ► pp. 217 ff.
Krasnopeyeva, E. S.
2021. Distance Interpreting: Terminology, Taxonomy, and Key Directions of Research. Nauchnyi dialog :11 ► pp. 143 ff.
Melicherčíková, Miroslava & Soňa Hodáková
2023. Prieniky a odlišnosti v kognitívno-osobnostnom profile a tlmočníckom výkone profesionálov a študentov,
Mellinger, Christopher D.
2023. Chapter 8. Embedding, extending, and distributing interpreter cognition with technology. In Interpreting Technologies – Current and Future Trends [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 37], ► pp. 195 ff.
Pöchhacker, Franz
2022. Interpreters and interpreting: shifting the balance?. The Translator 28:2 ► pp. 148 ff.
Pöchhacker, Franz
2023. Pioneering interpreting studies. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 25:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Russo, Mariachiara, Emilia Iglesias Fernández & Sabine Braun
2020. Introduction. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 14:3 ► pp. 235 ff.
Saeed, Muhammad Ahmed, Eloy Rodríguez González, Tomasz Korybski, Elena Davitti & Sabine Braun
2022. Connected yet Distant: An Experimental Study into the Visual Needs of the Interpreter in Remote Simultaneous Interpreting. In Human-Computer Interaction. User Experience and Behavior [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13304], ► pp. 214 ff.
Salaets, Heidi & Katalin Balogh
2023. Are interpreters and interpreting technology ready for the post-Covid era?. In Introducing New Hypertexts on Interpreting (Studies) [Benjamins Translation Library, 160], ► pp. 254 ff.
Spinolo, Nicoletta & Ricardo Muñoz Martín
2022. Experiential learning for the remote interpreting classroom. In Re-Thinking Translator Education [Sprachen lehren – Sprachen lernen, ], ► pp. 193 ff.
Zhu, Xuelian & Vahid Aryadoust
2022. A Synthetic Review of Cognitive Load in Distance Interpreting: Toward an Explanatory Model. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Zhu, Yuben
2022. Exploring booth-mates’ teamwork in the time of a pandemic: A case study. Across Languages and Cultures 23:2 ► pp. 206 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.