Article published in:
Vol. 21:2 (2019) ► pp. 270304

[ p. 302 ]References

Agarwal, R. & Karahanna, E.
(2000) Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24 (4), 665–694. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(n.d.). AIIC Workload Surveys. https://​aiic​.net​/surveys​/findings/ (accessed 15 December 2016).
Azarmina, P. & Wallace, P.
(2005) Remote interpretation in medical encounters: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 11, 140–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baigorri-Jalón, J.
(2014) From Paris to Nuremberg: The birth of conference interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braun, S.
(2013) Keep your distance? Remote interpreting in legal proceedings: A critical assessment of a growing practice. Interpreting 15 (2), 200–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Remote interpreting. In H. Mikkelson & R. Jourdenais (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of interpreting. New York: Routledge, 352–367.Google Scholar
Braun, S. & Taylor, J.
(2015) Advances in videoconferencing and interpreting in legal proceedings. Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D.
(2011) Likert items and scales of measurement. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter 15 (1), 10–14.Google Scholar
Chou, T. J. & Ting, C. C.
(2003) The role of flow experience in cyber-game addiction. Cyber Psychology and Behavior 6 (6), 663–675. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Constable, A.
(forthcoming). Distance interpreting: A Nuremberg moment for our times. In H. Salaets & G. Brône Eds. Linking up with video: Perspectives on interpreting practice and research. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Crano, W. D. & Prislin, R.
(2006) Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology 57, 345–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W.
(2003) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Ermi, L. & Mäyrä, F.
(2005) Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analyzing immersion. In S. Castell & J. Jenson (Eds.), Changing views: Worlds in play. Selected Papers of the 2005 Digital Games Research Association’s Second International Conference. Tampere: Digital Games Research Association, 15–27.Google Scholar
Harris, L. R. & Brown, G. T. L.
(2010) Mixing interview and questionnaire methods: Practical problems in aligning data. Practical assessment, research and evaluation 15 (1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Jamieson, S.
(2004) Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education 38, 1212–1218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D., Gill, P., Harrison, R., Meakin, R. & Wallace, P.
(2003) An exploratory study of language interpretation services provided by videoconferencing. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 9, 51–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locatis, C., Williamson, D., Gould-Kabler, C., Zone-Smith, L., Detzler, I., Roberson, Maisiak R. & Ackerman, M.
(2010) Comparing in-person, video, and telephonic medical interpretation. Journal of General Internal Medicine 25 (4), 345–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mertens-Hoffman Management Consultants
(2005) Final report on the December 2004 remote interpreting test at the European Parliament. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
[ p. 303 ]
Moser-Mercer, B.
(2003) Remote interpreting: assessment of human factors and performance parameters. Communicate! Summer 2003 http://​www​.aiic​.net​/ViewPage​.cfm​/article879​.htm (accessed 15 December 2016).
(2005) Remote interpreting: Issues of multi-sensory integration in a multilingual task. Meta 50 (2), 727–738. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mouzourakis, P.
(1996) Videoconferencing: Techniques and challenges. Interpreting 1 (1), 21–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) That feeling of being there: vision and presence in remote interpreting. Communicate! Summer 2003 https://​aiic​.net​/page​/1173 (accessed 15 December 2016).
(2006) Remote interpreting: A technical perspective on recent experiments. Interpreting 8 (1), 45–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Price, E., Pérez-Stable, E., Nickleach, D., Lopez, M. & Karliner, L.
(2012) Interpreter perspectives of in-person, telephonic, and videoconferencing medical interpretations in clinical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling 87 (2), 226–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roziner, I. & Shlesinger, M.
(2010) Much ado about something remote: Stress and performance in remote interpreting. Interpreting 12 (2), 214–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seeber, K. G.
(2015) Simultaneous interpreting. In H. Mikkelson & R. Jourdenais (Eds.), Routledge handbook of interpreting. Oxon/New York: Routledge, 79–95.Google Scholar
(2017) Multimodal processing in simultaneous interpreting. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The handbook of translation and cognition. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley and Sons, 461–475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1976) A teleconference experiment. A report on the experimental use of the Symphonie satellite to link UNESCO Headquarters in Paris with the Conference Centre in Nairobi. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Verplanken, B., Hofstee, G. & Janssen, H. J. W.
(1998) Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology 28, 23–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 304 ]