Article published in:
Interpreting
Vol. 23:1 (2021) ► pp. 76–102

Reading patterns and cognitive processing in an eye-tracking study of note-reading in consecutive interpreting

| Southwest University
| Macquarie University
| University of New South Wales
This article reports on the eye-tracking data collected from 18 professional interpreters while they performed consecutive interpreting with notes. It is a pioneering study in its visualisation of the way in which note-reading occurs. Preliminary evidence suggests that note-reading proceeds in a nonlinear manner. The data collected in this study also report on indicators of cognitive processing in consecutive interpreting, particularly during note-reading, which appears to be a cognitively demanding process. It differs from reading for comprehension in various ways, while staying closer to reading in sight translation. In addition, the data show that the note-taking choices made during Phase I of consecutive interpreting, in which interpreters listen to the source speech and write notes, affect the level of cognitive load in Phase II, in which interpreters read back their notes and produce a target speech.
Keywords: consecutive interpreting, eye tracking, note-reading, cognitive processing
Published online: 09 November 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00050.che
References

References

Albl-Mikasa, M.
(2008) (Non-)sense in note-taking for consecutive interpreting. Interpreting 10 (2), 197–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Notation language and notation text: A cognitive-linguistic model of consecutive interpreting. In Y. Somcya (Ed.), Consecutive notetaking and interpreter training. London/New York: Routledge, 71–117.Google Scholar
Andres, D.
(2002) Konsekutivdolmetschen und Notation [Consecutive interpreting and note-taking]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2015) Consecutive interpreting. In F. Pöchhacker (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies. London/New York: Routledge, 84–87.Google Scholar
Booth, R. W. & Weger, U. W.
(2013) The function of regressions in reading: Backward eye movements allow rereading. Memory & Cognition 41, 82–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carl, M. & Kay, M.
(2011) Gazing and typing activities during translation: A comparative study of translation units of professional and student translators. Meta 56 (4), 952–975. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S.
(2016) Note-taking in consecutive interpreting: A review with special focus on Chinese-English literature. The Journal of Specialised Translation 26, 151–171.Google Scholar
(2017a) The construct of cognitive load in interpreting and its measurement. Perspectives 25 (4), 640–657. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Note-taking in consecutive interpreting: New data from pen recording. Translation and Interpreting 9 (1), 4–23.Google Scholar
(2020) The process of note-taking in consecutive interpreting: A digital pen recording approach. Interpreting 22 (1), 117–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dam, H. V.
(2004a) Interpreters’ notes: On the choice of form and language. In G. Hansen, K. Malmkjær & D. Gile (Eds.), Claims, changes and challenges in Translation Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 251–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004b) Interpreters’ notes: On the choice of language. Interpreting 6 (1), 3–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Consecutive interpreting. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of translation studies: Volume 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 75–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., Reingold, E. M. & Davidson, M.
(1995) Time course of phonological activation during reading: Evidence from eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (4), 884–898.Google Scholar
Doherty, S., O’Brien, S. & Carl, M.
(2010) Eye tracking as an MT evaluation technique. Machine Translation 24 (1), 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dragsted, B.
(2010) Coordination of reading and writing processes in translation: An eye on uncharted territory. In G. M. Shreve & E. Angelone (Eds.), Translation and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 41–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Indicators of difficulty in translation: Correlating product and process data. Across Languages and Cultures 13 (1), 81–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dragsted, B. & Hansen, I. G.
(2009) Exploring translation and interpreting hybrids. The case of sight translation. Meta 54 (3), 588–604. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frisson, S. & Pickering, M. J.
(1999) The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition 25 (6), 1366–1383.Google Scholar
Gautier, V., O’Regan, J. K. & Le Gargasson, J. F.
(2000) ‘The skipping’ revisited in French: Programming saccades to skip the article ‘les’. Vision Research 40, 2517–2531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, A.
(2005) Note-taking for consecutive interpreting: A short course. Manchester/Kinderhook: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H. & van de Weijer, J.
(2011) Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huey, E. B.
(1908) The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hvelplund, K. T.
(2017) Eye tracking in translation process research. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The handbook of translation and cognition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 248–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F., Jr & Rinck, M.
(2003) Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 313–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inhoff, A. W. & Radach, R.
(1998) Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception. Oxford: Elsevier, 29–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, D. E.
(2001) Eye movements and perception. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 5208–5210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, A. L. & Jensen, K. T. H.
(2008) Eye movement behaviour across four different types of reading task. In S. Göpferich, A. L. Jakobsen & I. M. Mees (Eds). Looking at eyes: Eye-tracking studies of reading and translation processing. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 103–122.Google Scholar
Jensen, K. T. H., Sjørup, A. C. & Balling, L. W.
(2009) Effects of L1 syntax on L2 translation. In I. M. Mees, F. Alves & S. Göpferich (Eds.), Methodology, technology and innovation in translation process research: A tribute to Arnt Lykke Jakobsen. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 319–336.Google Scholar
Jones, R.
(2002) Conference interpreting explained. (2nd ed.). Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A.
(1980) A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 87 (4), 329–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaakinen, J. K. & Hyönä, J.
(2010) Task effects on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology 36 (6), 1561–1566.Google Scholar
Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B. & Pickering, M. J.
(1998) Eye movements and measures of reading time. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception. Oxford: Elsevier, 55–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murray, W. S.
(2000) Sentence processing: Issues and measures. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process. Oxford: Elsevier, 649–664. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orlando, M.
(2010) Digital pen technology and consecutive interpreting: Another dimension in note-taking training and assessment. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 15, 71–86.Google Scholar
Pöchhacker, F.
(2016) Introducing interpreting studies (2nd edition). London/New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollatsek, A. & Rayner, K.
(1990) Eye movements and lexical access in reading. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 143–164.Google Scholar
Pynte, J.
(1996) Lexical control of within-word eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (4), 958–969.Google Scholar
Rayner, K.
(1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124 (3), 372–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C. & Raney, G. E.
(1996) Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22, 1188–1200.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J. & Drieghe, D.
(2011) Eye movements and word skipping during reading: Effects of word length and predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 37 (2), 514–528.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R. & Clifton, C., Jr
(1989) Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 4 (3–4), SI21–SI49.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, M., Dragsted, B., Hvelplund, K. T., Balling, L. W. & Carl, M.
(2016) Word translation entropy: Evidence of early target language activation during reading for translation. In M. Carl, S. Bangalore & M. Schaeffer (Eds.), New directions in empirical translation process research: Exploring the CRITT TPR-DB. Cham: Springer, 183–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmauder, A. R.
(1992) Eye movements and reading processes. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading. New York: Springer, 369–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Setton, R. & Dawrant, A.
(2016) Conference interpreting: A trainer’s guide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shreve, G. M., Lacruz, I. & Angelone, E.
(2010) Cognitive effort, syntactic disruption, and visual interference in a sight translation task. In G. M. Shreve & E. Angelone (Eds.), Translation and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 63–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sjørup, A. C.
(2008) Metaphor comprehension in translation: Methodological issues in a pilot study. In S. Göpferich, A. L. Jakobsen & I. M. Mees (Eds.), Looking at eyes: Eye-tracking studies of reading and translation processing. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 53–77.Google Scholar
Sturt, P.
(2007) Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery. Cognition 105 (2), 477–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S.
(2007) Using multivariate statistics (5th edition). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar