Review published In:
Interpreting
Vol. 13:2 (2011) ► pp.251257
References
Cronin, Michael
(2002) The Empire talks back: Orality, heteronomy and the cultural turn in interpreting studies. In F. Pöchhacker & M. Shlesinger (Eds.), The interpreting studies reader. London/New York: Routledge, 386–397.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Ezequiel
(2005) Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciencies 51, 429–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diriker, Ebru
Lincoln, Yvonna S. & Guba, Egon G.
(1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maturana, Humberto
(2002) Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 91, 5–34.Google Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz
(2009) Conference interpreting: Surveying the profession. In R. Sela-Sheffy & M. Shlesinger (Eds.), Profession, identity and status: Translators and interpreters as an occupational group. Special issue of Translation and Interpreting Studies 4 (2), 172–186.Google Scholar
Poerksen, Bernhard
(2004) The certainty of uncertainty: Dialogues introducing constructivism. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Vohs, Kathleen D. & Baumeister, Roy F.
(2004) Understanding self-regulation: An introduction. In R. F. Baumeister & Kathleen D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press, 1–10.Google Scholar