Article published In:
InterpretingVol. 6:2 (2004) ► pp.117–142
Interpreting omissions
A new perspective
This paper discusses findings of a study conducted on Australian Sign Language (Auslan)/English interpreters in a university lecture, with consideration given to factors that influenced the interpreters’ omissions. The hypothesis of the study was that interpreters would make recourse to omissions both consciously and unconsciously, depending on their familiarity with the discourse environment and the subject matter. Through exploration of theoretical perspectives of interpreting and discourse studies, it is argued that interpreters use omissions as linguistic strategies for coping with the discourse environment. The findings of the study present interpreters with a new perspective on omissions in interpreting, which can be applied to both signed- and spoken-language interpreting.
Cited by (34)
Cited by 34 other publications
Gviniashvili, Zhuzhuna
2024. The life experiences of deaf Georgian students during the COVID-19 lockdowns: A time of quiet waiting. Deafness & Education International ► pp. 1 ff. 
Moratto, Riccardo & Zhimiao Yang
2024. Probing the cognitive load of consecutive interpreters. Translation and Interpreting Studies 19:2 ► pp. 234 ff.
Pöchhacker, Franz
2024. Conference Interpreting. In Reference Module in Social Sciences,
Su, Yueyue
2024. Book review: Claire Y. Shih and Caiwen Wang (Eds.), Translation and Interpreting as Social Interaction: Affect, Behavior and Cognition. Interpreting and Society 4:2 ► pp. 224 ff.
Cheung, Andrew K. F.
2022. Remote Simultaneous Interpreting from Home or Hub: Accuracy of Numbers from English into Mandarin Chinese. In Translation and Interpreting in the Age of COVID-19 [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 9], ► pp. 113 ff.
Iturriaga, Cristián & Alys Young
2021. Deaf Students’ Translanguaging Practices in a Further Education College: Situating the Semiotic Repertoire in Social Interactions. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 27:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
Wang, Weiwei
2021. Introducing China’s Standards of English Language Ability (CSE)—Interpreting Competence Scales. In Testing and Assessment of Interpreting [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 15 ff.
de Boe, Esther
2020. Chapter 3. Remote interpreting in dialogic settings. In Linking up with Video [Benjamins Translation Library, 149], ► pp. 77 ff.
Gil-Bardají, Anna
2020. Ethics, accuracy, and interpreting in social settings. Translation and Interpreting Studies 15:1 ► pp. 132 ff.
Wang, Weiwei, Yi Xu, Binhua Wang & Lei Mu
2020. Developing Interpreting Competence Scales in China. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Yang, Shanshan, Defeng Li & Victoria Lai Cheng Lei
2020. The impact of source text presence on simultaneous interpreting performance in fast speeches. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 66:4-5 ► pp. 588 ff.
Zhou, Jiayuan & Yuqi Sun
2020. Omissão na interpretação consecutiva de português para chinês por aprendentes chineses. Letras de Hoje 55:3 ► pp. e37614 ff.
Bone, Tracey A.
2019. Deaf Mental Health: Enhancing Linguistically and Culturally Appropriate Clinical Practice. In Culture, Diversity and Mental Health - Enhancing Clinical Practice [Advances in Mental Health and Addiction, ], ► pp. 61 ff.
Granhagen Jungner, Johanna, Elisabet Tiselius, Klas Blomgren, Kim Lützén & Pernilla Pergert
2019. The interpreter’s voice: Carrying the bilingual conversation in interpreter-mediated consultations in pediatric oncology care. Patient Education and Counseling 102:4 ► pp. 656 ff.
Rosendo, Lucía Ruiz & María Cecilia Galván
2019. Coping with speed. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 65:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Arumí Ribas, Marta
2018. La interpretación dialógica como práctica estratégica. Análisis de la toma de decisiones de cinco intérpretes en los Servicios Públicos. Meta 63:1 ► pp. 118 ff.
Marks, Annie
Petitta, Giulia, Mark Halley & Brenda Nicodemus
Russo, Mariachiara
2018. Speaking Patterns and Gender in the European Parliament Interpreting Corpus: A Quantitative Study as a Premise for Qualitative Investigations. In Making Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 115 ff.
Wu, Yinyin & Posen Liao
2018. Re-conceptualising interpreting strategies for teaching interpretation into a B language. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12:2 ► pp. 188 ff.
Xu, Ran
2018. Corpus-based terminological preparation for simultaneous interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 20:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Downie, Jonathan
2017. Finding and critiquing the invisible interpreter – a response to Uldis Ozolins. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 19:2 ► pp. 260 ff.
Downie, Jonathan
2023. A comparative interpreting studies view of interpreting in religious contexts. Translation and Interpreting Studies 18:3 ► pp. 448 ff.
Han, Chao & Sijia Chen
2016. Strategy use in English-to-Chinese simultaneous interpreting. FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 14:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Janzen, Terry
2016. Review of Roy & Napier (2015): The sign language interpreting studies reader. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 18:2 ► pp. 294 ff.
Vargas-Urpi, Mireia
2016. Problems and strategies in public service interpreting as perceived by a sample of Chinese-Catalan/Spanish interpreters. Perspectives 24:4 ► pp. 666 ff.
Wang, Jihong
2016. The relationship between working memory capacity and simultaneous interpreting performance. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Barghout, Alma, Lucía Ruiz Rosendo & Mónica Varela García
2015. The influence of speed on omissions in simultaneous interpretation. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 61:3 ► pp. 305 ff.
Yan, Jackie Xiu, Jun Pan, Hui Wu & Ying Wang
2013. Mapping interpreting studies: The state of the field based on a database of nine major translation and interpreting journals (2000–2010). Perspectives 21:3 ► pp. 446 ff.
Warnicke, Camilla & Charlotta Plejert
2012. Turn-organisation in mediated phone interaction using Video Relay Service (VRS). Journal of Pragmatics 44:10 ► pp. 1313 ff.
Zimányi, Krisztina
2010. On the Situational and Cultural Significance of Narratives in Mental Health Interpreting. FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 8:1 ► pp. 237 ff.
Hsieh, Elaine
2008. “I am not a robot!” Interpreters' Views of Their Roles in Health Care Settings. Qualitative Health Research 18:10 ► pp. 1367 ff.
Kellett Bidoli, Cynthia Jane
2007. Review of Roy (2005): Advances in teaching sign language interpreters. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 9:1 ► pp. 130 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.