Doctor–patient consultations in dyadic and triadic exchanges

Carmen Valero-Garcés | University of Alcalá

This article presents the results of a study on doctor–patient interaction in dyadic and triadic exchanges. The analysis is based on transcripts of recordings done at healthcare centres in northern Madrid, Spain, and Minneapolis, USA. The methodological approach is that of institutional discourse analysis as developed by Drew and Heritage (Drew & Heritage 1992; Heritage 1995, 1997; Drew & Sorjonen 1997). Three different types of doctor–patient interaction are examined: (1) doctor/foreign-language patient; (2) doctor/ foreign-language patient/ad hoc interpreter; (3) doctor/ foreign-language patient/trained interpreter. Topics such as the assignment of participant roles, changes in the general structure, turn-taking, and asymmetrical relationships will be explored. The study is mainly descriptive and qualitative, but also includes some comparative quantitative analyses.

Keywords: triadic exchanges, ad hoc interpreter, public service interpreting, doctor–patient consultation, institutional discourse analysis, dyadic exchanges

Published online: 09 November 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.7.2.04val

Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

No author info given

2019. In Conversation-analytic transcription of Arabic-German talk-in-interaction [Working Papers in Corpus Linguistics and Digital Technologies: Analyses and Methodology, 2],

Bridges, Susan, Paul Drew, Olga Zayts, Colman McGrath, Cynthia K.Y. Yiu, H.M. Wong & T.K.F. Au

2015. Interpreter-mediated dentistry. Social Science & Medicine 132 ► pp. 197 ff.

Disney, Stephen J.

2020. Figurative Language in Describing Pain and Lifestyle Impact. English Studies 101:8 ► pp. 1009 ff.

Hardt, Eric, Elizabeth A. Jacobs & Alice Chen

2006. Letter to the editor regarding aranguri et al.. Journal of General Internal Medicine 21:12 ► pp. 1357 ff.

Leins, Drew A., Laura A. Zimmerman & Emily N. Polander

2017. Observers’ Real-Time Sensitivity to Deception in Naturalistic Interviews. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 32:4 ► pp. 319 ff.

Martínez-Gómez, Aída

2015. Bibliometrics as a tool to map uncharted territory: A study on non-professional interpreting. Perspectives 23:2 ► pp. 205 ff.

Paananen, Jenny & Ali Reza Majlesi

2018. Patient-centered interaction in interpreted primary care consultations. Journal of Pragmatics 138 ► pp. 98 ff.

Pines, Rachyl L., Liz Jones & Nicola Sheeran

2020. Using Family Members as Medical Interpreters: An Explanation of Healthcare Practitioners’ Normative Practices in Pediatric and Neonatal Departments in Australia. Health Communication 35:7 ► pp. 902 ff.

Rosenberg, E., C. Richard, M.-T. Lussier & T. Shuldiner

2011. The content of talk about health conditions and medications during appointments involving interpreters. Family Practice 28:3 ► pp. 317 ff.

Rosenberg, Ellen, Yvan Leanza & Robbyn Seller

2007. Doctor–patient communication in primary care with an interpreter: Physician perceptions of professional and family interpreters. Patient Education and Counseling 67:3 ► pp. 286 ff.

Vickers, Caroline H., Ryan Goble & Sharon K. Deckert

2015. Third party interaction in the medical context: Code-switching and control. Journal of Pragmatics 84 ► pp. 154 ff.

Wadensjö, Cecilia

2015. In Handbook of Pragmatics,

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.