Review published in:
Interpreting
Vol. 8:1 (2006) ► pp. 105–112
Book review

Sandra Beatriz Hale. The discourse of court interpreting. Discourse practices of the law, the witness and the interpreter
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2004. 265 pp. ISBN 90-272-1658-4(Eur.) [Benjamins Translation Library, 52].

Reviewed by
Published online: 08 June 2006
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.8.1.09mor
References
Berk-Seligson, S.
(1990) The bilingual courtroom. Court interpreters in the judicial process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) The impact of court interpreting on the coerciveness of leading questions. Forensic Linguistics 6 (1), 30–56.Google Scholar
Conley, J. M., O’Barr, W. M. & Lind, E. A.
(1978) The power of language: Presentational style in the courtroom. Duke Law Journal, March, 1375–1399.Google Scholar
Conley, J. & O’Barr, W.
(1998) Just words: Law, language, and power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eades, D.
(2001) Discourse analysis and the law. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of sociolinguistics. Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier, 231–233.Google Scholar
Hale, S. & Luzardo, C.
(1997) What am I expected to do? The interpreter’s ethical dilemma. A study of Arabic, Spanish and Vietnamese speakers’ perceptions and expectations of interpreters. Antipodean. The Australian Translation Journal 11 (October), 10–16.Google Scholar
Laster, K. & Taylor, V.
(1994) Interpreters and the legal system. Leichhardt: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
Mason, I.
(1999) Introduction. The Translator, Special Issue on Dialogue Interpreting 5(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
Morris, R.
(1999) The gum syndrome: Predicaments in court interpreting. Forensic Linguistics 6 (1), 6–29.Google Scholar
O’Barr, W.
(1982) Linguistic evidence. Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rigney, A.
(1999) Questioning in interpreted testimony. Forensic Linguistics 6 (1), 83–108.Google Scholar