While there is extensive research on the language of twitter, our knowledge of the pragmatics of particular twitter genres (and sub-genres) is still piecemeal. At the same time, in the past decades, political discourse analysis has widened our understanding of how language can be used instrumentally to alter or manipulate public interaction, meanings and opinions. However, it has seldom examined the evaluative load of political communication in much detail. To this end, the paper, on the one hand, serves to illuminate the pragmatics of political tweets as a twitter genre. On the other hand, the study brings to the fore the strategic use of negative evaluations in political online campaigning and discusses its potential (and actual) socio-political ramifications. The quantitative and qualitative analysis of negative evaluations largely draws on Martin and White’s Appraisal framework (2005) and is based on a compatible study by Cabrejas-Peñuelas and Díez-Prados (2014). I track down, classify and categorize the negative evaluations of a subset of twitter posts by Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in a self-compiled corpus of 1965 tweets, with a view to evaluation types, their relative frequencies and dispersion across the corpus, as well as objects and targets of evaluation. The quantitative analysis is then completed by a qualitative examination of the objects and targets of evaluation in both twitter profiles as well as a closer look at the recurrent language used to evaluate the political “other”. The results show that Trump makes more flexible (and strategic) use of negative evaluations (both in terms of types, frequency and distribution), while Clinton’s negative evaluations are less frequent, less diverse and, thus possibly, less convincing.
2012 “Doing leadership in political speech: semantic processes and pragmatic inferences.” Discourse & Society 23(2): 127–144.
1996Linguistic Criticism (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greenwood, Shannon, Andrew Perrin, and Maeve Duggan
2016 “Social media update 2016.” [URL] (last accessed 07/11/2017).
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Haarman, Louann, and Linda Lombardo
(eds.)2009Evaluation and Stance in War News: A Linguistic Analysis of American, British and Italian Television News Reporting of the 2003 Iraqi War. London: Continuum.
2010Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
1993 “Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing.” In Register Analysis, ed. by Mohsen Ghadessy, 57–73. London: Pinter.
2000 “Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoffrey Thompson, 176–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hunston, Susan, and Geoffrey Thompson
(eds.)2000Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press
1960 “Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2013 “ ‘Register idiosyncratic’ evaluative choice in Congressional debate: a corpus-assisted comparative study.” In Systematic-Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, ed. by Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett, and Gerard O’Grady, 432–453. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2012 “New media and political marketing in the United States: 2012 and beyond.” Journal of Political Marketing 11 (1–2): 95–119.
2014 “ ‘Usually not one to complain but …’: Constructing identities in user-generated online reviews.” In The Language of Social Media. Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 65–90. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Walker Rettberg, Jill
2008Blogging. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wiebe, Janyce, Theresa Wilson, and Claire Cardie
2005 “Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language.” Language Resources and Evaluation 39(2–3): 165–210.
2014 “Ambient affiliation in microblogging: Bonding around the Quotidian.” Media International Australia 1511: 97–103.
2015 “Searchable talk: the linguistic functions of hashtags.” Social Semiotics 25(3): 274–291.
2017 “Evaluation.” In The Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 435–459. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by 10 other publications
2019. Microblogging. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, ► pp. 1 ff.
2022. Engaging social media users with attitudinal messages during health crisis communication. Lingua 268 ► pp. 103199 ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Trump’s Novelty. In Trump and Us, ► pp. 167 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.