Article published In:
Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 1:1 (2018) ► pp.5587
References (48)
References
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Anna B., and Mercedes Díez-Prados. 2014. “Positive self-evaluation versus negative other-evaluation in the political genre of pre-election debates.” Discourse & Society 25(2): 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capp, Piotr, and Urszula Okulska (eds.). 2013. Analyzing Genres in Political Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chin, Delenn, Anna Zappone, and Jessica Zhao. 2015. “Analyzing Twitter sentiment of the 2016 presidential candidates.” [URL] (last accessed 07/11/2017).
Conway, Bethany A., Kate Kenski, and Di Wang. 2015. “The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda‐setting effects in the presidential primary.” Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication 20(4): 363–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drasovean, Anda, and Caroline Tagg. 2015. “Evaluative language and its solidarity-building role on TED.com: An appraisal and corpus analysis.” Language @ Internet 121. [URL] (accessed 07/03/2017)
Dunmire, Patricia L. 2012. “Political discourse analysis: Exploring the language of politics and the politics of languageLanguage and Linguistics Compass 6 (11): 735–751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne, and Diana Slade. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita (ed.). 2013. The Pragmatics of Political Discourse. Explorations across Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “I think, I mean and I believe in political discourse: Collocates, functions and distribution.” Functions of Language 21(1): 67–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Peter Bull. 2012. “Doing leadership in political speech: semantic processes and pragmatic inferences.” Discourse & Society 23(2): 127–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Roger. 1996. Linguistic Criticism (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Shannon, Andrew Perrin, and Maeve Duggan. 2016. “Social media update 2016.” [URL] (last accessed 07/11/2017).
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Haarman, Louann, and Linda Lombardo (eds.). 2009. Evaluation and Stance in War News: A Linguistic Analysis of American, British and Italian Television News Reporting of the 2003 Iraqi War. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hood, Susan. 2010. Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 1993. “Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing.” In Register Analysis, ed. by Mohsen Ghadessy, 57–73. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoffrey Thompson, 176–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan, and Geoffrey Thompson (eds.). 2000. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kreis, Ramona. 2017. “The ‘Tweet politics’ of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 607-618. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1997. “Some further steps in narrative analysis.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 71: 395–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lauerbach, Gerda. 2006. “Discourse representation in political interviews: The construction of identities and relations through voicing and ventriloquizing.” Journal of Pragmatics 38(2): 196–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Donna R. 2004. “‘Truth, justice and the American Way’: The appraisal system of judgement in the US House debate on the impeachment of the President, 1998’. In Cross-cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 271–300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Donna R., and Jane H. Johnson. 2013. “‘Register idiosyncratic’ evaluative choice in Congressional debate: a corpus-assisted comparative study.” In Systematic-Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, ed. by Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett, and Gerard O’Grady, 432–453. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Martin. 2017. “Post-truth politics? Authenticity, populism and the electoral discourses of Donald Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 619-639. DOI logo.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Mick. 2012. “Appraisal analysis and the computer.” Revista Canarias de Estudios Ingleses. 651: 115–30.Google Scholar
Ott, Brian L. 2017. “The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 34 (1): 59–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth. 2012. Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David D. 2008. “Political blogging and campaign 2008: A roundtable.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 13(2): 160–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puschmann, Cornelius. 2009. “Lies at Wal-Mart. Style and the subversion of genre in the Life at Wal-Mart blog.” In Genres in the Internet: Issues in the Theory of Genre, ed. by Janet Giltrow, and Dieter Stein, 49–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reber, Elisabeth. 2014. “Constructing evidence at Prime Minister’s Question Time: An analysis of the grammar, semantics and pragmatics of the verb ‘see’.” Intercultural Pragmatics 11(3): 357–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Antonio. 2011. “Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions.” Discourse & Society 22(6): 781–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Christoph. 2010. “Narrative sequences in political discourse: Forms and functions in speeches and hypertext frameworks.” In Narrative Revisited: Telling a Story in the Age of New Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, 143–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 1996. “Image-building through modality: The case of political interviews.” Discourse & Society 71: 389–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. “Modal (un)certainty in political discourse: A functional account.” Language Sciences 191: 341–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John M., and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoffrey, and Laura Alba-Juez (eds.). 2014. Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Towner, Terri, and David A. Dulio. 2012. “New media and political marketing in the United States: 2012 and beyond.” Journal of Political Marketing 11 (1–2): 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, Camilla. 2014. “‘Usually not one to complain but …’: Constructing identities in user-generated online reviews.” In The Language of Social Media. Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 65–90. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker Rettberg, Jill. 2008. Blogging. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Wiebe, Janyce, Theresa Wilson, and Claire Cardie. 2005. “Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language.” Language Resources and Evaluation 39(2–3): 165–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2014. “Ambient affiliation in microblogging: Bonding around the Quotidian.” Media International Australia 1511: 97–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Searchable talk: the linguistic functions of hashtags.” Social Semiotics 25(3): 274–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Evaluation.” In The Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 435–459. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Hansson, Sten & Ruth Page
2023. Legitimation in government social media communication: the case of the Brexit department. Critical Discourse Studies 20:4  pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Makki, Mohammad & Andrew S. Ross
2023. “We were cocked & loaded to retaliate”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mortazavi, Seyed Mohammadreza, Hamed Zandi & Mohammad Makki
2023. “A history lesson, perhaps, for my novice counterpart”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Sun, Jing & Zhenqian Liu
2023. Evaluation Mechanism of Political Discourse: A Holistic Approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:6  pp. 2143 ff. DOI logo
Makki, Mohammad & Michele Zappavigna
2022. Out-grouping and ambient affiliation in Donald Trump’s tweets about Iran. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:1  pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
O’Farrell, Kate
2022. “Completely incapable of logical thought”. Internet Pragmatics 5:2  pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Palomino-Manjón, Patricia
2022. Feminist activism on Twitter. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1  pp. 140 ff. DOI logo
Yao, Le & Cindy Sing Bik Ngai
2022. Engaging social media users with attitudinal messages during health crisis communication. Lingua 268  pp. 103199 ff. DOI logo
Gruber, Helmut
Kumar, Ritesh
2020. #shutdownjnu vs #standwithjnu. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Dayter, Daria
2019. Microblogging. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Trump’s Novelty. In Trump and Us,  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.