This paper overviews the phenomenon of the meta-conventionalisation of interpersonal practices in the context of computer-mediated
communication. The term ‘meta-conventionalisation’ refers to the coding of the conventional interpersonal practices of a
particular group, or various groups, in the form of entertainment as films and novels. The word ‘meta’ refers to the fact that
such pieces of artwork narrate a set of conventional practices from a quasi-observer point of view, without involving their
audience in these practices as language users – in this sense they are different from good practice guides (typically described as
‘netiquette, in the context of e-pragmatics), which assume that readers will internalise the practices they describe.
Meta-conventionalisation has been an understudied phenomenon, in spite of representing an important aspect of our daily lives. We
illustrate how this phenomenon operates by examining a Japanese case study: a popular novel which features the online interactions
of a group of otaku, that is, asocial young people who lock themselves up and interact in highly specific ways.
2005 “Otaku o meguru gensetsu no kousei: 1983nen-2005nen sabu karuchaa shi.” [Constituents of remarks on otaku: History of sub-culture 1983–2005]. Hiroshima Shudai Ronshu 461: 17–58.
Brooks, Max
2012World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War. London: Cuckworth Overlook.
Bucholtz, Mary
1999 “ ‘Why to be normal?’: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls.” Language in Society 28(2): 203–223.
Calhoun, Cheshire
2009 “What good is commitment?” Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy 119(4): 613–641.
Cook, Haruko
2008Socializing Identities through Speech Styles: Learners of Japanese as a Foreign Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2010 “Conventionalised impoliteness formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 3232–3245.
2007 “Introduction: Welcome to the multilingual Internet.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 3–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2010 “A genre approach to the study of im-politeness.” International Review of Pragmatics 2(1): 46–94.
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Graham, Sage Lambert
2008 “A manual for (im)politeness?: The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of practice.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 281–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hirai, Tomohisa
2007 “channeru no komyunikeeshon ni kansuru kousatsu: intaa netto to senron keisei ni kansuru giron e no
hihan.” [Communication in ‘2 Channel’: A critical approach to the internet and public opinion
arguments]. Media Communication 571: 163–174.
Holt, Richard
2004Dialogue on the Internet: Language, Civic Identity, and Computer-mediated Communication. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood.
Hung, David W. L., and Maich Nichani
2000 “Constructivism and e-learning: Balancing between the individual and social levels of cognition.” In New ‘Literacies’: Educational Response to a Knowledge-based Society: Proceedings of the ERA-AME-AMIC Joint Conference
2000, ed. by Jessie Ee, Berinderjeet Kaur, Ngan Hoe Lee, and Yeap Ban Har, 144–150. Singapore: Educational Research Association.
Inoue, Ippei
2006 “Netto shakai no wakamono kotoba.” [Youth language in network society]. Gengo [Language] 35(3): 60–67.
Jucker, Andreas H.
2008 “Historical pragmatics.” Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5): 894–906.
Jucker, Andreas H.
2014 “Courtesy and politeness in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: The Journal of Adam Mickiewicz University 49(3): 5–28.
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2013Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2017Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z.
forthcoming. The Language of Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Marcel Bax
2013 “In-group ritual and relational work.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 73–86.
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z., Michael Haugh, and Melody Wei-Lin Chang
2013 “Aggression and perceived national face threats in Mainland Chinese and Taiwanese discussion boards.” Multilingua 32(3): 343–372.
Katsuno, Hirofumi, and Christine Yano
2007 “Kaomoji and expressivity in a Japanese housewives’ chat room.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 278–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Locher, Miriam. A.
2010 “Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Politeness Research 61: 1–5.
Marsden, Liz, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2017 “The pragmatics of mimesis: A case study of intercultural email communication.” FLEKS: The Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice 4(1): 1–29.
McIntosh, Janet
2009 “Stance and distance: Social boundaries, self-lamination, and metalinguistic anxiety in white Kenyan narratives
about African occult.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 72–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, Laura
2004 “You are doing Burriko! Censoring/scrutinizing artificers of cute femininity in Japanese.” In Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People, ed. by Shigeko Okamoto, and Janet Shibamoto-Smith, 148–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2003a “Establishing a community of practice on the internet: Linguistic behavior in online Japanese
communication.” In Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society, ed. by Pawel M. Nowak, David Mortensen, and Corey Yoquelet, 337–348. Berkeley, CA: Berkley Linguistics Society.
Nishimura, Yukiko
2003b “Linguistic innovations and interactional features of casual online communication in Japanese.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9(1). [URL] (accessed 17 May 2017).
Nishimura, Yukiko
2007 “Linguistic innovations and interactional features in Japanese BBS communication.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 163–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nishimura, Yukiko
2008 “Japanese BBS websites as online communication: (Im)politeness perspectives.” Language @Internet 51. [URL] (accessed 3 March 2017).
Nishimura, Yukiko
2010a “Impoliteness in Japanese BBS interactions: Observations from message exchanges in two online
communities.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 33–55.
Nishimura, Yukiko
2010b “Linguistic and sociocultural studies of Japanese computer-mediated communication: A literature
review.” Toyogakuen University Kiyo 181: 329–345.
Ohta, Amy Synder
1999 “Interactional routines and the socialization of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 31(11): 1493–1512.
Okamoto, Shigeko
2016 “Variability and multiplicity in the meanings of stereotpyical gendered speech in Japanese.” East Asian Pragmatics 1(1): 5-37.
Okamoto, Takeshi
2014 “Otaku tourism and the anime pilgrimage in Japan.” Japan Forum 27(1): 12–36.
Paternoster, Annick
2015Cortesi e scortesi. Percorsi di pragmatica storica da Castiglione a Collodi. Rome: Carocci.
Pérez-Sabater, Carmen
2012 “The linguistics of social networking: A study of writing conventions of Facebook.” Linguistik Online 56(6). [URL].
Planchenault, Gaëlle
2010 “Virtual community and politeness: The use of female markers identity and solidarity in a
transvestites’ website.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 83–104.
Scheuermann, Larry, and Gary Taylor
1997 “Netiquette.” Internet Research 7(4): 269–273.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2016 “The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East-West debate.” East Asian Pragmatics 1(1): 73–106.
Terkourafi, Marina
2001 “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A frame-based approach.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.
Terkourafi, Marina, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2017 “Convention and ritual (im)politeness.” The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 171–195. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tobin, Joseph
1998 “An American otaku (or a boy’s virtual life on the net).” In Digital Diversions: Youth Culture in the Age of Multimedia, ed. by Julian Sefton-Green, 106–127. London: University College of London Press.
Wenger, Etienne
1998Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wuthnow, Robert
1989Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2006 “ ‘Densha otoko’ de yomi toku intaa netto komyunikeeshon.” [A sociological study of the Internet communication on Densha otoko]. Sugiyama Jogakuen University Kenkyu Ronshuu 371: 1–10.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Morality in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 385 ff.
Parvaresh, Vahid
2022. On the morality of taking offence. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 60 ff.
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.