Reply published In:
Internet PragmaticsVol. 2:1 (2019) ► pp.50–53
Author response
Internet pragmatics and the future
A reply to Fetzer, Jucker and Page
References (10)
Fetzer, Anita. 2019. “Some food for thought on the theory and practice of internet pragmatics .” Internet Pragmatics 2(1): 34–40. 
Jucker, Andreas H.. 2019. “Internet pragmatics and the fuzziness of analytical categories A response to Francisco Yus.” Internet Pragmatics 2(1): 41–46.
Page, Ruth. 2019. “The future of internet pragmatics: Challenges old and new.” Internet Pragmatics 2(1): 47–50.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yus, Francisco. 2005. “Attitudes and emotions through written text: The case of textual deformation in Internet chat rooms.” Pragmalingüística 131: 147–174.
. 2011. Cyberpragmatics. Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2014. “Not all emoticons are created equal.” Linguagem em (Dis)curso 14(3): 511–529.
. 2015. “The role of cognition and relevance in new digital narratives.” In Prospettive multilingue e interdisciplinari nel discorso specialistico, ed. by Elena Carpi, 81–107. Pisa: Pisa University Press.
. 2016. Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.