Article published in:
Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 2:1 (2019) ► pp. 5482
References

References

Bakhtin, Michail
1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Edited by Caryl Emerson, and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, John A.
2017 “Triangulating transmediality: A multimodal semiotic framework relating media, modes and genres.” Discourse, Context & Media 20: 160–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, John, Janina Wildfeuer, and Tuomo Hiippala
2017Multimodality, Foundations, Research and Analysis: A Problem-Oriented Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bawden, David, and Lyn Robinson
2000 “A distant mirror?; the Internet and the printing press.” Aslib Proceedings 52(2): 51–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
1988Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, Wisc.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
2004Worlds of Written Discourse. London: continuum.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
2009Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis: Auf der ethnologischen Grundlage der kabylischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
boyd, Dana, Scott Golder, and Gilad Lotan
2010 “Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the 43nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-43), 1–10. CD-ROM, IEEE Computer Society. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harre
1990 “Positioning: The discursive production of selves.” Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior 201(1): 43–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Draucker, Fawn, and Lauren Collister
2015 “Managing participation through modal affordances on Twitter.” Open Library of Humanities 1(1): 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dürscheid, Christa
2005 “Medien, Kommunikationsformen, kommunikative Gattungen.” Linguistik Online 22(1): 3–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2014 “On the part of ratified participants: Ratified listeners in multi-party interactions.” Brno Studies in English 40(1): 27–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad
1983 “Text und sprachliches Handeln.” In Schrift und Gedächtnis, ed. by Aleida Assmann, Jan Assmann, and Christof Hardmeier, 24–43. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad, and Jochen Rehbein
1986Muster und Institution. Untersuchungen zur schulischen Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Eisenlauer, Volker
2014 “Facebook as a third author – (Semi-)automated participation framework in Social Network Sites.” Journal of Pragmatics 72: 73–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, Elizabeth L.
2012The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Christian
2017Social Media: A Critical Introduction (2nd edn.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 80 ]
Gruber, Helmut
1998 “Computer-mediated communication and scholarly discourse: Forms of topic-initiation and thematic development.” Pragmatics 8: 21–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Specific genre features of new mass media.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 363–383. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2017 “Quoting and retweeting as communicative practices in computer mediated discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media 20: 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
to appear “Doing ordinariness on Twitter: An analysis of tweets of the 2016 Austrian presidential campaign candidates.” In Construction of Ordinariness across Media Genres, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Elda Weizman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne, and Hubert Knoblauch
1994 “ ‘Forms are the food of faith’: Gattungen als Muster kommunikativen Handelns.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie 4: 693–723.Google Scholar
1995 “Culturally patterned speaking practices – the analysis of communicative genres.” Pragmatics 5(1): 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
2006 “Interactional coherence in CMC.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4(4). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse.” Language at Internet 4, article 1. http://​www​.languageatinternet​.org​/articles​/2007​/761
2013 “Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent.” In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen, and Anna Marie Tester, 1–25. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Holly, Werner
1997 “Zur Rolle von Sprache in Medien: Semiotische und kommunikationsstrukturelle Grundlagen.” Muttersprache 107: 64–75.Google Scholar
2011 “Medien, Kommunikationsformen, Textsortenfamilien.” In Textsorten, Handlungsmuster, Oberflächen. Linguistische Typologien der Kommunikation, ed. by Stephan Habscheid, 144–164. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
2001 “Technologies, texts and affordances.” Sociology 35(2): 441–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1999 “Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge.” Applied Linguistics 20(3): 341–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobs, Eva-Maria
1999Textvernetzung in den Wissenschaften. Zitat und Verweis als Ergebnis rezeptiven, reproduktiven und produktiven Handelns. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
John, Nicholas A.
2013 “Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword.” New Media & Society 15(2): 167–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Khamis, Susie, Lawrence Ang, and Raymond Welling
2017 “Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of social media influencers.” Celebrity Studies 8(2): 191–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther
2010Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
[ p. 81 ]
Latour, Bruno
2005Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leeuwen, Theo van
2008Discourse and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Livnat, Zohar
2012Dialogue, Science and Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Yabing, Chloe Kliman-Silver, and Alan Mislove
2014 “The tweets they are A-changin’: Evolution of Twitter users and behaviour.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 305–314. Palo Alto: The AAAI Press. https://​www​.aaai​.org​/ocs​/index​.php​/ICWSM​/ICWSM14​/paper​/view​/8043Google Scholar
Martin, James R.
1992English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R., and David Rose
2008Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice, and dana boyd
2011 “To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 17(2): 139–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Carolyne R.
1994 “Genre as social action.” In Genre and the New Rhetoric, ed. by Aviva Freedman, and Peter Medway, 23–43. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth
2012 “The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags.” Discourse & Communication 6(2): 181–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi
2012 “Without you, I’m nothing: Performances of the self on Twitter.” International Journal of Communication 6: 1989–2006.Google Scholar
Schneider, Jan-Georg
2017 “Medien als Verfahren der Zeichenprozessierung: Grundsätzliche Überlegungen zum Medienbegriff und ihre Relevanz für die Gesprächsforschung.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 18: 34–55.Google Scholar
Severinson Eklundh, Kerstin
2010 “To quote or not to quote: Setting the context for computer-mediated dialogues.” Language at Internet 7, article 5. http://​www​.language​at​internet​.org​/articles​/2010​/2665
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spronck, Stef
2012 “Minds divided: Speaker attitudes in quotatives.” In Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, 71–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref
Squires, Helen
2015 “Twitter: Design, discourse and the implications of public text.” In Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulo, and Teresa Spiloti, 239–255. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suh, Bongwon, Lichan Hong, Peter Pirolli, and Ed H. Chi
2010 “Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network.” In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom 2010), 177–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite
2006 “Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 567–592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 82 ]
Vitak, Jessica
2012 “The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56(4): 451–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max
1988Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: UTB/Mohr.Google Scholar
Wieser, Matthias J.
2012Das Netzwerk von Bruno Latour: die Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie zwischen Science & Technology Studies und poststrukturalistischer Soziologie. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
2006 “Relevance theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Lawrence R. Horn, and Geoffrey Ward, 606–632. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1971Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele, and J. R. Martin
2018 “#Communing affiliation: Social tagging as a resource for aligning around values in social media.” Discourse, Context & Media, 22: 4–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Chang, Wei-Lin Melody, Michael Haugh & Hsi-Yao Su
2021. Taking it too far. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:3  pp. 382 ff. Crossref logo
Dynel, Marta
2020. Laughter through tears: Unprofessional review comments as humor on the ShitMyReviewersSay Twitter account. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:5  pp. 513 ff. Crossref logo
Haapanen, Lauri & Leo Leppänen
2020. Recycling a genre for news automation. AILA Review 33  pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo
Kirner-Ludwig, Monika
2020. Internet memes as multilayered re-contextualization vehicles in lay-political online discourse. Internet Pragmatics 3:2  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo
Sakai, Noboru
2019. How much reading between the lines is there in online game playing?. Internet Pragmatics 2:2  pp. 290 ff. Crossref logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Ying Tong & Francisco Yus
2020. Bonding across Chinese social media. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:3  pp. 431 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.