Cover not available
Article published In:
Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 2:1 (2019) ► pp.83–111

The pragmatic use of vocatives in private one-to-one digital communication

 | Birmingham City University
 | The Open University
This article examines a corpus of private text messages collected in Birmingham and surrounding towns in 2015. We look specifically at pragmatic roles played by the vocatives we find in the corpus. Since text messages are sent to targeted recipients, vocatives are structurally redundant, and we review literature concerning vocatives in spoken and written data to first see what categories others have proposed for these functions. We then challenge some of these categorisations, identifying a new category of ‘focuser’ which we argue is akin to a summons in spoken language. We also examine the pragmatic value of vocatives in performing identity work for both sender and receiver. We finish by looking at gendered performance of identity as a case study in our corpus of how text producers construct themselves and others.
Keywords: vocatives, pragmatic function, text messaging, gender, identity, categorisation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Vocatives and spoken discourse
  • 3.Vocatives and digital communication
  • 4.Affordances and constraints of digital communication and the mobile phone
  • 5.Context, data and methods
    • 5.1Description of context
    • 5.2Methods
    • 5.3Data and analysis
  • 6.Findings: First names and focusing
  • 7.Findings: Position analysis
  • 8.Findings: Vocatives as resources for identity positioning
    • 8.1Performing stylised gendered identity
    • 8.2Performing femaleness
  • 9.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00024.asp
References (58)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis, and Andreas Staehr. 2018. “Moving methods online: Researching digital language practices.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity, ed. by Angela Creese, and Adrian Blackledge, 118–132. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Astruc-Aguilera, Lluisa. 2005. “The form and function of extra-sentential elements.” Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 21: 1–25.Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi. 2008. Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1984. “Language style as audience design.” Language in Society 13(2): 145–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
boyd, danah. 2001. “Sexing the Internet: Reflections on the role of identification in online communities.” Paper presented at the conference ‘Sexualities, Medias, Technologies’, University of Surrey, 21-22 June 2001. [URL] (accessed 12 December 2018).
boyd, danah, and Alice E. Marwick. 2011. “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Church, Karen, and Rodrigo de Oliveira. 2013. “What’s up with WhatsApp?: Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI ’13), 352–361. New York: ACM Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Thomas B. Carlson. 1982. “Hearers and speech acts.” Language 58(2): 332–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creese, Angela, and Adrian Blackledge. 2010. “Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching?” The Modern Language Journal 941: 103–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2017. The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Darics, Erika. 2013. “Non-verbal signalling in digital discourse: the case of letter repetition.” Discourse, Context and Media 2(3): 141–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “The blurring boundaries between synchronicity and asynchronicity: New communicative situations in work-related instant messaging.” International Journal of Business Communication 51(4): 337–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harré. 1990. “Positioning: The discursive production of selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(1): 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penny. 1995. “Gender and sociolinguistic variation.” In Language and Gender: A Reader, ed. by Jennifer Coates, 64–77. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frobenius, Maximiliane. 2014. “Audience design in monologues: How vloggers involve their viewers.” Journal of Pragmatics 721: 59–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 1997. “Self-presentation and interactional alliances in e-mail discourse: the style and code-switches of Greek messages.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(2): 141–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillies, William. 1993. “Scottish Gaelic.” In The Celtic Languages, ed. by Martin Ball, 230–304. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1975. “Replies and responses.” Language in Society 51: 257–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunraj, Danielle N., April M. Drumm-Hewitt, Erica M. Dashow, Sri Siddhi N. Updadhyay, and Ceila M. Kin. 2016. “Texting insincerely: The role of the period in text messaging.” Computers in Human Behavior 55(B): 1067–1075. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Lila. 2005. Serbian: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom, and Luk Van Langenhove (eds.). 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan E. 2007. “A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse.” Language@Internet 41, article 1. [URL] (accessed 5 April 2017).
Hill, Jane. 1995. “Mock Spanish: A site for the indexical reproduction of racism in American English.” Language and Culture: Symposium 21. [URL] (accessed 5 April 2017).
. 1998. “Language, race, and white public space.” American Anthropologist 100(3): 680–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2008. Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity Through Workplace Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hultgren, Anna Kristina. 2017. “Vocatives as rationalized politeness: Theoretical insights from emerging norms in call centre service calls.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(1): 90–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, Mizuko, and Daisuke Okabe. 2005. “Technosocial situations: Emergent structurings of mobile email use.” In Personal, Portable, Intimate: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life, ed. by Mizuko Ito, Daisuke Okabe, and Misa Matsuda, 257–276. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Dariusz Galasiñski. 2000. “Vocative address forms and ideological legitimazation in political debates.” Discourse Studies 2(1): 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, James E., and Mark Aakhus. 2002. Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott. 2004. “Dude.” American Speech 79(3): 281–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laursen, Ditte. 2005. “Please reply! The replying norm in adolescent SMS communication.” In The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS, ed. by Richard Harper, Leysia Palen, and Alex Taylor, 53–73. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leppänen, Sirpa, Samu Kytölä, Henna Jousmäki, Saija Peuronen, and Elina Westinen. 2014. “Entextualisation and resemiotization as resources for identification in social media.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 112–138. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leppänen, Sirpa, Elina Westinen, and Samu Kytölä (eds.). 2017. Social Media Discourse, (Dis)identifications and Diversities. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1999. “The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation.” In Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, ed. by Hilde Hasselgård, and Signe Oksefjell, 107–120. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Littlemore, Jeannette, and Caroline Tagg. 2018. “Metonymy and text-messaging: A framework for understanding creative uses of metonymy.” Applied Linguistics 39(4): 481–507.Google Scholar
Lyons, Agnieszka. 2014. “Self-Presentation and self-positioning in text-messages: Embedded multimodality, deixis, and reference frame.” Unpublished PhD thesis, Queen Mary University of London.Google Scholar
Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller. 2012. Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
McAdam, Noel. 2014. “Gregory Campbell banned in absentia over ‘curry my yoghurt’ Irish language stunt.” Belfast Evening Telegraph, 5 November 2014. [URL] (accessed 5 April 2017).
Madsen, Lian Malai. 2013. “High and low in urban Danish speech styles.” Language in Society 42(2): 115–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd. 2014. “Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media.” New Media & Society 16(7): 1051–1067. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Michael, and Anne O’ Keeffe. 2003. “What’s in a Name? – Vocatives in casual conversations and radio phone-in calls.” In Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, ed. by Pepi Leistyna, and Charles Meyer, 153–185. Amsterdan: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Brona, and Fiona Farr. 2012. “‘I’m fine girl, and how are you?’: The use of vocatives in spoken Irish English.” In New Perspectives on Irish English, ed. by Bettina Migge, and Maíre Ní Chiosáin, 203–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Rahilly, Tomás. 1921. “The vocative in Modern Irish.” Ériu 91: 85–91.Google Scholar
Rainie, Lee, and Barry Wellman. 2012. Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rettie, Ruth. 2007. “Texters not talkers: Phone call aversion among mobile phone users.” PsychNology Journal 5(1): 33–57.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel Schegloff. 1973. “Opening up closings.” Semiotica 81: 289–327.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1993. “Telephone conversation.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by R. E. Asher, and J. M. Y. Simpson, 4547–4549. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Beginnings in the telephone.” In Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance ed. by James Katz, and Mark Aarhus, 284–300. Oxford: Pergamon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skovholt, Karianne. 2015. “Doing leadership in a virtual team: analysing addressing devices, requests, and emoticons in a leader’s e-mail messages.” In Digital Business Discourse ed. by Erika Darics, 101–121. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tagg, Caroline. 2012. The Discourse of Text Messaging. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tagg, Caroline, and Esther Asprey. 2017. “Messaging in the Midlands: Exploring digital literacy repertoires in a superdiverse region.” IRiS Working Paper Series 161. [URL] (accessed 8 September 2017).
Tagg, Caroline, and Philip Seargeant. 2014. “Audience design and language choice in the construction and maintenance of translocal communities on social network sites.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 161–185. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin, and Alex Brown. 2003. “Generation Txt? Exposing the sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging.” Discourse Analysis Online 1(1). [URL] (accessed 8 September 2017).
Wollaston, Sam. 2017. “How to send GIFs to your friends and groups on WhatsApp.” Wired 25 March 2017. [URL] (accessed 18 September 2017).
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ilbury, Christian
2024. HRT in DMC? the orthographic representation of high rising terminals in WhatsApp. Discourse, Context & Media 61 ► pp. 100819 ff. DOI logo
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M.
2023. A syntactic and pragmatic study of nominal vocatives in the Twitter exchanges of rappers’ fans. Journal of Pragmatics 207 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
ÖZER, Nuriye & Pınar İBE AKCAN
2022. A Pragmatic Function-Position Analysis of Address Terms: Tendencies in Turkish. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 8:2 ► pp. 456 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.