Article published in:
The Pragmatics of Internet Memes
Edited by Chaoqun Xie
[Internet Pragmatics 3:2] 2020
► pp. 223259
References
Aijmer, Karin
1996Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Arundale, Robert B.
2008 “Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction.” Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2): 229–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, Dale J. and Boaz Keysar
2007 “Making sense of how we make sense: The paradox of egocentrism in language use.” In Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences, ed. by Herbert L. Colston, and Albert N. Katz, 21–42. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, Ludwig von
1968General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Blackmore, Susan
1999The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cannizzarro, Sara
2016 “Internet memes as internet signs: A semiotic view of digital culture.” Sign Systems Studies 44(4): 562–586. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Catherine R. Marshall
1981 “Definite reference and mutual knowledge.” In Elements of Discourse Understanding, ed. by Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber, and Ivan A. Sag, 10–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert L.
2007 “Social and cultural influences on figurative and indirect language.” In Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influence, ed. by Herbert L. Colston, and Albert N. Katz, 99–130. New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2008 “A new look at common ground: memory, egocentrism, and joint meaning.” In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. by Istvan Kecskes, and Jacob Mey, 151–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Conte, Rosaria
2000 “Memes through (social) minds.” In Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, ed. by Robert Aunger, 83–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
1981Conversational Routine. Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard
1976The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diedrichsen, Elke
2013a “Constructions as memes – Interactional function as cultural convention beyond the words.” In Beyond Words, ed. by Frank Liedtke, and Cornelia Schulze, 283–305. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b “From idioms to sentence structures and beyond: The theoretical scope of the concept ‘Construction’.” In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics: The Role of Constructions in Grammars, ed. by Brian Nolan, and Elke Diedrichsen, 295–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “On the semiotic potential of Internet memes.” In Vision Fulfilled: The Victory of the Pictorial Turn, ed. by András Benedek, and Kristóf Nyíri, 201–213. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences and Budapest University of Technology and Economics.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2016 “ ‘I has seen image macros!’: Advice Animal memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication 101: 660–688.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
1976A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, Bruce
2002 “Three challenges for the survival of memetics.” Journal of Memetics 6(2). http://​cfpm​.org​/jom​-emit​/2002​/vol6​/edmonds​_b​_letter​.html (accessed 22 December 2017).
2005 “The revealed poverty of the gene-meme analogy – why memetics per se has failed to produce substantive results.” Journal of Memetics 9(1). http://​cfpm​.org​/jom​-emit​/2005​/vol9​/edmonds​_b​.html (accessed 12 January 2018).
Enfield, Nicholas J.
2008 “Common ground as a resource for social affiliation.” In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. by Istvan Kecskes, and Jacob Mey, 223–254. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Erlehmann, and Plomlompom
2013Internet-MEME: kurz & geek [Internet Memes: short & geeky]. Köln: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Flora
2017Meme: Die Kunst des Remix. Bildsprache politischer Netzkultur [Memes: The Art of Remix. Visual Language of Political Internet Culture]. Berlin: Amadeu Antonio Stiftung.Google Scholar
Katz, Albert N.
2007 “Discourse and sociocultural factors in understanding nonliteral language.” In Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences, ed. by Herbert L. Colston, and Albert N. Katz, 185–209. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Katz, Yuval, and Limor Shifman
2017 “Making sense? The structure and meanings of digital memetic nonsense.” Information Communication and Society 20(6): 825–842. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2003Situation-Bound Utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 401: 385–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2889–2897. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Sociopragmatics and cross-cultural and intercultural studies.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 599–616. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Intercultural Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang
2009 “Activating, seeking and creating common ground: A Socio-cognitive approach.” Pragmatics & Cognition 17(2): 331–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knobel, Michele, and Colin Lankshear
2007 “Online memes, affinities, and cultural production.” In A New Literacies Sampler, ed. by Michele Knobel, and Colin Lankshear, 199–227. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lefler, Jordan
2011 “I can has thesis? A linguistic analysis of lolspeak.” LSU MA Thesis. https://​digitalcommons​.lsu​.edu​/gradschool​_theses​/1271
Levinson, Stephen C.
2006 “On the human ‘interaction engine’.” In Roots of Human Sociality, ed. by Nicholas J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson, 39–69. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Milner, Ryan M.
2012 “The world made meme: Discourse and identity in participatory media.” PhD dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
2013 “Hacking the social: Internet memes, identity antagonism, and the logic of lulz.” The Fibreculture Journal 221: 61–92.Google Scholar
2016The World Made Meme: Discourse and Identity in Participatory Media. Cambridge: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miltner, Kate M.
2014 “ ‘There’s no place for lulz on Lolcats’: The role of genre, gender and group identity in the interpretation and enjoyment of an Internet meme.” First Monday 19(8). https://​firstmonday​.org​/ojs​/index​.php​/fm​/article​/view​/5391​/4103 (accessed 25 December 2017). Crossref
Nissenbaum, Asaf, and Limor Shifman
2017 “Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s \b\ board.” New Media & Society 19(4): 483–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panzarasa, Pietro, and Nicholas R. Jennings
2006 “Collective cognition and emergence in multi-agent systems.” In Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction, ed. by Ron Sun, 401–408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Nick
1998 “Controversies in meme theory.” Journal of Memetics 2(1): 66–76.Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad
2011Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shifman, Limor
2014Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan
1994 “The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations.” In Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, ed. by Lawrence A. Hirschfeld, and Susan A. Gelman, 39–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
2000 “An objection to the memetic approach to culture.” In Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, ed. by Robert Aunger, 163–173. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2008Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varis, Piia, and Jan Blommaert
2015 “Conviviality and collectives on social media: Virality, memes, and new social structures.” Multilingual Margins 2(1): 31–45.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2018 “Identity-related issues in meme communication.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 113–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Diedrichsen, Elke
2020. Linguistic expressions as cultural units. International Journal of Language and Culture 7:1  pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.