Self-denigration and the mixed messages of ‘ugly’ selfies in Instagram
This paper sets out a new, multimodal account (both visual and verbal analysis) of how self-denigration is conveyed through ‘ugly selfies’ as posted to the photo-sharing site Instagram. Drawing on 226 Instagram posts categorised by the poster themselves with the hashtag #uglyselfie, the visual analysis compared the persons and setting in the selfie, the person’s facial expression (eye brow position, mouth expression), eye gaze and camera angle. The verbal analysis included the self-denigration found in the image caption and the rapport enhancing or threatening responses found in the comments to the image posted by others. Ugly selfies are found to convey various types of self-denigration, including self-deprecation and self-mockery. The difference between self-deprecation and self-mockery are explained by the types of ‘mixed messages’ generated by the images. In self-deprecation, the mixed messages arise from a contrast between the visual image and the verbal caption. In self-mockery, the mixed messages arise from contrasts within the image itself, where visual exaggeration and incongruity lead to a jocular interpretation of the ugly selfie. Although the focus in this paper is on self-denigration and selfie-taking, the analysis of mixed messages can be used to analyse many different forms of politeness strategies and many kinds of images shared with increasing frequency and importance on social media sites.
Keywords: self-denigration, self-deprecation, self-mockery, selfies, humour, Instagram, ugly selfies
Published online: 20 September 2019
Adami, Elisabetta, and Carey Jewitt
Anderson, Monica, and Jingjing Jiang
2018 “Teens’ social media habits and experiences.” Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/11/28/teens-and-their-experiences-on-social-media/ (accessed 10 January 2019).
Attardo, Salvatore, Jodi Eisterhold, Jennifer Hay, and Isabella Poggi
Balakrishnan, Janarthanan, and Mark D. Griffiths
2014 “With some selfies, the uglier the better.” New York Times, 21 February 2014. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/fashion/selfies-the-uglier-the-better-technology.html (accessed 26 November 2018).
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
Bolander, Brook, and Miriam Locher
Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Valeria Sinkeviciute
Hu, Yuheng, Lydia Makikonda, and Subbarao Kambhampati
Kim, Mary Shin
Kofoed, Jette, and Malene Charlotte Larsen
2016 “A snap of intimacy: Photo-sharing practices among young people on social media.” First Monday 21(11). Available at: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/6905/5648 (accessed 20 April 2018).
Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch
Machin, David, Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Tommaso Milani
Placencia, María Elena, Amanda Lower, and Hebe Powell
Schnurr, Stephanie, and Angela Chan
Tabacaru, Sabina, and Maarten Lemmens
Tiggeman, Marika, and Mia Zaccardo
Veum, Aslaug, and Linda Victoria Moland Undrum
Walkinshaw, Ian, Nathaniel Mitchell, and Sophiaan Subhan
Wang, Ruoxu, Fan Yang, and Michel M. Haigh
Cited by 2 other publications
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.