Article published in:
Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 2:2 (2019) ► pp. 233–259

Agency and impoliteness in Korean online interactions

| McMaster University
| Monash University
(Im)politeness research has often focused either on the importance of social norms or on the intentions of the speaker, with the active role of the listener in assigning social meanings overlooked. This limitation particularly applies to so-called “discernment languages” such as Korean and Japanese. The current paper addresses this gap by offering a small-scale qualitative study of recipient agency in Korean naturally occurring computer-mediated communication (CMC). The data analyzed includes 14 text messages between the recipient (the proprietor of an online food business) and his customer, which were posted on a blog that he owned and operated. We focus on how the recipient agentively evaluates the language usage of the customer, including inconsistent evaluations of her use of non-honorific language, or panmal. The results suggest that the instability of (im)politeness interpretations cannot be explained solely by social norms or intentions but should also include the socially-mediated agency of the recipient.
Keywords: agency, (im)politeness, integrative pragmatics, CMC, Korean
Published online: 21 October 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00036.kim
References

References

Ahearn, Laura M.
2001 “Language and agency.” Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 109–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology (2nd. edn.). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis K.
2000 “Non-standard spellings in media texts: The case of German fanzines.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(4): 514–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Angouri, Jo, and Theodora Tseliga
2010 “ ‘you HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!’: From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 57–82.Google Scholar
Brown, Lucien
2011 Korean Honorifics and Politeness in Second Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a “ ‘Mind your own esteemed business’: Sarcastic honorifics use and impoliteness in Korean TV dramas.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(2): 159–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b “Teaching ‘casual’ and/or ‘impolite’ language through multimedia: the case of non-honorific panmal speech styles in Korea.” Culture and Curriculum 26(1): 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013c “ ‘Oppa, hold my purse’: A sociocultural study of identity and indexicality in the perception and use of Oppa ‘Older Brother’ by second language learners.” Korean Language in America 18: 1–22.Google Scholar
2015 “Revisiting ‘polite’ -yo and ‘deferential’ -supnita speech style shifting in Korean from the view point of indexicality.” Journal of Pragmatics 79: 43–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “An activity-theoretic study of agency and identity in the study abroad experiences of a lesbian nontraditional learner of Korea.” Applied Linguistics 37(6): 807–828.Google Scholar
Brown, Lucien, and Bodo Winter
2019 “Multimodal indexicality in Korean: Doing deference and performing intimacy through nonverbal behavior.” Journal of Politeness Research 15(1): 25–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lucien, Bodo Winter, Kaori Idemaru, and Sven Grawunder
2014 “Phonetics and politeness: Perceiving Korean honorific and non-honorific speech through phonetic cues.” Journal of Pragmatics 66: 45–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1978 “Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness, ed. by Esther N. Goody, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byon, Andrew S.
2006 “The role of linguistic indirectness and honorifics in achieving linguistic politeness in Korean requests.” Journal of Politeness Research 2(2): 247–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choo, Miho
2006 “The structure and use of Korean honorifics.” In Korean Language in Culture and Society, ed. by Ho-min Sohn, 132–154. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Pres.Google Scholar
Chun, Sun Young
2014 “Features and strategies of Korean EFL elementary school children’s email discourse.” STEM Journal 15(1): 197–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Haruko M.
2011 “Are honorifics polite? Uses of referent honorifics in a Japanese committee meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(15): 3655–3672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “A scientist or salesman? Identity construction through referent honorifics on a Japanese shopping channel program.” Multilingua 32(2): 177–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh
2014 Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Cynthia
2005 “Pragmatic functions of humble forms in Japanese ceremonial discourse.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(2): 218–238.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
2004 “Agency in language.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 451–473. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2012 “Swearing methodologically: the (im)politeness of expletives in anonymous commentaries on Youtube.” Journal of English Studies 10: 25–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino
2001 A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Graham, Sage
2007 “Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 742–759. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Impoliteness and the moral order in online gaming.” Internet Pragmatics 1(2): 303–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2007 “The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative.” Journal of Politeness Research 3(3): 295–317.Google Scholar
2010 “When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 7–3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Wei-Lin M. Chang
2019 “ ‘The apology seemed (in)sincere’: Variability in perceptions of (im)politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 142: 207–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Sandra
2006 “Transgressions, miscommunication and flames: Problematic incidents in email discussion.” In Internet Research Annual, ed. by Mia Consalvo, and Caroline Haythornthwaite, 105–117. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
2007 “A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse.” Language at Internet 4(1). https://​www​.languageatinternet​.org​/articles​/2007​/761 (accessed 8 March 2016).Google Scholar
Hwang, Juck-ryoon
1990 “ ‘Deference’ versus ‘politeness’ in Korean speech.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 82: 41–55.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
1989 “Formal forms and discernment.” Multilingua 8(2): 223–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Sara Mills
2011 “Introduction.” In Politeness in East Asia, ed. by Dániel Z. Kádár, and Sara Mills, 1–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Eun Young A., and Lucien Brown
2014 “Negotiating pragmatic competence in computer-mediated communication: The case of Korean address terms.” CALICO Journal 3(3): 264–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hyun-Oak A.
2011 “Politeness in Korea.” In Politeness in East Asia, eds. by Dániel Z. Kádár, and Sara Mills, 176–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key
1990 “On Panmal in Korean.” In ICKL 7: Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Korean Linguistics, 232–255. Osaka: ICKL and Osaka University of Economics and Law.Google Scholar
Lantolf, James, and Aneta Pavlenko
2001 “ ‘(S)econd (l)anguage (a)ctivity theory: understanding second language learners as people.” In Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in Research, ed. by Michael Breen, 141–158. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lantolf, James, and Steven Thorne
2006 Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Iksop, and Robert Ramsey
2000 The Korean Language. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung-bok
2001 Kweke kyengepep sayong-uy cenlyakcek thukseng [The Characteristics of Korean Honorific Strategic Use]. Seoul: Thaehaksa.Google Scholar
2009 Intheneys thongsin ene-uy hwaksan-kwa hankwuke yenkwu-uy hwaktay [The Spread of Internet Communication and the Expansion of Korean Language Research]. Seoul: Sotong.Google Scholar
Lo, Adrienne
2009 “Lessons about respect and affect in a Korean heritage language school.” Linguistics and Education 20(3): 217–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara
2003 Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Nathaniel, and Michael Haugh
2015 “Agency, accountability and evaluations of impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 11(2): 207–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oh, Sun-Young
2007 “The interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Korean conversation.” In Person Reference in Interaction, ed. by Nick J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 203–225. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2010 “Invoking categories through co-present person reference: The case of Korean conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(5): 1219–1242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, Chongwon
2010 “(Inter) subjectification and Korean honorifics.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 11(1): 122–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pasfield-Neofitou, Sarah
2007 “Textual features of intercultural Internet chat between learners of Japanese and English.” CALL-EJ Online 9(1). http://​callej​.org​/journal​/9​-1​/pasfield​-neofitou​.html (accessed 2 Mey 2018).Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
2012 “Do participants’ reports enhance conversation analytic claims? Explanations of one sort or another.” Discourse Studies 14(4): 499–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, Rosina M., and Sara Orthaber
2018 “Exploring the moral compass: Denunciations in a Facebook carpool group.” Internet Pragmatics 1(2): 242–271.Google Scholar
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2018 ““Ya bloody drango!!!”: Impoliteness as situated moral judgement on Facebook.” Internet Pragmatics 1(2): 272–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Susan, and Jong Oh Eun
2005 “Indexicality and honorific speech level choice in Korean.” Linguistics 43(3): 611–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2005 “Beyond the micro-level in politeness research.” Journal of Politeness Research 1(2): 237–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyay, Shiv
2010 “Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 105–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
1989 “Relevance and relational work: linguistic politeness as politic behavior.” Multilingua 8(2):131–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yeon, Jaehoon, and Lucien Brown
2011 Korean: A Comprehensive Grammar. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yoon, Kyung-Joo
2004 “Not just words: Korean social models and the use of honorifics.” Intercultural Pragmatics 1(2): 189–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Sang-Seok
2015 “Korean honorifics beyond politeness markers: Change of footing through shifting of speech style.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness, ed. by Marina Terkourafi, 97–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar