Cover not available
Article published In:
Understanding Chinese Social Media
Edited by Sumin Zhao and Chaoqun Xie
[Internet Pragmatics 4:2] 2021
► pp. 295–322

How and why people are impolite in danmu?

| University of Central Lancashire

This study explores how and why people are impolite in danmu. Danmu refers to anonymous comments overlaid on videos uploaded to video-sharing sites. Although there is wide recognition that impoliteness prevails in danmu, the questions of how and why people are impolite in this context have rarely been investigated. This study addresses this lacuna of research. Using both an analysis of comments identified as impolite by participants and an analysis of focus group interview data, this research identified seven impoliteness strategies, covering both conventionalised formulae and implicational impoliteness. By applying uses and gratifications theory, this study identified five uses and gratifications for performing impoliteness in danmu: social interaction, entertainment, relaxation, expression of (usually differing) opinions and finding connections. The dialectic of resonance and opposition that emerged from the data helped explain why impolite comments tended not to be perceived as inappropriate in danmu. Thus, this study contributes to the emerging research on impoliteness in social media.

Keywords: danmu , impoliteness, uses and gratifications theory, implicational impoliteness, conventionalised formulae, dialectic of resonance and opposition, video sharing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Impoliteness and danmu
  • 3.Uses and gratifications theory and danmu
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.How do people express impoliteness in danmu?
    • 5.1Conventionalised impoliteness formulae
      • Insults
      • Negative expressives
      • Threats
      • Challenges
      • Pointed criticisms
    • 5.2Implicational impoliteness
      • 5.2.1Convention-driven impoliteness strategies
        • Internal mismatches
        • External mismatches
      • 5.2.2Form-driven impoliteness strategies
  • 6.Why are people impolite in danmu?
    • Social interaction
    • Entertainment
    • Relaxation
    • Expression of (usually differing) opinions
    • Finding connection
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00057.wan
References
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2014 “Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2008 Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Gina Masullo
2011 “Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others.” Computers in Human Behavior 27(2): 755–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Yue, Qin Gao, and Pei-Luen Patrick Rau
2015 “Understanding gratifications of watching Danmaku videos – Videos with overlaid comments.” In Cross-Cultural Design Methods, Practice and Impact, ed. by Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, 153–163. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.” Journal of pragmatics 25(3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Impoliteness strategies.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone, and Jacob L. Mey, 421–445. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feng, Shaodan
2018 “弹幕视频语言的四大特征 [Four main features of danmu video language].” 传媒 [ Media ] 6(1): 47–48.Google Scholar
Gan, Chunmei, and Weijun Wang
2015 “Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of microblog and WeChat.” Journal of Systems and Information Technology 17(4): 351–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, Claire
2013 “ ‘Uh.… not to be nitpicky, but… the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug.’: An overview of trolling strategies.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1): 58–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Flaming and trolling.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 493–522. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Christian R.
2017 “Log in: Introducing the pragmatics of social media.” Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Marjut
2017 “Youtube.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 173–200. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., Michael Haugh, and Wei-Lin Melody Chang
2013 “Aggression and perceived national face threats in Mainland Chinese and Taiwanese CMC discussion boards.” Multilingua 32(3): 343–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khan, M. Laeeq
2017 “Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube?” Computers in Human Behavior 661: 236–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred
2018 “Impoliteness online: Hate speech in online interactions.” Internet Pragmatics 1(2): 329–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lange, Patricia G.
2014 “Commenting on YouTube rants: Perceptions of inappropriateness or civic engagement?” Journal of pragmatics 731: 53–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Bingyun
2018a “弹幕言语不礼貌研究 [Verbal impoliteness in Danmaku].” 外国语言文学 [ [ Foreign Language and Literature Studies ] 35(2): 145–161.Google Scholar
2018b “弹幕言语不礼貌的情感表达功能 [Emotional expression functions of linguistic impoliteness in danmu ].” 天津外国语大学学报 [ Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University ] 25(4): 82–94.Google Scholar
Liu, Lili, Ayoung Suh, and Christian Wagner
2016 “Watching online videos interactively: the impact of media capabilities in Chinese Danmaku video sites.” Chinese Journal of Communication 9(3): 283–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luo, Ying
2016 “ ‘使用与满足’ 理论在弹幕视频中的体现——以 bilibili 网为例 [The reflection of ‘Uses and gratifications’ theory in danmu videos: The example of bilibili.com].” 大众文艺 [ Popular Literature and Art ] (15): 170–171.Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd
2011 “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Yuling
2000 Politeness in Chinese Face-to-Face Interaction. Stamford: Ablex.Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2011 Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Qi, Xiaoxing, and Lijuan Hu
2017 “使用与满足理论视角下的弹幕流行现象分析 [An analysis of the popularization of barrage from the perspective of use and satisfaction theory].” 采写编 [ Journalism & Media Studies ] (2): 137–138.Google Scholar
Quan-Haase, Anabel, and Alyson L. Young
2010 “Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30(5): 350–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruggiero, Thomas E.
2000 “Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century.” Mass Communication & Society 3(1): 3–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg
(eds.) 2014 The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagg, Caroline, Philip Seargent, and Amy Aisha Brown
2017 Taking Offence on Social Media: Conviviality and Communication on Facebook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2015 “Conventionalization: A new agenda for im/politeness research.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 11–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Jiayi
2019 “Chinese business communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis, ed. by Chris Shei, 325–338. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Jiayi, and Charlotte Taylor
2019 “The conventionalisation of mock politeness in Chinese and British online forums.” Journal of Pragmatics 1421: 270–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whiting, Anita, and David Williams
2013 “Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 16(4): 362–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun, et al.
2015 网络交际中不礼貌话语的建构模式及其语用机制 [ Impoliteness in Computer-mediated Discourse: Construction Models and Pragmatic Mechanisms ]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun, and Francisco Yus
2018 “Introducing internet pragmatics.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xie, Mei, Ju He, and Yule Feng
2014 “大众传播游戏理论视角下的弹幕视频研究 [A study of danmu videos from the perspective of the play theory of mass communication].” 新闻界 [ Journalism and Mass Communication Monthly ] (2): 37–40.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2017 “Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in WhatsApp communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 1141: 66–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Leticia Tian, and Daniel Cassany
2019 “The ‘danmu’ phenomenon and media participation: Intercultural understanding and language learning through ‘The Ministry of Time’.” Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal 27(58): 19–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 “ ‘The murderer is him√’: Multimodal humor in danmu video comments.” Internet Pragmatics 4(2): 272–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Nan
2015 “巴赫金狂欢理论视域下的弹幕文化 [ Danmu culture from the perspective of Bakhtin’s Carnival Theory].” 今传媒 [ Today’s Mass Media ] 23(10): 121–122.Google Scholar
Zhang, Wei, and Chaoqun Xie
2015 “网络语境下不礼貌语用与身份建构分析——以微博研究为例 [A pragmatic approach to impoliteness and identity construction in cyber context: A case analysis of Weibo].” 当代外语研究 [ Contemporary Foreign Language Studies ] (5): 23–28, 34.Google Scholar