Cover not available
Article published In:
Formality and Informality in Online Performances
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Susanne Mühleisen
[Internet Pragmatics 5:1] 2022
► pp. 143–164

Multimodal strategies for balancing formality and informality

The role of kaomoji in online comment-reply interactions

| Old Dominion University
This paper investigates multimodal strategies for balancing formality and informality online. The analysis of 300 comment-reply interactions on a recipe sharing site in Japan demonstrates that writers tend to avoid being overly formal or informal in their messages. For example, most comments and replies are written in polite forms but many incorporate some plain forms and colloquial expressions. Linguistic features, however, are not the only way through which the writers manage an appropriate level of formality and informality. The study examines the role of kaomoji or Japanese-style emoticons for socio-relational work online. Some kaomoji function locally as cues for interpreting the sentences featuring kaomoji. All kaomoji, including those with local functions, work to enhance the social presence of the writers on the screen via pictographic gaze and gestures, which increases the perception of intimate rapport. The findings underscore the importance of a multimodal perspective in examining how people handle social relationships online.
Keywords: multimodal analysis, formality-informality, kaomoji , emoticon, social presence, human agency, politeness, Japanese language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Linguistic and multimodal politeness and intimacy in face-to-face interaction
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.The role of kaomoji in online comment-reply interaction
    • 4.1Types of kaomoji
    • 4.2 Kaomoji and linguistic politeness
    • 4.3Local and global functions of kaomoji
      • 4.3.1Functions of kaomoji in comments
      • 4.3.2Global function of kaomoji in replies
    • 4.4Non-kaomoji users’ comments and replies
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00071.kan
References (40)
References
Al Rashdi, Fathiya. 2018. “Functions of emojis in WhatsApp interaction among Omanis.” Discourse, Context & Media 261: 117–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Peter A., Laura K. Guerrero, and Susanne M. Jones. 2006. “Nonverbal behavior in intimate interactions and intimate relationships.” In The SAGE Handbook of Nonverbal Communication, ed. by Valerie Manusov, and Miles Patterson, 259–278. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baym, Nancy K. 1998. “The emergence of on-line community.” In Cybersociety 2: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community, ed. by Steve Jones, 35–68. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lucien, and Bodo Winter. 2018. “Multimodal indexicality in Korean: ‘Doing deference’ and ‘performing intimacy’ through nonverbal behavior.” Journal of Politeness Research 15(1): 25–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Haruko M. 2008. Socializing Identities through Speech Style: Learners of Japanese as a Foreign Language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fouser, Robert, Narahiko Inoue, and Chungmin Lee. 2000. “The pragmatics of orality in English, Japanese and Korean computer-mediated communication.” In Words on the Web, ed. by Lynne Pemberton, and Simon Shurville, 52–62. Wiltshire: Cromwell Press.Google Scholar
Geenan, Jarret, Sigrid Norris, and Boonyalakha Makboon. 2015. “Multimodal discourse analysis.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1037–1053. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geyer, Naomi. 2013. “Discernment and variation: The action-oriented use of Japanese addressee honorifics.” Multilingua 32(2): 155–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. “Contextualization and understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, Andy. 2012. “Patterns of emoticon usage in ESL students’ discussion forum writing.” CALICO Journal 29(4): 694–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
High, Andrew C., and Scott E. Caplan. 2009. “Social anxiety and computer-mediated communication during initial interactions: Implications for the hyperpersonal perspective.” Computers in Human Behavior 251: 475–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hijirida, Kyoko, and Ho-min Sohn. 1986. “Cross-cultural patterns of honorifics and sociolinguistic sensitivity to honorific variables: Evidence from English, Japanese, and Korean.” Papers in Linguistics 19(3): 365–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1979. “Formality and informality in communicative events.” American Anthropologist 811: 773–790. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, Carey. 2014. “An introduction to multimodality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (2nd edn.), ed. by Carey Jewitt, 15–30. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey, Jeff Bezemer, and Kay O’Halloran. 2016. Introducing Multimodality. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaneyasu, Michiko, and Minako Kuhara. 2020. “Regularity and variation in Japanese recipes: A comparative analysis of cookbook, online, and user-generated sub-registers.” Register Studies 2(1): 37–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katsuno, Hirofumi, and Christine R. Yano. 2002. “Face to face: Online subjectivity in contemporary Japan.” Asian Studies Review 26(2): 205–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kavanagh, Barry. 2010. “A cross-cultural analysis of Japanese and English non-verbal online communication: The use of emoticons in weblogs.” Intercultural Communication Studies 19(3): 65–80.Google Scholar
. 2012. “The use of unconventional means of communication in Japanese and American blog comments.” In Typological Studies on Languages in Thailand and Japan, ed. by Tadao Miyamoto, Naoyuki Ono, Kingkarn Thepkanjana, and Satoshi Uehara, 173–195. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobou.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther R. 1993. “Against arbitrariness: The social production of the sign as a foundational issue in critical discourse analysis.” Discourse & Society 41: 169–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
2012. “Multimodal discourse analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by James Paul Gee and Michael Handford, 35–50. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther R., and Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Martinec, Radan, and Andrew Salway. 2005. “A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media.” Visual Communication 4(3): 337–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd. 2010. “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Paul K. 2002. “Negotiation of identity and power in a Japanese online discourse community.” Computers and Composition 191: 39–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 2008. “Playing with multiple voices: Emotivity and creativity in Japanese style mixture.” In Style Shifting in Japanese, ed. by Kimberly Jones, and Tsuyoshi Ono, 91–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishimura, Yukiko. 2007. “Linguistic innovations and interactional features in Japanese BBS communication.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 163–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1987. “Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2): 101–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schnoebelen, Tyler J. 2012. “Emotions are relational: Positioning and the use of affective linguistic resources.” Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Short, John S., Ederyn Williams, and Bruce Christie. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Spina, Stefania. 2019. “Role of emoticons as structural markers in Twitter interactions.” Discourse Processes 56(4): 345–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugimoto, Taku, and James A. Levin. 2000. “Multiple literacies and multimedia: A comparison of Japanese and American uses of the Internet.” In Global Literacies and the World-Wide Web, ed. by Gail E. Hawisher, and Cynthia L. Selfe, 133–153. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Unsworth, Len. 2006. “Towards a metalanguage for multiliteracies education: Describing the meaning-making resources of language-image interaction.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 5(1): 55–76.Google Scholar
Yamada, Masanori, and Kanji Akahori. 2007. “Social presence in synchronous CMC-based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives?” Computer Assisted Language Learning 20(1): 37–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamazaki, Jane W. 2002. “Global and local in computer-mediated communication: A Japanese newsgroup.” In Exploring Japaneseness: On Japanese Enactments of Culture and Consciousness, ed. by Ray T. Donahue, 425–442. Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Kaneyasu, Michiko
2024. Final tteyuu as a mockery stance marker: Multifunctionality and ongoing semantic change in Japanese social media. Journal of Pragmatics 221 ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Leticia-Tian & Daniel Cassany
2023. From writing to drawing: Examining visual composition in danmu-mediated textual communication. Discourse, Context & Media 53 ► pp. 100699 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Yiqiong, Susan C Herring, Rongle Tan, Qingwen Zhang & Dingxu Shi
2023. From compensation to competition: The impact of graphicons on language use in a Chinese context. Discourse & Communication 17:6 ► pp. 764 ff. DOI logo
Jeon, Hye-Jin
2022. Does the relationship between brand attitude, brand attachment and purchase intention vary based on the type of prosocial expression-based brand emoji?. Journal of Product & Brand Management 31:8 ► pp. 1180 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.