This paper investigates multimodal strategies for balancing formality and informality online. The analysis of 300 comment-reply interactions on a recipe sharing site in Japan demonstrates that writers tend to avoid being overly formal or informal in their messages. For example, most comments and replies are written in polite forms but many incorporate some plain forms and colloquial expressions. Linguistic features, however, are not the only way through which the writers manage an appropriate level of formality and informality. The study examines the role of kaomoji or Japanese-style emoticons for socio-relational work online. Some kaomoji function locally as cues for interpreting the sentences featuring kaomoji. All kaomoji, including those with local functions, work to enhance the social presence of the writers on the screen via pictographic gaze and gestures, which increases the perception of intimate rapport. The findings underscore the importance of a multimodal perspective in examining how people handle social relationships online.
Al Rashdi, Fathiya. 2018. “Functions of emojis in WhatsApp interaction among Omanis.” Discourse, Context & Media 261: 117–126.
Andersen, Peter A., Laura K. Guerrero, and Susanne M. Jones. 2006. “Nonverbal behavior in intimate interactions and intimate relationships.” In The SAGE Handbook of Nonverbal Communication, ed. by Valerie Manusov, and Miles Patterson, 259–278. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Baym, Nancy K.1998. “The emergence of on-line community.” In Cybersociety 2: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community, ed. by Steve Jones, 35–68. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Brown, Lucien, and Bodo Winter. 2018. “Multimodal indexicality in Korean: ‘Doing deference’ and ‘performing intimacy’ through nonverbal behavior.” Journal of Politeness Research 15(1): 25–54.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cook, Haruko M.2008. Socializing Identities through Speech Style: Learners of Japanese as a Foreign Language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fouser, Robert, Narahiko Inoue, and Chungmin Lee. 2000. “The pragmatics of orality in English, Japanese and Korean computer-mediated communication.” In Words on the Web, ed. by Lynne Pemberton, and Simon Shurville, 52–62. Wiltshire: Cromwell Press.
Geenan, Jarret, Sigrid Norris, and Boonyalakha Makboon. 2015. “Multimodal discourse analysis.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1037–1053. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Geyer, Naomi. 2013. “Discernment and variation: The action-oriented use of Japanese addressee honorifics.” Multilingua 32(2): 155–176.
Gumperz, John J.1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, John J.1992. “Contextualization and understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halvorsen, Andy. 2012. “Patterns of emoticon usage in ESL students’ discussion forum writing.” CALICO Journal 29(4): 694–717.
High, Andrew C., and Scott E. Caplan. 2009. “Social anxiety and computer-mediated communication during initial interactions: Implications for the hyperpersonal perspective.” Computers in Human Behavior 251: 475–482.
Hijirida, Kyoko, and Ho-min Sohn. 1986. “Cross-cultural patterns of honorifics and sociolinguistic sensitivity to honorific variables: Evidence from English, Japanese, and Korean.” Papers in Linguistics 19(3): 365–401.
Irvine, Judith T.1979. “Formality and informality in communicative events.” American Anthropologist 811: 773–790.
Jewitt, Carey. 2014. “An introduction to multimodality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (2nd edn.), ed. by Carey Jewitt, 15–30. Abingdon: Routledge.
Jewitt, Carey, Jeff Bezemer, and Kay O’Halloran. 2016. Introducing Multimodality. Abingdon: Routledge.
Katsuno, Hirofumi, and Christine R. Yano. 2002. “Face to face: Online subjectivity in contemporary Japan.” Asian Studies Review 26(2): 205–231.
Kavanagh, Barry. 2010. “A cross-cultural analysis of Japanese and English non-verbal online communication: The use of emoticons in weblogs.” Intercultural Communication Studies 19(3): 65–80.
Kavanagh, Barry. 2012. “The use of unconventional means of communication in Japanese and American blog comments.” In Typological Studies on Languages in Thailand and Japan, ed. by Tadao Miyamoto, Naoyuki Ono, Kingkarn Thepkanjana, and Satoshi Uehara, 173–195. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobou.
Kress, Gunther R.1993. “Against arbitrariness: The social production of the sign as a foundational issue in critical discourse analysis.” Discourse & Society 41: 169–191.
Kress, Gunther R.2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kress, Gunther R.2012. “Multimodal discourse analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by James Paul Gee and Michael Handford, 35–50. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kress, Gunther R., and Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
Martinec, Radan, and Andrew Salway. 2005. “A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media.” Visual Communication 4(3): 337–371.
Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd. 2010. “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133.
Matsuda, Paul K.2002. “Negotiation of identity and power in a Japanese online discourse community.” Computers and Composition 191: 39–55.
Nishimura, Yukiko. 2007. “Linguistic innovations and interactional features in Japanese BBS communication.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 163–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.1987. “Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2): 101–114.
Schnoebelen, Tyler J.2012. “Emotions are relational: Positioning and the use of affective linguistic resources.” Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
Short, John S., Ederyn Williams, and Bruce Christie. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Spina, Stefania. 2019. “Role of emoticons as structural markers in Twitter interactions.” Discourse Processes 56(4): 345–362.
Sugimoto, Taku, and James A. Levin. 2000. “Multiple literacies and multimedia: A comparison of Japanese and American uses of the Internet.” In Global Literacies and the World-Wide Web, ed. by Gail E. Hawisher, and Cynthia L. Selfe, 133–153. London: Routledge.
Unsworth, Len. 2006. “Towards a metalanguage for multiliteracies education: Describing the meaning-making resources of language-image interaction.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 5(1): 55–76.
Yamada, Masanori, and Kanji Akahori. 2007. “Social presence in synchronous CMC-based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives?” Computer Assisted Language Learning 20(1): 37–65.
Yamazaki, Jane W.2002. “Global and local in computer-mediated communication: A Japanese newsgroup.” In Exploring Japaneseness: On Japanese Enactments of Culture and Consciousness, ed. by Ray T. Donahue, 425–442. Westport, CT: Ablex.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Kaneyasu, Michiko
2024. Final tteyuu as a mockery stance marker: Multifunctionality and ongoing semantic change in Japanese social media. Journal of Pragmatics 221 ► pp. 13 ff.
Zhang, Leticia-Tian & Daniel Cassany
2023. From writing to drawing: Examining visual composition in danmu-mediated textual communication. Discourse, Context & Media 53 ► pp. 100699 ff.
Zhang, Yiqiong, Susan C Herring, Rongle Tan, Qingwen Zhang & Dingxu Shi
2023. From compensation to competition: The impact of graphicons on language use in a Chinese context. Discourse & Communication 17:6 ► pp. 764 ff.
Jeon, Hye-Jin
2022. Does the relationship between brand attitude, brand attachment and purchase intention vary based on the type of prosocial expression-based brand emoji?. Journal of Product & Brand Management 31:8 ► pp. 1180 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.