Cover not available
Article published In:
Hate Speech in Online Media
Edited by Anton Granvik, Mélanie Buchart and Hartmut Lenk
[Internet Pragmatics 6:2] 2023
► pp. 156–172

Linguistic and discursive properties of hate speech and speech facilitating the expression of hatred

Evidence from Finnish and French online discussion boards

| University of Helsinki
Examples of posts from three Finnish (236 posts) and one French (410 posts) discussion threads are analyzed with regard to lexicon, grammar, speech acts, and topoi. The aim is to illustrate the different means used to express hatred or speech pertaining to ideological and thematic spaces in which the expression of hatred may be legitimized. The examples represent everyday discourse, which is an influential arena for the materialization of ideologies. Given the lack of linguistic and discursive tools used exclusively to express or legitimize hatred, doing research on hate speech always entails taking a specific ideological stance: neither linguistics nor pragmatics or discourse studies can provide a definition of hate speech that is valid in all contexts. Triangulating different methodological and theoretical perspectives is necessary to produce convincing research results.
Keywords: hate speech, expression of hatred, online discussion board, ideology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Goals, data, and methods
  • 2.Words
  • 3.Grammatical phenomena
  • 4.Speech acts
  • 5.Discussion: From speech acts to ideology and discourse
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 18 September 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00094.maa
References (41)
References
Amossy, Ruth. 2012. L’argumentation dans le discours [Argumentation in Discourse]. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude. 1995. “La théorie des topoï : sémantique ou rhétorique ? [The theory of topoi: Semantics or rhetoric?].” Hermès, La Revue 15(1): 185–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955 (2nd edn.), ed by J. O. Urmson, and Marina Sbisà. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Michael J. 2015. “Ingroups and outgroups.” In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism, ed. by John Stone, Rutledge M. Dennis, Polly Rizova, Anthony D. Smith, and Xiaoshuo Hou. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, Peter. 2003. “Le centrage du verbe transitif [Centering the transitive verb].” Syntaxe et sémantique 1(4): 15–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power, ed. by John Thompson, trans. by Gino Raymond, and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Croom, Adam M. 2016. “An assessment of the negative and positive aspects of stereotypes and the derogatory and non-derogatory uses of slurs.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone, and Jacob L. Mey, 791–822. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Courtine, Jean-Jacques. 1981. “Quelques problèmes théoriques et méthodologiques en analyse du discours. À propos du discours communiste adressé aux chrétiens [Some theoretical and methodological problems in discourse analysis. About communist discourse addressed to Christians].” Langages 621: 9–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Limited Inc, ed. by Gerald Graff, trans. by Samuel Weber, and Jeffrey Mehlman. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley E. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretative Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1982. “With the compliments of the author: Reflections on Austin and Derrida.” Critical Inquiry 8(4): 693–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech, and It’s a Good Thing, Too. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forti, Steven. 2021. Extrema derecha 2.0. Qué es y cómo combatirla [Extreme Right 2.0: What Is It and How to Fight against It]. Madrid: Siglo XXI de España.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. Archaeology of Knowledge, trans. by. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1976. “Anti-languages.” American Anthropologist 78(3): 570–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Johansson, Marjut. 2017. “Everyday opinions in news discussion forums: Public vernacular discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media 191: 5–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. “Rules for ritual insults.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 120–169. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Laitinen, Lea. 1995. “Nollapersoona [The zero person].” Virittäjä 991: 337–358.Google Scholar
Määttä, Simo. 2023a. “Circulation [Circulation].” In Discours de haine et de radicalisation. Les notions clés [Discourse of Hate and Radicalization: The Key Concepts], ed. by Nolwenn Lorenzi Bailly, and Claudine Moïse, 19–30. Lyon: ENS Éditions. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023b. “Performativité [Performativity].” In Discours de haine et des radicalisations. Un glossaire des notions [Discourse of Hate and Radicalization: The Key Concepts], ed. by Nolwenn Lorenzi Bailly, and Claudine Moïse, 81–87. Lyon: ENS Éditions. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Määttä, Simo, and Yrjö Lauranto. 2022. “Eriävän ja myötämielisen mielipiteen esittäminen sukupuoli- ja seksuaalivähemmistöjä koskevissa Suomi24-keskusteluissa [Expression of agreement and disagreement in discussion threads related to gender and sexual minorities on the Suomi24 discussion board].” Virittäjä 126(2): 205–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Määttä, Simo, Karita Suomalainen, and Ulla Tuomarla. 2020. “Maahanmuuttovastaisen ideologian ja ryhmäidentiteetin rakentuminen Suomi24-keskustelussa [Constructing anti-immigration ideology and group identity in an online conversation thread on the Suomi24 discussion board].” Virittäjä 124(2): 190–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Everyday discourse as a space of citizenship: The linguistic construction of in-groups and out-groups in online discussion boards.” Citizenship Studies 25(6): 773–790. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Määttä, Simo, and Samuel Vernet. 2023. “Reacting to homophobia in a French online discussion: The fuzzy boundaries between heteronormativity and homophobia.” Discourse & Society 34(5): 617–635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maingueneau, Dominique. 1991. L’analyse du discours. Introduction aux études de l’archive [Discourse Analysis: Introduction to the Study of the Archive]. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Oliver, Sophie. 2011. “Dehumanization: Perceiving the body as (in)human.” In Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization: Human Dignity Violated, ed. by Paulus Kaufmann, Hannes Kuch, Christian Neuhäuser, and Elaine Webster, 85–97. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascale, Celine-Marie. 2019. “The weaponization of language: Discourses of rising right-wing authoritarianism.” Current Sociology 67(6): 898–917. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pye, Michael. 1994. MacMillan Dictionary of Religion. London: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Revol, Thierry. 2003. “Contre nature [Against nature].” In Dictionnaire de l’homophobie [Dictionary of Homophobia], ed. by Louis-Georges Tin, 108–109. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Shore, Susanna. 1988. “On the so-called Finnish passive.” Word 39(3): 151–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. “Language structure and linguistic ideology.” In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, ed. by Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, and Carol L. Hofbauer, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 1993. Language, Ideology, and Point of View. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. Elite Discourse and Racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vernet, Samuel, and Simo Määttä. 2021. “Modalités syntaxiques et argumentatives du discours homophobe en ligne: chroniques de la haine ordinaire [Syntactic and argumentative modalities of homophobic discourse online : Chronicles of everyday hate].” Mots – Les langages du politique 1251: 35–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VISK. 2008. Ison suomen kieliopin verkkoversio [Online Version of the Extensive Grammar of Finnish]. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus. [URL]
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “The Discourse-historical approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 63–99. London: Sage.Google Scholar