Article published In:
Internet Pragmatics: Online-First Articles

Flirting and winking in Tinder chats

Emoji, ambiguity, and sequential actions

| University College London
Existing research across the diverse field(s) of ‘discourse studies’ has started to explore the communicative orders and sequential practices surrounding emoji use (Skovholt, Grønning and Kankaanranta 2014; Herring and Dainas 2017; Gibson, Huang and Yu 2018; Sampietro 2019). However, researchers have not yet systematically analysed one of the demonstrable phenomena of emoji, which is their ambiguity as meaning-making devices (Miller et al. 2016; Jaeger et al. 2017). This study draws on Conversation Analysis to explore the issue of ambiguity in the use of one particular type of emoji, the wink (e.g., 😉, 🥴, 😜). Drawing on a data corpus of text conversations in Danish and in Spanish by users of the dating app ‘Tinder’, the analysis explores the phenomena of ambiguity in relation to the practice of flirting. The paper highlights four possible sources of ambiguity: idiosyncratic use, semiotic references, sequential placement, and relationship to ambiguous textual actions. The paper ends with reflections on possible future areas of research in the study of emoji and communication.
Keywords: emoji, Conversation Analysis, Tinder, flirting, ambiguity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Emoji and communicative action
    • 1.2Tinder
    • 1.3Flirting
  • 2.The study
    • 2.1Design of the study
    • 2.2Analytic process and framework
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Idiosyncrasy, repair and accountability
    • 3.2Ambiguity in ‘flirting’ and ‘winking’
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Ambiguity and emoji
    • 4.2Implications and further research
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 15 February 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00107.gib
References (53)
References
Alshenqeeti, Hamza. 2016. “Are emojis creating a new or old visual language for new generations? A socio-semiotic study.” Advances in Language and Literacy Studies 7(6): 56–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, Jodi Eisterhold, Jennifer Hay, and Isabella Poggi. 2003. “Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 16(2): 243–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aull, Bethany. 2019. “A study of phatic emoji use in WhatsApp communication.” Internet Pragmatics 2(2): 206–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron, Naomi S. 2004. “See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23(4): 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, Dana, Justine Tinkler, Alana Peck, and Lynnette Coto. 2021. “Tinder: A game with gendered rules and consequences.” Social Currents 8(5): 491–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2016. The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ditchfield, Hannah. 2020. “Behind the screen of Facebook: Identity construction in the rehearsal stage of online interaction.” New Media & Society 22(6): 927–943. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring. 2010. “Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force.” Communication Theory 201: 249–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Richard, William Housley, and Carly Butler. 2009. “Omnirelevance and interactional context.” Australian Journal of Communication 36(3): 45–64.Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren, and Gretchen McCulloch. 2019. “Emoji as digital gestures.” Language@Internet, 17, article 2. [URL] (accessed 6 June 2020).
Ge-stadnyk, Jing. 2021. “Communicative functions of emoji sequences in the context of self-presentation: A comparative study of Weibo and Twitter users.” Discourse & Communication 15(4): 369–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ge, Jing, and Susan C. Herring. 2018. “Communicative functions of emoji sequences on Sina Weibo.” First Monday 23(11). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Will, Pingping Huang, and Qianyun Yu. 2018. “Emoji and communicative action: The semiotics, sequence and gestural actions of ‘face covering hand’.” Discourse, Context & Media 261: 91–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, David, Wyke Stommel, Trena Paulus, Jessica Lester, and Darren Reed. 2015. “Microanalysis of online data: The methodological development of ‘digital CA’.” Discourse, Context & Media 71: 45–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Patrick Georg, Gabriel Greenberg, Christian De Leon, and Elsi Kaiser. 2023. “A semantics of face emoji in discourse.” Linguistics and Philosophy 46(4): 905–957. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C., and Ashley Dainas. 2017. “‘Nice picture comment!’: Graphicons in Facebook comment threads.” In Proceedings of the Fiftieth Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-50), 2185–2194. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewson, Claire, Carl Vogel, and Dianna Laurent. 2015. Internet Research Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hopper, Robert. 2002. Gendering Talk. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Sara R., Yixun Xia, Pui-Yee Lee, Denise C. Hunter, Michelle K. Beresford, and Gastón Ares. 2017. “Emoji questionnaires can be used with a range of population segments: Findings relating to age, gender and frequency of emoji/emoticon use.” Food Quality and Preference 681: 397–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Graham M., and Bambi B. Schieffelin. 2009. “Talking text and talking back: ‘My BFF Jill’ from Boob Tube to YouTube.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(4): 1050–1079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Komrsková, Zuzana. 2015. “The use of emoticons in polite phrases of greetings and thanks.” International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 9(4): 1309–1312.Google Scholar
König, K. 2019. “Stance taking with ‘laugh’ particles and emojis – Sequential and functional patterns of ‘laughter’ in a corpus of German WhatsApp chats.” Journal of Pragmatics 1421: 156–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korobov, Neill, and Justin Laplante. 2013. “Using improprieties to pursue intimacy in speed-dating interactions.” Red Fame 1(1): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Li, and Yue Yang. 2018. “Pragmatic functions of emoji in internet-based communication: A corpus-based study.” Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 3(16): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, Christian. 2020. “Liquidity and attachment in the mobile hookup culture: A comparative study of contrasted interactional patterns in the main uses of Grindr and Tinder.” Journal of Cultural Economy 13(1): 73–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lo, Shao-Kang. 2008. “The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 11(5): 595–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, Ying, and Jan Blommaert. 2020. “Understanding memes on Chinese social media: Biaoqing.” Chinese Language and Discourse 11(2): 226–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markman, and Sae Oshima. 2007. “Pragmatic play? Some possible functions of English emoticons and Japanese kaomoji in computer-mediated discourse.” In Proceedings of the Association of Internet Researchers Annual Conference 8.0: Let’s Play! 18 October, 1–19. Vancouver, BC Canada.Google Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina, and David M. Frohlich. 2020. “A pragmatics of intimacy.” Internet Pragmatics 3(1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meredith, Joanne, David Giles, and Wyke Stommel. 2021. Analysing Digital Interaction. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Hannah, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Shuo Chang, Isaac Johnson, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2016. “‘Blissfully happy’ or ‘ready to fight’: Varying interpretations of emoji.” Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2016): 259–268.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Kristine Køhler. 2017. “Flirting in online dating: Giving empirical grounds to flirtatious implicitness.” Discourse Studies 19(5): 581–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2020. “Coming out – seducing – flirting: Shedding light on sexual speech acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 1701: 256–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkwell, Corina. 2019. “Emoji as social semiotic resources for meaning-making in discourse: Mapping the functions of the toilet emoji in Cher’s Tweets about Donald Trump.” Discourse, Context & Media 301, 100307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paulus, Trena, Amber Warren, and Jessica Nina Lester. 2016. “Applying conversation analysis methods to online talk: A literature review.” Discourse, Context & Media 121: 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petitjean, Cécile, and Etienne Morel. 2017. “‘Hahaha’: Laughter as a resource to manage WhatsApp conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 1101: 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pojanapunya, Punjaporn, and Kandaporn Jaroenkitboworn. 2011. “How to say ‘good-bye’ in second life.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3591–3602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radley, Alan. 2003. “Flirting.” In Discourse, the Body, and Identity, ed. by Justine Coupland, and Richard Gwyn, 70–86. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rintel, Sean. 2015. “Omnirelevance in technologised interaction: Couples coping with video calling distortions.” In Advances in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by Richard Fitzgerald, and William Housley, 123–150. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca-Cuberes, Carles, Will Gibson, and Michael Mora-Rodriguez. 2023. “Relationship initiation and formation in post-match Tinder chat conversations.” Discourse & Communication 17(4): 462–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z. 1982. “The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy.” Language in Society 11(2): 203–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50(4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sampietro, Agnese. 2016a. “Emoticonos y Emojis: Análisis de Su Historia, Difusión y Uso En La Comunicación Digital Actual [Emoticons and emojis: Analysis of their history, diffusion and use in current digital communication].” PhD dissertation, University of Valencia. [URL] (accessed 4 March 2020).
. 2016b. “Emoticonos y Multimodalidad. El Uso Del Pulgar Hacia Arriba En Whatsapp [Emoticons and multimodality: The use of the thumbs up on Whatsapp].” Aposta Revista de Ciencias Sociales 691: 271–295. [URL]. (accessed 6 July 2021).
. 2016c. “Exploring the punctuation effect of emoji in Spanish WhatsApp chats.” Lenguas Modernas 471: 91–113.Google Scholar
. 2019. “Emoji and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats.” Journal of Pragmatics 1431: 109–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schnoebelen, Tyler Joseph. 2012. “Emoticons are relational: Positioning and the use of affective linguistic resources.” PhD dissertation, University of Stanford. [URL] (accessed 9 July 2019).
Skovholt, Karianne, Anette Grønning, and Anne Kankaanranta. 2014. “The communicative functions of emoticons in workplace e-mails: :-).” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(4): 780–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speer, Susan A. 2017. “Flirting: A designedly ambiguous action?” Research on Language and Social Interaction 50(2): 128–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2010. “‘Have you been married, or …?’: Eliciting and accounting for relationship histories in speed-dating interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 40(3): 260–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitty, Monica Therese. 2003. “Cyber-flirting playing at love on the internet.” Theory & Psychology 13(3): 339–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2014. “Not all emoticons are created equal.” Linguagem em (Dis)curso 14(3): 511–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar