Article published In:
IPrA Papers in PragmaticsVol. 4:1/2 (1990) ► pp.183–196
On formulating reference
An interactional approach to relative clauses in English conversation
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Clancy, P
1980 Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In W. Chafe (ed.) The Pear Stories. New Jersey: Ablex.
Du Bois, J
1980 "Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse." In W. Chafe (ed.) The Pear Stories. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
Duranti, A
1984 The social meaning of subject pronouns in Italian conversation. Text 41: 277-311. 
Fillmore, C
1977 Topics in lexical semantics. In R. Cole (ed.) Current issues in linguistic theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fox, B
1987a The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy revisited: subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis? Language 631: 856-870.
Fox, B. and S. Thompson
1990 "A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation." Language 661: 51-64.
Givon, T
Goodwin, C
1979 "The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation." In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers.
Grosz, B
1977 The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. Stanford Research Institute Technical Notes 5.
Linde, C
1979 Focus of attention and the choice of pronouns in discourse. In T. Givon (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, vol 12. New York: Academic Press.
Prince, E
1981 Toward a taxonomy of given and new information. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. BoP
Redecker, G
1987 Introductions of story characters in interactive and non-interactive narration. In J. Verscheuren and M. Bertucelli-Papi (eds.) The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Reichman, R
1981 Plain speaking: a theory and grammar of spontaneous discourse. Cambridge, Mass: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, report 4681.
Sacks, H
1972 On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. BoP
Sacks, H. and E. Schegloff
1979 Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.
Schegloff, E
1972 Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In D. Sudnow (ed) Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Academic Press.
Tannen, D
1979 What's in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In R. Freedle (ed.) New Directions in Discourse Processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Wertsch, J
(ed.) 1986 Culture, communication, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
Bolkestein, A.Machtelt
1991. Syntax and pragmatics: Apartheid or integration?. Journal of Pragmatics 16:2 ► pp. 107 ff. 
Fox, Barbara A.
1994. Contextualization, indexicality, and the distributed nature of grammar. Language Sciences 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Geisler, Christer
1998. Infinitival relative clauses in spoken discourse. Language Variation and Change 10:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Lelandais, Manon & Gaëlle Ferré
2014. Multimodal Analysis of Parentheticals in Conversational Speech. Multimodal Communication 3:2
McDonnell, Bradley
2020. Chapter 10. The pragmatics of ‘light nouns’ in Besemah. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128], ► pp. 238 ff.
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
1996. Interaction and Syntax in the Structure of Conversational Discourse: Collaboration, Overlap, and Syntactic Dissociation. In Computational and Conversational Discourse [NATO ASI Series, 151], ► pp. 67 ff.
연재훈
2012. A functional-typological study on Korean relative clauses. Journal of Korean Linguistics null:63 ► pp. 413 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.