Article published In:
IPrA Papers in PragmaticsVol. 4:1/2 (1990) ► pp.183–196
On formulating reference
An interactional approach to relative clauses in English conversation
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Clancy, P
1980 Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In W. Chafe (ed.) The Pear Stories. New Jersey: Ablex.
Du Bois, J
1980 "Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse." In W. Chafe (ed.) The Pear Stories. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
Duranti, A
1984 The social meaning of subject pronouns in Italian conversation. Text 41: 277-311. 
Fillmore, C
1977 Topics in lexical semantics. In R. Cole (ed.) Current issues in linguistic theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fox, B
1987a The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy revisited: subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis? Language 631: 856-870.
Fox, B. and S. Thompson
1990 "A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation." Language 661: 51-64.
Givon, T
Goodwin, C
1979 "The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation." In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers.
Grosz, B
1977 The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. Stanford Research Institute Technical Notes 5.
Linde, C
1979 Focus of attention and the choice of pronouns in discourse. In T. Givon (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, vol 12. New York: Academic Press.
Prince, E
1981 Toward a taxonomy of given and new information. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. BoP
Redecker, G
1987 Introductions of story characters in interactive and non-interactive narration. In J. Verscheuren and M. Bertucelli-Papi (eds.) The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Reichman, R
1981 Plain speaking: a theory and grammar of spontaneous discourse. Cambridge, Mass: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, report 4681.
Sacks, H
1972 On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. BoP
Sacks, H. and E. Schegloff
1979 Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.
Schegloff, E
1972 Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In D. Sudnow (ed) Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Academic Press.
Tannen, D
1979 What's in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In R. Freedle (ed.) New Directions in Discourse Processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Wertsch, J
(ed.) 1986 Culture, communication, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
Bolkestein, A.Machtelt
1991. Syntax and pragmatics: Apartheid or integration?. Journal of Pragmatics 16:2 ► pp. 107 ff. 
Fox, Barbara A.
1994. Contextualization, indexicality, and the distributed nature of grammar. Language Sciences 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Geisler, Christer
1998. Infinitival relative clauses in spoken discourse. Language Variation and Change 10:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Lelandais, Manon & Gaëlle Ferré
2014. Multimodal Analysis of Parentheticals in Conversational Speech. Multimodal Communication 3:2
McDonnell, Bradley
2020. Chapter 10. The pragmatics of ‘light nouns’ in Besemah. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128], ► pp. 238 ff.
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
1996. Interaction and Syntax in the Structure of Conversational Discourse: Collaboration, Overlap, and Syntactic Dissociation. In Computational and Conversational Discourse [NATO ASI Series, 151], ► pp. 67 ff.
연재훈
2012. A functional-typological study on Korean relative clauses. Journal of Korean Linguistics null:63 ► pp. 413 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.