Article published In:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 14:1 (2013) ► pp.6280
Cited by

Cited by 17 other publications

Allen, M.L. & E. Armitage
2017. How Children Learn to Navigate the Symbolic World of Pictures [Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 52],  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Bohn, Manuel, Josep Call & Michael Tomasello
2016. Comprehension of iconic gestures by chimpanzees and human children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 142  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fridland, Ellen & Richard Moore
2015. Imitation reconsidered. Philosophical Psychology 28:6  pp. 856 ff. DOI logo
Hoicka, Elena
2016. Parents and toddlers distinguish joke, pretend and literal intentional contexts through communicative and referential cues. Journal of Pragmatics 95  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Ishikawa, Mitsuhiko, Atsushi Senju & Shoji Itakura
2020. Learning Process of Gaze Following: Computational Modeling Based on Reinforcement Learning. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Kano, Fumihiro, Richard Moore, Christopher Krupenye, Satoshi Hirata, Masaki Tomonaga & Josep Call
2018. Human ostensive signals do not enhance gaze following in chimpanzees, but do enhance object-oriented attention. Animal Cognition 21:5  pp. 715 ff. DOI logo
Kliesch, Christian, Eugenio Parise, Vincent Reid & Stefanie Hoehl
2022. The role of social signals in segmenting observed actions in 18‐month‐old children. Developmental Science 25:3 DOI logo
Moore, Richard
2014. Ontogenetic Constraints on Grice’s Theory of Communication. In Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 10],  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
2016. Gricean Communication and Cognitive Development. The Philosophical Quarterly  pp. pqw049 ff. DOI logo
2016. Meaning and ostension in great ape gestural communication. Animal Cognition 19:1  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
2018. Gricean communication, language development, and animal minds. Philosophy Compass 13:12  pp. e12550 ff. DOI logo
Moore, Richard, Josep Call, Michael Tomasello & Juliane Kaminski
2015. Production and Comprehension of Gestures between Orang-Utans (Pongo pygmaeus) in a Referential Communication Game. PLOS ONE 10:6  pp. e0129726 ff. DOI logo
Moore, Richard, Bettina Mueller, Juliane Kaminski & Michael Tomasello
2015. Two-year-old children but not domestic dogs understand communicative intentions without language, gestures, or gaze. Developmental Science 18:2  pp. 232 ff. DOI logo
Scott-Phillips, Thomas C.
2015. Nonhuman Primate Communication, Pragmatics, and the Origins of Language. Current Anthropology 56:1  pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
2016. Meaning in great ape communication: summarising the debate. Animal Cognition 19:1  pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Vollmer, Anna-Lisa, Britta Wrede, Katharina J. Rohlfing & Pierre-Yves Oudeyer
2016. Pragmatic Frames for Teaching and Learning in Human–Robot Interaction: Review and Challenges. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 10 DOI logo
Zlatev, Jordan, Elainie Alenkær Madsen, Sara Lenninger, Tomas Persson, Susan Sayehli, Göran Sonesson & Joost van de Weijer
2013. Understanding communicative intentions and semiotic vehicles by children and chimpanzees. Cognitive Development 28:3  pp. 312 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.