Article published in:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 20:2 (2019) ► pp. 339361
References

References

Asmuβ, B. & Oshima, S.
(2012) Negotiation of entitlement in proposal sequences. Discourse Studies 14(1) 67–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barron, B.
(2000) Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9:4 403–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R.; Hughes, J. A.; Randall, D.; Rodden, T.; Sawyer, P.; Shapiro, D. Z. & Sommerville, I.
(1992) Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control. CSCW ’92: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. (pp. 123–129). New York: ACM. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charles, C., Gafni, A. & Whelan, T.
(1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine 44: 681–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(2014) What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics, Special issue on “Approaches to grammar for Interactional Linguistics”, edited by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, pp. 623–648. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Craven, A. and Potter, J.
(2010) Directives: entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12 (4), pp. 419–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curl, T.
(2006) Offers of assistance: constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 1257–1280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curl, T. & Drew, P.
(2008) Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41:2, 129–153, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dourish, P. & Bellotti, V.
(1992) Awareness and coordination in shared workplaces. CSCW ’92, Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. ACM New-York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.; Schuetze-Coburn, S.; Cumming, S. & Paolino, D.
(1993) Outline of discourse transcription. J. A. Edwards & Lampert, M. D. (eds.), Talking data, Transcription and coding in discourse research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 45–89.Google Scholar
Ford, C., Fox, B. & Thompson, S.
(2003) Social interaction and grammar. In: Tomasello, M. (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language, Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 119–144.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A.
(2007) Principles Shaping grammatical practices: an exploration. Discourse Studies, 9:299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, B. & Heinemann, T.
(2016) Rethinking format: an examination of requests. Language in Society 45, 499–531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. & Levy, M.
(2012) Liminality in multitasking: Where talk and task collide in computer collaborations. Language is Society, Vol. 41, issue 5, pp. 557–587. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M. H.
(2006) Participation, Affect, and Trajectory in Family Directive/Response Sequences”, Text & Talk, vol. 26, no. 4–5, pp. 515–543. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. & Goodwin, M. H.
(1992) Assessment and the construction of context. In: Duranti, A., Goodwin, C. (Eds.), Rethinking Context, Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 147–190.Google Scholar
Harper, R. R., Hughes, J. A. & Shapiro, D. Z.
(1989) Working in harmony: An examination of computer technology in air traffic control, in P. Wilson, et al. (eds.): ECSCW’89: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13–15September 1989, Gatwick, London. London, pp. 73–86.Google Scholar
Heap, James L.
(1992) Normative order in collaborative editing. Text in context: contributions to ethnomethodology. Eds. Graham Watson, Robert M. Seiler. Newbury Park: SAGE.Google Scholar
Heath, C. & Luff, P.
(1992) Collaboration and control: crisis management and multimedia technology in London underground line control rooms. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 1, No. 1. 24–48.Google Scholar
Heinemann, T.
(2006) “Will you or can’t you?”: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 1081–1104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(2012) Epistemics in Action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction. Vol. 45 (1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H.
(1987) Establishing agreement: an analysis of proposal-acceptant sequences. Dordrecht and Providence: Foris 1987.Google Scholar
Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R.
(1998) Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press; Oxford (UK) & Malden (MA): Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, Gene H. (Ed). Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. (pp: 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keisanen, T. & Kärkkäinen, E.
2014A multimodal analysis of compliment sequences activity in everyday English interactions. Pragmatics 24(3): 649–672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keyton, J., Ford Debra, J. & Smith Faye, I.
(2008) A Mesolevel Communicative Model of Collaboration. Communication Theory 18: 376–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E.
(2012) I thought it was very interesting. Conversational formats for taking a stance. In Cornillie, Bert & Paola Pietrandrea (eds.), Modality at work: Cognitive, interactional and textual functions of modal markers. Journal of Pragmatics 44(15), 2194–2210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linde, C.
(1988) Who’s in charge here? Cooperative work and authority negotiation in police helicopter missions. Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, 52–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Language, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, K. & Bannon, L.
(2013) Constructing CSCW: The First Quarter Century. Computer Supported-Cooperative Work (2013) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, M.
(2012) Establishing joint decisions in a dyad. Discourse Studies 14 (6), pp. 1–25. Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, M. & Peräkylä, A.
(2012) Deontic Authority in Interaction: the Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide. Research on Language & Social Interaction, Vol 45–3, pp. 297–321 (25). Routledge, Tayler & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Stivers, T. & Rossano, F.
(2010) Mobilizing Response. Research on Language & Social Interaction, Informa UK Limited, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
Stivers, T. & Sidnell, J.
(2005) Introduction: Multimodal Interaction. Semiotica 2005 (156):1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Proposals for Activity Collaboration. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49:2. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uhlířová, L.
(1994) On the role of the PC as a relevant object in face-to-face communication. Journal of Pragmatics Vol. 22 (5). CrossrefGoogle Scholar