Cover not available
Article published In:
How the Brain Got Language: Towards a New Road Map
Edited by Michael A. Arbib
[Interaction Studies 19:1/2] 2018
► pp. 256–271

Archaeology and the evolutionary neuroscience of language

The technological pedagogy hypothesis

| Emory University
Comparative approaches to language evolution are essential but cannot by themselves resolve the timing and context of evolutionary events since the last common ancestor with chimpanzees. Archaeology can help to fill this gap, but only if properly integrated with evolutionary theory and the ethnographic, ethological, and experimental analogies required to reconstruct the broader social, behavioral, and neurocognitive implications of ancient artifacts. The current contribution elaborates a technological pedagogy hypothesis of language origins by developing the concept of an evolving human technological niche and applying it to investigate two key transitions posited by Arbib’s Mirror System Hypothesis: (1) from complex action recognition and imitation to proto-language, and (2) from proto-language to language.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The human technological niche
  • 3.Stone tools and language evolution
    • 3.1Oldowan flake production
    • 3.2From complex action recognition and imitation to proto-language
    • 3.3Acheulean shaping
    • 3.4From proto-language to language
  • 4.Conclusion: Towards a new road map
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 17 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.17033.sto
References (65)
References
Aboitiz, Francisco. (2018). Voice, gesture and working memory in the emergence of speech. Interaction Studies. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abramova, Ekaterina. (2018). The role of pantomime in gestural language evolution, its cognitive bases and an alternative. Journal of Language Evolution. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antón, Susan C., Potts, Richard, & Aiello, Leslie C. (2014). Evolution of early Homo: An integrated biological perspective. Science, 345(6192), 1236828. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arbib, Michael A. (2018). In support of the role of pantomime in language evolution. Journal of Language Evolution. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). How the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis (Vol. 161). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Towards a Computational Comparative Neuroprimatology: Framing the language-ready brain. Physics of Life Reviews, 161, 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogin, Barry, Bragg, Jared, & Kuzawa, Christopher. (2014). Humans are not cooperative breeders but practice biocultural reproduction. Annals of human biology, 41(4), 368–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brauer, Jens, Anwander, Alfred, Perani, Daniela, & Friederici, Angela D. (2013). Dorsal and ventral pathways in language development. Brain and language, 127(2), 289–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Morten H., & Chater, Nick. (2016). Creating language: integrating evolution, acquisition, and processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
d’Errico, F., & Stringer, C. B. (2011). Evolution, revolution or saltation scenario for the emergence of modern cultures? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 1060. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dippel, Gabriel, & Beste, Christian. (2015). A causal role of the right inferior frontal cortex in implementing strategies for multi-component behaviour. Nature communications, 61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, Karen, McCullough, Stephen, Mehta, Sonya, Ponto, Laura L. B., & Grabowski, Thomas J. (2011). Sign language and pantomime production differentially engage frontal and parietal cortices. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(7), 878–901. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fagg, Andrew H., & Arbib, Michael A. (1998). Modeling parietal-premotor interactions in primate control of grasping. Neural Networks, 11(7–8), 1277–1303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W., & Martins, Mauricio D. (2014). Hierarchical processing in music, language, and action: Lashley revisited. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1316(1), 87–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, Dorothy M., Biro, D., Eshchar, Y., Humle, T., Izar, P., Resende, B., & Visalberghi, E. (2013). The fourth dimension of tool use: temporally enduring artefacts aid primates learning to use tools. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1630). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, Ram, Armstrong, Blair C., Siegelman, Noam, & Christiansen, Morten H. (2015). Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 117–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter, & Högberg, Anders. (2017). The archaeology of teaching and the evolution of Homo docens . Current Anthropology, 58(2), 000–000. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gobet, Fernand, Lane, Peter C. R., Croker, Steve, Cheng, Peter C. H., Jones, Gary, Oliver, Iain, & Pine, Julian M. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 5(6), 236–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. (2003). Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(5), 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Robles, Aida, Hopkins, William D., Schapiro, Steven J., & Sherwood, Chet C. (2015). Relaxed genetic control of cortical organization in human brains compared with chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(48), 14799–14804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gowlett, John A. J. (1984). Mental abilities of early man: A look at some hard evidence. In R. Foley (Ed.), Hominid Evolution and Community Ecology (pp. 167–192). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Patricia M. (1991). Language, tools, and brain: The development and evolution of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 141, 531–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hecht, Erin E., Gutman, D. A., Khreisheh, N., Taylor, S. V., Kilner, J., Faisal, A. A., … Stout, D. (2014). Acquisition of Paleolithic toolmaking abilities involves structural remodeling to inferior frontoparietal regions. Brain Structure and Function, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hecht, Erin E., Gutman, David A., Preuss, Todd M., Sanchez, Mar M., Parr, Lisa A., & Rilling, James K. (2013). Process Versus Product in Social Learning: Comparative Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Neural Systems for Action Execution–Observation Matching in Macaques, Chimpanzees, and Humans. Cerebral Cortex, 23(5), 1014–1024. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hecht, Erin E., Gutman, David A., Bradley, Bruce A., Preuss, Todd M., & Stout, Dietrich. (2015). Virtual dissection and comparative connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in chimpanzees and humans. NeuroImage, 1081, 124–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heyes, Cecilia M., & Frith, Chris D. (2014). The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science, 344(6190), 1243091. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Kim, Barton, M., & Hurtado, A. M. (2009). The emergence of human uniqueness: Characters underlying behavioral modernity. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 18(5), 187–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingold, Tim. (1997). Eight themes in the anthropology of technology. Social Analysis, 411, 106–138.Google Scholar
Isler, Karin, & Van Schaik, Carel P. (2014). How humans evolved large brains: Comparative evidence. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 23(2), 65–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Hillard, Hill, Kim, Lancaster, Jane, & Hurtado, A. Magdalena. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 9(4), 156–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koechlin, Etienne, & Jubault, Thomas. (2006). Broca’s Area and the hierarchical organization of human behavior. Neuron, 50(6), 963–974. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Oren, Edelman, Shimon, & Lotem, Arnon. (2015). Evolution of protolinguistic abilities as a by-product of learning to forage in structured environments. Proc. R. Soc. B, 282(1811), 20150353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laland, Kevin N., Uller, Tobias, Feldman, Marcus W., Sterelny, Kim, Müller, Gerd B., Moczek, Armin, … Odling-Smee, John. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282(1813). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambon Ralph, Matthew A., Jefferies, Elizabeth, Patterson, Karalyn, & Rogers, Timothy T. (2016). The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., & Holler, Judith. (2014). The origin of human multi-modal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jason E., & Harmand, Sonia. (2016). An earlier origin for stone tool making: implications for cognitive evolution and the transition to Homo. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 371(1698), 20150233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milner, A. David, & Goodale, Melvyn A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Kimberly J., Isenberg, Nancy, & Haxby, James V. (2007). Communicative hand gestures and object-directed hand movements activated the mirror neuron system. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(2), 114–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Mark W. (2010). “Grammars of action” and stone flaking design space. In A. Nowell & I. Davidson (Eds.), Stone tools and the evolution of human cognition (pp. 13–43). Boulder, Colorado: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. J. H., Uomini, N. T., Rendell, L. E., Chouinard-Thuly, L., Street, S. E., Lewis, H. M., … Laland, K. N. (2015). Experimental evidence for the co-evolution of hominin tool-making teaching and language. 6, 6029. DOI logo [URL]
Nonaka, Tetsushi, Bril, Blandine, & Rein, Robert. (2010). How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology. Journal of Human Evolution, 59(2), 155–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orban, Guy A., & Caruana, Fausto. (2014). The neural basis of human tool use. Frontiers in psychology, 5(310), 12.Google Scholar
Putt, Shelby S., Wijeakumar, Sobanawartiny, Franciscus, Robert G., & Spencer, John P. (2017). The functional brain networks that underlie Early Stone Age tool manufacture. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(6), 0102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rilling, James K., Glasser, Matthew F., Jbabdi, Saad, Andersson, Jesper, & Preuss, Todd M. (2011). Continuity, Divergence, and the Evolution of Brain Language Pathways. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 3, 11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roepstorff, Andreas, Niewöhner, Jörg, & Beck, Stefan. (2010). Enculturing brains through patterned practices. Neural Networks, 23(8), 1051–1059. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruff, Christopher B., Trinkaus, Erik, & Holliday, Trenton W. (1997). Body mass and encephalization in Pleistocene Homo. Nature, 387(6629), 173–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schell, Marianne, Zaccarella, Emiliano, & Friederici, Angela D. (2017). Differential cortical contribution of syntax and semantics: An fMRI study on two-word phrasal processing. Cortex, 961, 105–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J. R., & Stringer, C. B. (2012). Human Evolution Out of Africa: The Role of Refugia and Climate Change. Science, 335(6074), 1317–1321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stout, Dietrich. (2002). Skill and cognition in stone tool production: An ethnographic case study from Irian Jaya. Current Anthropology, 45(3), 693–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Stone toolmaking and the evolution of human culture and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 1050–1059. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Neuroscience of technology. In P. J. Richerson & M. Christiansen (Eds.), Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion (pp. 157–173). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stout, Dietrich, Apel, Jan, Commander, Julia, & Roberts, Mark. (2014). Late Acheulean technology and cognition at Boxgrove, UK. Journal of Archaeological Science, 411, 576–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stout, Dietrich, & Chaminade, Thierry. (2007). The evolutionary neuroscience of tool making. Neuropsychologia, 451, 1091–1100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1585), 75–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stout, Dietrich, & Hecht, Erin E. (2017). Evolutionary neuroscience of cumulative culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 7861–7868. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stout, Dietrich, Hecht, Erin, Khreisheh, Nada, Bradley, Bruce, & Chaminade, Thierry. (2015). Cognitive Demands of Lower Paleolithic Toolmaking. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0121804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stout, Dietrich, & Khreisheh, Nada. (2015). Skill Learning and Human Brain Evolution: An Experimental Approach. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 25(04), 867–875. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stout, Dietrich, Passingham, Richard, Frith, Christopher, Apel, Jan, & Chaminade, Thierry. (2011). Technology, expertise and social cognition in human evolution. European Journal of Neuroscience, 33(7), 1328–1338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stout, Dietrich, Toth, N., Schick, K., & Chaminade, T. (2008). Neural correlates of Early Stone Age toolmaking: technology, language and cognition in human evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 363(1499), 1939–1949. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strike, Lachlan T., Hansell, Narelle K., Couvy-Duchesne, Baptiste, Thompson, Paul M., de Zubicaray, Greig I., McMahon, Katie L., & Wright, Margaret J. (2018). Genetic Complexity of Cortical Structure: Differences in Genetic and Environmental Factors Influencing Cortical Surface Area and Thickness. Cerebral Cortex. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toth, Nicholas, Schick, Kathy D., & Semaw, Sileshi. (2006). A comparative study of the stone tool-making skills of Pan, Australopithecus, and Homo sapiens . In N. Toth & K. D. Schick (Eds.), The Oldowan: case studies into the earliest stone age (pp. 155–222). Gosport, IN: Stone Age Institute Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Stephen M., Saygin, Ayşe Pinar, Sereno, Martin I., & Iacoboni, Marco. (2004). Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature neuroscience, 7(7), 701–702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, D., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 3581, 593–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Yaqiong, Friederici, Angela D., Margulies, Daniel S., & Brauer, Jens. (2016). Development of a selective left-hemispheric fronto-temporal network for processing syntactic complexity in language comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 831, 274–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Arbib, Michael
2024. Chapter 1. Pantomime within and beyond the evolution of language. In Perspectives on Pantomime [Advances in Interaction Studies, 12], ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Barrett, Louise & Dietrich Stout
2024. Minds in movement: embodied cognition in the age of artificial intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 379:1911 DOI logo
Arbib, Michael A., Dorothy M. Fragaszy, Susan D. Healy & Dietrich Stout
2023. Tooling and Construction: From Nut-Cracking and Stone-Tool Making to Bird Nests and Language. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences 5 ► pp. 100121 ff. DOI logo
Edelman, Shimon
2023. Speech and Sign. In The Consciousness Revolutions, ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Pain, Ross
2023. Stone tools, predictive processing and the evolution of language. Mind & Language 38:3 ► pp. 711 ff. DOI logo
Schubotz, Ricarda I., Sonja J. Ebel, Birgit Elsner, Peter H. Weiss & Florentin Wörgötter
2023. Tool mastering today – an interdisciplinary perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Pargeter, Justin, Cheng Liu, Megan Beney Kilgore, Aditi Majoe & Dietrich Stout
2022. Testing the Effect of Learning Conditions and Individual Motor/Cognitive Differences on Knapping Skill Acquisition. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory DOI logo
Gärdenfors, Peter
2021. Demonstration and pantomime in the evolution of teaching and communication. Language & Communication 80 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Gärdenfors, Peter
2022. Teaching as evolutionary precursor to language. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Stout, Dietrich
2021. The cognitive science of technology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25:11 ► pp. 964 ff. DOI logo
Stout, Dietrich
2023. Experimental neuroarchaeology of visuospatial behavior. In Cognitive Archaeology, Body Cognition, and the Evolution of Visuospatial Perception, ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Arbib, Michael A., Francisco Aboitiz, Judith M. Burkart, Michael C. Corballis, Gino Coudé, Erin Hecht, Katja Liebal, Masako Myowa-Yamakoshi, James Pustejovsky, Shelby S. Putt, Federico Rossano, Anne E. Russon, P. Thomas Schoenemann, Uwe Seifert, Katerina Semendeferi, Chris Sinha, Dietrich Stout, Virginia Volterra, Sławomir Wacewicz & Benjamin Wilson
2020. The comparative neuroprimatology 2018 (CNP-2018) road map for research on How the Brain Got Language. In How the Brain Got Language – Towards a New Road Map [Benjamins Current Topics, 112], ► pp. 370 ff. DOI logo
Wilkins, Jayne
2020. Learner-driven innovation in the stone tool technology of earlyHomo sapiens. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2 DOI logo
Arbib, Michael A., Francisco Aboitiz, Judith M. Burkart, Michael Corballis, Gino Coudé, Erin Hecht, Katja Liebal, Masako Myowa-Yamakoshi, James Pustejovsky, Shelby Putt, Federico Rossano, Anne E. Russon, P. Thomas Schoenemann, Uwe Seifert, Katerina Semendeferi, Chris Sinha, Dietrich Stout, Virginia Volterra, Sławomir Wacewicz & Benjamin Wilson
2018. The comparative neuroprimatology 2018 (CNP-2018) road map for research on How the Brain Got Language . Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 19:1-2 ► pp. 370 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.