Cover not available
Review published In:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 18:2 (2017) ► pp.299–302
Book review

Jaszczolt, 2016. Meaning in Linguistic Interaction: Semantics, Metasemantics, Philosophy of Language

Reviewed by
| Shanghai Jiao Tong University |
Article outline
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 8 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18.2.08zen
References (10)
References
Borg, E.. (2004). Minimal semantics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Pursuing meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brône, G., & Zima, E.. (2014). Towards a dialogic construction grammar: Ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 457–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, H., & Lepore, E.. (2005). Insensitive semantics: A defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, K. M.. (2010). Default semantics. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (pp. 193–221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2016). Meaning in linguistic interaction: Semantics, metasemantics, philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F.. (2002). Unarticulated constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 251, 299–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (2010). Truth-conditional pragmatics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar