Article published in:
How the Brain Got Language: Towards a New Road Map
Edited by Michael A. Arbib
[Interaction Studies 19:1/2] 2018
► pp. 370–387

The comparative neuroprimatology 2018 (CNP-2018) road map for research on How the Brain Got Language

| University of California at San Diego
| Universidad Católica de Chile
| Universität Zürich
| University of Auckland
| Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod – CNRS
| Georgia State University
| Freie Universität Berlin
| Kyoto University
| Brandeis University
| Indiana University
| University of California at San Diego
| Glendon College of York University
| Indiana University
| Hunan University
| University of California at San Diego
| Hunan University
| Emory University
| Italian National Research Council, CNR
| Nicolaus Copernicus University
| Newcastle University
We present a new road map for research on “How the Brain Got Language” that adopts an EvoDevoSocio perspective and highlights comparative neuroprimatology – the comparative study of brain, behavior and communication in extant monkeys and great apes – as providing a key grounding for hypotheses on the last common ancestor of humans and monkeys (LCA-m) and chimpanzees (LCA-c) and the processes which guided the evolution LCA-m → LCA-c → protohumans → H. sapiens. Such research constrains and is constrained by analysis of the subsequent, primarily cultural, evolution of H. sapiens which yielded cultures involving the rich use of language.
Keywords: brain evolution, cultural evolution, EvoDevoSocio, language-ready brain, language evolution, neurolinguistics, neuroprimatology, primate communication, protolanguage, social interaction
Published online: 17 September 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18013.arb
References

References

Aboitiz, F.
(2018) Voice, gesture and working memory in the emergence of speech. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 70–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arbib, M. A.
(2012) How the Brain Got Language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018a) Computational Challenges of evolving the language-ready brain: 1. From Manual Action to Protosign. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 7–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018b) Computational Challenges of evolving the language-ready brain: 2. Building towards neurolinguistics. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 22–37.[ p. 386 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burkart, J. M., Guerreiro Martins, E. M., Miss, F., & Zürcher, Y.
(2018) From sharing food to sharing information. Cooperative breeding and language evolution. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 136–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. W., & Russon, A. E.
(1998) Learning by imitation: a hierarchical approach. Behav Brain Sci, 21(5), 667–684; discussion 684–721.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. W., & Whiten, A.
(1988) Machiavellian Intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans (1 ed.). Oxford: Claredon Press.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C.
(2018) Mental travels and the cognitive basis of language. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 353–370.Google Scholar
Coudé, G., & Ferrari, P. F.
(2018) Reflections on the differential organization of mirror neuron systems for hand and mouth and their role in the evolution of communication in primates. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 38–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., Braga, L. W., Ventura, P., Filho, G. N., Jobert, A., … Cohen, L.
(2010) How Learning to Read Changes the Cortical Networks for Vision and Language. Science, 330(6009), 1359–1364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dubreuil, B., & Henshilwood, C. S.
(2013) Archeology and the language-ready brain. Language and Cognition, 5(2–3), 251–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, E. E.
(2018) Plasticity, innateness, and the path to language in the primate brain: Comparing macaque, chimpanzee and human circuitry for visuomotor integration. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 54–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaas, J.
(Ed.) (2017) Evolution of Nervous Systems (Second Edition; in 4 volumes): Elsevier.Google Scholar
Liebal, K., & Oña, L.
(2018) Mind the gap – moving beyond the dichotomy between intentional gestures and emotional facial and vocal signals of nonhuman primates. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 121–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myowa, M.
(2018) The Evolutionary Roots of Human Imitation, Action Understanding and Symbols. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 183–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petkov, C. I., & Jarvis, E. D.
(2012) Birds, primates, and spoken language origins: behavioral phenotypes and neurobiological substrates. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 4, 12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, J.
(2018) From Actions to Events: Communicating through Language and Gesture. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 289–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Putt, S., & Wijeakumar, S.
(2018) Tracing the evolutionary trajectory of verbal working memory with neuro-archaeology. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 272–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rilling, J. K.
(2014) Comparative primate neurobiology and the evolution of brain language systems. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 28, 10–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossano, F.
(2018) Social manipulation, turn-taking and cooperation in apes: Implications for the evolution of language-based interaction in humans. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 151–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russon, A.
(2018) Pantomime and imitation in great apes: Implications for reconstructing the evolution of language. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 200–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoenemann, P. T.
(2018) The evolution of enhanced conceptual complexity and of Broca’s area: Language preadaptations. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 336–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seifert, U.
(2018) Relating the evolution of Music-Readiness and Language-Readiness within the context of comparative neuroprimatology. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 86–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semendeferi, K.
(2018) Why do we want to talk? Evolution of neural substrates of emotion and social cognition. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 102–120.[ p. 387 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, C.
(2018) Praxis, symbol and language: developmental, ecological and linguistic issues. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 239–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stout, D.
(2018) Archaeology and the evolutionary neuroscience of language: the technological pedagogy hypothesis. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 256–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Volterra, V., Capirci, O., Rinaldi, P., & Sparaci, L.
(2018) From action to spoken and signed language through gesture: some basic developmental issues for a discussion on the evolution of the human language-ready brain. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 216-238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wacewicz, S., & Żywiczyński, P.
(2018) Language origins: The platform of trust, cooperation, and turn-taking. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 167–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B., & Petkov, C. I.
(2018) From evolutionarily conserved frontal regions for sequence processing to human innovations for syntax. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 318–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Arbib, Michael A.
2018. Biology Matters. Physics of Life Reviews 26-27 ► pp. 176 ff. Crossref logo
Arbib, Michael A.
2018. From cybernetics to brain theory, and more: A memoir. Cognitive Systems Research 50 ► pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Fröhlich, Marlen, Christine Sievers, Simon W. Townsend, Thibaud Gruber & Carel P. Schaik
2019. Multimodal communication and language origins: integrating gestures and vocalizations. Biological Reviews 94:5 ► pp. 1809 ff. Crossref logo
Humphries, Tom, Poorna Kushalnagar, Gaurav Mathur, Donna Jo Napoli, Christian Rathmann & Scott Smith
2019. Support for parents of deaf children: Common questions and informed, evidence-based answers. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 118 ► pp. 134 ff. Crossref logo
Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Sławomir Wacewicz & Casey Lister
2021. Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.