Cover not available
Article published In:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 20:2 (2019) ► pp.275–306

Physiological changes during first encounters and their role in determining the perceived interaction quality

| Universiteit Antwerpen, Department of Communication Science
| Universiteit Antwerpen, Faculty of Applied Economics
| Universiteit Antwerpen, Department of Communication Science
| Algemeen Medisch Laboratorium, Antwerpen
What determines if the first interaction between strangers will be a pleasant experience? We conducted an experiment to investigate the extent to which the perceived quality of an interaction is influenced by conversation content and context, and we document the physiological changes that are likely to play a role in establishing rapport. Females who did not know each other met in pairs and conducted a gossip- or creativity task, either face-to-face or online. The conversation content had no effect on the quality of online interactions. However in the face-to-face condition gossip was associated with better interaction quality. Tonic electrodermal activity steadily declined throughout the interaction, while phasic electrodermal activity first peaked and then returned to baseline. Neither were related to perceived interaction quality. Heart rate variability (HRV) dropped at first but then remained stable. A smaller drop in HRV drop corresponded to higher ratings of rapport and liking. Together these results suggest that gossip can improve the quality of a face-to-face interaction between strangers, and support the conjecture that parasympathetic activity is a marker of human openness to social engagement.
Keywords: social interaction, autonomic nervous system, heart rate variability, skin conductance, oxytocin, gossip, mediated communication
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The influence of context and content on social interaction quality
    • 1.2Peripheral physiology and interaction quality
      • 1.2.1Parasympathetic activity and interaction quality
      • 1.2.2Sympathetic activity and interaction quality
      • 1.2.3Peripheral oxytocin and interaction quality
    • 1.3Peripheral physiology mediates the relation between the properties of an interaction and the reported quality of that interaction
  • 2.Materials and methods
    • 2.1Design
    • 2.2Participants
    • 2.3Procedure
    • 2.4Measuring interaction quality
    • 2.5Physiological measurements
    • 2.6Variables
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1The effect of context and content on interaction quality (Hypotheses 1 & 2)
    • 3.2Changes in physiology as a result of the social interaction
    • 3.3Correlations between physiological variables and interaction quality (Hypotheses 3–5)
    • 3.4Mediation analysis (Hypothesis 6)
  • 4.Discussion
  • References
Published online: 7 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18015.rud
References (97)
References
Acharya, U. R., Joseph, K. P., Kannathal, N., Lim, C. M., & Suri, J. S. (2006). Heart rate variability: a review. Medical and biological engineering and computing, 44(12), 1031–1051. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., Le, B., & Goodfriend, W. (2004). Thinking close: Measuring relational closeness as perceived self-other inclusion. In D. J. Mashek, A. Aron, Handbook of closeness and intimacy, 103–115. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Amico, J. A., Ervin, M. G., Leake, R. D., Fisher, D. A., Finn, F. M., & Robinson, A. G. (1985). A novel oxytocin-like and vasotocin-like peptide in human plasma after administration of estrogen. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 60(1), 5–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andreassi, J. L. (2013). Psychophysiology: Human behavior & physiological response. Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(4), 596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 87(1), 156–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bee, P. E., Bower, P., Lovell, K., Gilbody, S., Richards, D., Gask, L., & Roach, P. (2008). Psychotherapy mediated by remote communication technologies: a meta-analytic review. BMC psychiatry, 8(1), 60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedek, M., & Kaernbach, C. (2010a). A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. Journal of neuroscience methods, 190(1), 80–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b). Decomposition of skin conductance data by means of nonnegative deconvolution. Psychophysiology, 47(4), 647–658.Google Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., Davis, J. M., Rosenthal, R., & Knee, C. R. (1994). Interactional synchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(3), 303–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernieri, F. J. (2005). The expression of rapport. In V. Manusov (Ed.) The sourcebook of nonverbal measures. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C., and Lev-On, A. (2007). Computer-mediated communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: an experimental analysis. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 6(2), 139–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boero, R., Bravo, G., Castellani, M., and Squazzoni, F. (2009). Reputational cues in repeated trust games. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 871–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., and Wright, Z. (2002). Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 135–140). ACM.Google Scholar
Boucsein, W. (2012). Electrodermal activity. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brondino, N., Fusar-Poli, L., & Politi, P. (2017). Something to talk about: Gossip increases oxytocin levels in a near real-life situation. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 771, 218–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buton, F., Fontayne, P., Heuzé, J. P., Bosselut, G., & Raimbault, N. (2007). The QAG-A: an analog version of the questionnaire sur l’ambiance du groupe for measuring the dynamic nature of group cohesion. Small Group Research, 38(2), 235–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camm, A. J., Malik, M., Bigger, J. T., Breithardt, G., Cerutti, S., Cohen, R. J., … & Lombardi, F. (1996). Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation, 93(5), 1043–1065. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, C. S. (2007). Sex differences in oxytocin and vasopressin: implications for autism spectrum disorders? Behavioural brain research, 176(1), 170–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaminade, T. (2017). An experimental approach to study the physiology of natural social interactions. Interaction Studies, 18(2), 254–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. S., & Winkielman, P. (2012). Modulating social behavior with oxytocin: how does it work? What does it mean?. Horm. Behav. 61(3), 392–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conty, L., Russo, M., Loehr, V., Hugueville, L., Barbu, S., Huguet, P., … & George, N. (2010). The mere perception of eye contact increases arousal during a word-spelling task. Social neuroscience, 5(2), 171–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cordonier, L., Breton, A., Trouche, E., & Van der Henst, J. B. (2017). Does prestige affect us physiologically?. A study in interactional context. Interaction Studies, 18(2), 214–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Critchley, H. D. (2002). Electrodermal responses: what happens in the brain. The Neuroscientist, 8(2), 132–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Critchley, H. D., & Harrison, N. A. 2013. Visceral influences on brain and behavior. Neuron 77(4), 624–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. N., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 103–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darlington, R. B., & Hayes, A. F. (2017). Regression analysis and linear models: Concepts, application, and implementation.Google Scholar
Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2007). The electrodermal system. In I. T. Cacioppo & L. G. Tassinary (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology (pp. 159–181). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Backer, C. J., Nelissen, M., Vyncke, P., Braeckman, J., and McAndrew, F. T. (2007). Celebrities: From teachers to friends. Human Nature, 18(4), 334–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Backer, C., and Fisher, M. L. (2012). Tabloids as windows into our interpersonal relationships: A content analysis of mass media gossip from an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(3), 404–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diamond, L. M., & Cribbet, M. R. (2012). Links between adolescent sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system functioning and interpersonal behavior over time. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 88(3), 339–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diamond, L. M., Hicks, A. M., & Otter-Henderson, K. D. (2011). Individual differences in vagal regulation moderate associations between daily affect and daily couple interactions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 371, 731–744. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dieleman, G. C., Huizink, A. C., Tulen, J. H., Utens, E. M., Creemers, H. E., van der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2015). Alterations in HPA-axis and autonomic nervous system functioning in childhood anxiety disorders point to a chronic stress hypothesis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 511, 135–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dieleman, G. C., van der Ende, J., Verhulst, F. C., & Huizink, A. C. (2010). Perceived and physiological arousal during a stress task: can they differentiate between anxiety and depression?. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(8), 1223–1234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duarte, J., Siegel, S., and Young, L. (2012). Trust and credit: the role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(8), 2455–2484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of general psychology, 8(2), 100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(6), 581–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, B. E., Greaves-Lord, K., Euser, A. S., Tulen, J. H., Franken, I. H., & Huizink, A. C. (2013). Determinants of physiological and perceived physiological stress reactivity in children and adolescents. PloS one, 8(4), e61724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., & Schneider, F. (2009). Eyes are on us, but nobody cares: are eye cues relevant for strong reciprocity? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1686), 1315–1323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Stellar, J., and Keltner, D. (2012). The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1015–1030. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R., Gordon, I., & Zagoory-Sharon, O. (2010). The cross-generation transmission of oxytocin in humans. Horm. Behav. 58(4), 669–676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geisler, F. C., Vennewald, N., Kubiak, T., & Weber, H. (2010). The impact of heart rate variability on subjective well-being is mediated by emotion regulation. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 49(7), 723–728. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillis, J. S., & Bernieri, F. (2001). The perception and judgment of rapport. In K. R. Hammond, T. R. Steward (Eds.) The Essential Brunswik (pp. 380–384). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gorin, V., and Dubied, A. (2011). Desirable people: Identifying social values through celebrity news. Media, culture and society, 33(4), 599–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewen, K. M., & Light, K. C. (2011). Plasma oxytocin is related to lower cardiovascular and sympathetic reactivity to stress. Biol. Psychol. 87(3), 340–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewen, K. M., Girdler, S. S., Amico, J., & Light, K. C. (2005). Effects of partner support on resting oxytocin, cortisol, norepinephrine, and blood pressure before and after warm partner contact. Psychosom. Med. 67(4), 531–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1993). Emotional suppression: physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(6), 970. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hastings, P. D., Nuselovici, J. N., Utendale, W. T., Coutya, J., McShane, K. E., & Sullivan, C. (2008). Applying the polyvagal theory to children’s emotion regulation: Social context, socialization, and adjustment. Biological psychology, 79(3), 299–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvat-Gordon, M., Granger, D. A., Schwartz, E. B., Nelson, V. J., & Kivlighan, K. T. (2005). Oxytocin is not a valid biomarker when measured in saliva by immunoassay. Physiology & behavior, 84(3), 445–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability 1(1), 221–233.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R., & Fernald, R. D. (2004). How the brain processes social information: searching for the social brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci, 271, 697–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itier, R. J., & Batty, M. (2009). Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: the core of social cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(6), 843–863. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kagerbauer, S. M., Martin, J., Schuster, T., Blobner, M., Kochs, E. F., & Landgraf, R. (2013). Plasma oxytocin and vasopressin do not predict neuropeptide concentrations in human cerebrospinal fluid. J. Neuroendocrinol. 25(7), 668–673. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karkow, F. J., Spiandorello, W. P., Godoy, R. F., Pezzi, P., Karkow, A. G., & Faintuch, J. (2004). Subjective versus objective stress in noncritically ill hospitalized and outpatient adult men. Revista do Hospital das Clínicas, 59(4), 161–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemp, A. H., Quintana, D. S., Kuhnert, R. L., Griffiths, K., Hickie, I. B., & Guastella, A. J. (2012). Oxytocin increases heart rate variability in humans at rest: implications for social approach-related motivation and capacity for social engagement. PLoS One, 7(8), e44014. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kéri, S., & Kiss, I. (2011). Oxytocin response in a trust game and habituation of arousal. Physiol. Behav. 102(2), 221–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: a research review. Psychological bulletin, 100(1), 78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kok, B. E., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2010). Upward spirals of the heart: Autonomic flexibility, as indexed by vagal tone, reciprocally and prospectively predicts positive emotions and social connectedness. Biological psychology, 85(3), 432–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, B., Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., & Parizel, P. M. (2017). A functional MRI study on how oxytocin affects decision making in social dilemmas: Cooperate as long as it pays off, aggress only when you think you can win. Horm. Behav., 941, 145–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lange, C. G., & James, W. (1922). The emotions (Vol. 1). Williams & Wilkins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, J., & Arluke, A. (1985). An exploratory analysis of sex differences in gossip. Sex roles, 121(3–4), 281–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. D., Lamm, C., Segalowitz, S. J., Stieben, J., & Zelazo, P. D. (2006). Neurophysiological correlates of emotion regulation in children and adolescents. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 18(3), 430–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lopatina, O., Inzhutova, A., Salmina, A. B., & Higashida, H. 2013. The roles of oxytocin and CD38 in social or parental behaviors. Front. Neurosci, 61, 182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, K., & Feifel, D. (2014). Oxytocin׳ s role in anxiety: A critical appraisal. Brain Res. 1580, 22–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J. R. (1995). "Telephone Phobia.” In J. R. Marshall, S. Lipsett. Social Phobia: From Shyness to Stage Fright. New York: BasicBooks.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D., Bryson, J. J., Rauwolf, P., & Ingram, G. P. (2016). On the reliability of unreliable information. Gossip as Cultural Memory. Interaction Studies, 17(1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolić, M., Vente, W., Colonnesi, C., & Bögels, S. M. (2016). Autonomic arousal in children of parents with and without social anxiety disorder: a high-risk study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(9), 1047–1055. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Hari, R., & Hietanen, J. K. (2014). Bodily maps of emotions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(2), 646–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oldehinkel, A. J., Ormel, J., Bosch, N. M., Bouma, E., Van Roon, A. M., Rosmalen, J. G., & Riese, H. (2011). Stressed out? Associations between perceived and physiological stress responses in adolescents: The TRAILS study. Psychophysiology, 48(4), 441–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrovický, P., Němcová, V., Hans, J., Overeem, S., Vos, P. (2011). The reticular formation and some related nuclei. In J. Hans (Ed.) Clinical neuroanatomy (pp. 211–247). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piazza, J., and Bering, J. M. (2008). Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(3), 172–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Porges, S. W. (2001). The polyvagal theory: phylogenetic substrates of a social nervous system. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 42(2), 123–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2003). The polyvagal theory: Phylogenetic contributions to social behavior. Physiol. Behav. 79(3), 503–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. The polyvagal perspective. Biol. Psychol. 74(2), 116–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quintana, D. S., Guastella, A. J., Outhred, T., Hickie, I. B., & Kemp, A. H. (2012). Heart rate variability is associated with emotion recognition: Direct evidence for a relationship between the autonomic nervous system and social cognition. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 86(2), 168–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quintana, D. S., Kemp, A. H., Alvares, G. A., & Guastella, A. J. (2013). A role for autonomic cardiac control in the effects of oxytocin on social behavior and psychiatric illness. Front. Neurosci. 71, 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ragot, M., Martin, N., Em, S., Pallamin, N., & Diverrez, J. M. (2017). Emotion recognition using physiological signals: laboratory vs. wearable sensors. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 15–22). Springer.Google Scholar
Ross, H. E., & Young, L. J. (2009). Oxytocin and the neural mechanisms regulating social cognition and affiliative behavior. Frontiers in neuroendocrinology, 30(4), 534–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubin, L. H., Carter, C. S., Bishop, J. R., Pournajafi-Nazarloo, H., Drogos, L. L., Hill, S. K., … & Pearlson, G. D. (2014). Reduced levels of vasopressin and reduced behavioral modulation of oxytocin in psychotic disorders. Schizophrenia bulletin, 40(6), 1374–1384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudnicki, K., De Backer, C. J., & Declerck, C. (2019). The effects of celebrity gossip on trust are moderated by prosociality of the gossipers. Personality and Individual Differences, 1431, 42–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schultheiss, O. C., & Stanton, S. J. (2009). Assessment of salivary hormones. Methods in social neuroscience, 171–44.Google Scholar
Shahrestani, S., Stewart, E. M., Quintana, D. S., Hickie, I. B., & Guastella, A. J. (2015). Heart rate variability during adolescent and adult social interactions: A meta-analysis. Biological psychology, 1051, 43–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., & Abu-Akel, A. (2016). The social salience hypothesis of oxytocin. Biol. Psychiat. 79(3), 194–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H. J., and Milinski, M. (2008). Multiple gossip statements and their effect on reputation and trustworthiness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 275(1650), 2529–2536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H. J., Semmann, D., and Milinski, M. (2007). Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 104(44), 17435–17440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strathearn, L., Fonagy, P., Amico, J., & Montague, P. R. (2009). Adult attachment predicts maternal brain and oxytocin response to infant cues. Neuropsychopharmacol. 34(13), 2655–2666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tarvainen, M. P., Niskanen, J. P., Lipponen, J. A., Ranta-Aho, P. O., & Karjalainen, P. A. (2014). Kubios HRV–heart rate variability analysis software. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 113(1), 210–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tarvainen, M. P., Ranta-Aho, P. O., & Karjalainen, P. A. (2002). An advanced detrending method with application to HRV analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 49(2), 172–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thayer, J. F., & Lane, R. D. (2000). A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation. Journal of affective disorders, 61(3), 201–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological inquiry, 1(4), 285–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 585–600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waddington, K., & Fletcher, C. (2005). Gossip and emotion in nursing and health-care organizations. Journal of health organization and management, 19(4/5), 378–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. M. (1996). Coordinated cycles in behavior and physiology during face-to-face social interactions. In J. H. Watt & C. A. VanLear (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in communication processes (pp. 327–352). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 501, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, T., Luo, Y., Broster, L. S., Gu, R., & Luo, Y. J. (2013). The impact of anxiety on social decision-making: Behavioral and electrodermal findings. Social neuroscience, 8(1), 11–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rudnicki, Konrad, Irina Spacova, Charlotte De Backer, Caroline E. M. K. Dricot, Sarah Lebeer & Karolien Poels
2023. Neuroendocrine and psychophysiological investigation of the evolutionary roots of gossip. Scientific Reports 13:1 DOI logo
Poels, Karolien, Konrad Rudnicki & Heidi Vandebosch
2022. The Media Psychology of Boredom and Mobile Media Use. Journal of Media Psychology 34:2 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.