Article published in:
Social Cues in Robot Interaction, Trust and Acceptance
Edited by Alessandra Rossi, Kheng Lee Koay, Silvia Moros, Patrick Holthaus and Marcus Scheunemann
[Interaction Studies 20:3] 2019
► pp. 455486


Allen, M., Poggiali, D., Whitaker, K., Marshall, T. R., & Kievit, R.
(2018, August). Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. PeerJ Preprints, 6, e27137v1. Retrieved from CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B.
(1983) The logic and limits of trust.Google Scholar
[ p. 483 ]
Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S.
(2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International journal of social robotics, 1 (1), 71–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartneck, C., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Nomura, T.
(2007) The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with aibo on their attitude towards robots. Ai & Society, 21 (1–2), 217–230.Google Scholar
Baxter, P., Kennedy, J. E. S., Lemaignan, S., & Belpaeme, T.
(2016) From characterising three years of hri to methodology and reporting recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2016 acm/ieee human-robot interaction conference (alt.hri). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickmore, T., Pfeifer, L., Schulman, D., Perera, S., Senanayake, C., & Nazmi, I.
(2008) Public displays of affect: Deploying relational agents in public spaces. In Proceedings of chi’08 (pp. 3297–3302). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breazeal, C., Kidd, C., Thomaz, A., Hoffman, G., & Berlin, M.
(2005) Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork. In Proceedings of the ieee international conference on intelligent robots and systems (pp. 708–713). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corritore, C., Kracher, B., & Wiedenbeck, S.
(2003) Online trust: Concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 737–758. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walters, M., Koay, K., & Werry, I.
(2005) What is a robot companion – friend, assistant or butler. In Proceedings of the ieee international conference on intelligent systems and robots (pp. 1192–1197). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Desai, M., Medvedev, M., Vázquez, M., McSheehy, S., Gadea-Omelchenko Bruggeman, S., … Yanco, H.
(2012) Effects of changing reliability on trust of robot systems. In Proceedings of the acm/ieee conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 73–80). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., & Powers, A.
(2003) Matching robot appearance and behaviour to tasks to improve human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of ieee roman international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (pp. 55–60).Google Scholar
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B.
(2003) A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, K., & Wegner, D.
(2012) Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 125(1), 125–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guznov, S., Lyons, J., Nelson, A., & Woolley, M.
(2016) The effects of automation error types on operators’ trust and reliance. In S. Lackey & R. Shumaker (Eds.), Virtual, augmented and mixed reality (pp. 116–124). Cham: Springer International Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamacher, A., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Pipe, A. G., & Eder, K.
(2016) Believing in BERT: Using expressive communication to enhance trust and counteract operational error in physical human-robot interaction. In Robot and human interactive communication (ro-man), 2016 25th ieee international symposium on (pp. 493–500). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, P., Billings, D., Schaefer, K., Chen, J., de Visser, E., & Parasuraman, R.
(2011) A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 484 ]
Iwamura, Y., Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N.
(2011) Do elderly people prefer a conversational humanoid as a shopping assistant partner in supermarkets. In Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 449–456). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A.
(2004) Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human factors, 46(1), 50–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. J., Knox, W. B., Wormwood, J. B., Breazeal, C., & Desteno, D.
(2013) Computationally modelling interpersonal trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(893). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M., Kiesler, S., & Forlizzi, J.
(2010) Receptionist or information kiosk: how do people talk with a robot? In Proceedings of the 2010 acm conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 31–40). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemaignan, S., Fink, J., & Dillenbourg, P.
(2014) The dynamics of anthropomorphism in robotics. In in proceedings of the international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 226–227). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, G., Boberg, J., Traum, D., Artstein, R., Gratch, J., Gainer, A., … Leuski, A.
(2018) Getting to know each other: The role of social dialogue in recovery from errors in social robots. In Proceedings of the 2018 acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 344–351). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D.
(1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709–734. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mirnig, N., Stollnberger, G., Miksch, M., Stadler, S., Giuliani, M., & Tscheligi, M.
(2017) To err is robot: How humans assess and act toward an erroneous social robot. In Frontiers in robotics and ai. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moray, N., & Inagaki, T.
(1999) Laboratory studies of trust between humans and machines in automated systems. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 21 (4–5), 203–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mori, M.
(1970) The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33–35.Google Scholar
Muir, B., & Moray, N.
(1996) Trust in automation: Part II. “experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.”. In Ergonomics (pp. 429–460). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muir, B. M.
(1994) Trust in automation: Part i. theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37(11), 1905–1922. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nass, C., & Lee, K.
(2000) Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? an experimental test of similarity-attraction. In Proceedings of chi’00 (p. 329–336). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nomura, T., & Kanda, T.
(2003, Nov). On proposing the concept of robot anxiety and considering measurement of it. In The 12th ieee international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, 2003. proceedings. roman 2003. (p. 373–378). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pages, J., Marchionni, L., & Ferro, F.
(2016) Tiago: the modular robot that adapts to different research needs. In International workshop on robot modularity, iros.Google Scholar
Parasuraman, R., & Miller, C.
(2004) Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Communication of the ACM, 47(4), 51–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 485 ]
Ray, C., Mondada, F., & Siegwart, R.
(2008) What do people expect from robots? In Proceedings of the ieee/rsj 2008 international conference on intelligent robots and systems (pp. 3816–3821). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinette, P., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R.
(2017) Effect of robot performance on human-robot trust in time-critical situations. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 47(4), 425–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinette, P., Li, W., Allen, R., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R.
(2016) Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios. In The eleventh acm/ieee international conference on human robot interaction (pp. 101–108). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salem, M., Eyssel, F., Rohlfing, K., Kopp, S., & Joulbin, F.
(2013) To err is human(-like): Effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likeability. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5, 313–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salem, M., Lakatos, G., Amirabdollahian, F., & Dautenhahn, K.
(2015) Would you trust a (faulty) robot?: Effects of error, task type and personality on human-robot cooperation and trust. In Proceedings of the tenth annual acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 141–148). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, S., Araiza-Illan, D., & Eder, K.
(2017) Effects of faults, experience, and personality on trust in a robot co-worker. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.02335.Google Scholar
Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N.
(2006) Interactive humanoid robots for a science museum. In Proceedings of the 1st acm sigchi/sigart conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 305–312). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sidner, C., Lee, C., & Lesh, N.
(2003) Engagement rules for human-robot collaborative interactions. In Proceedings of the ieee international conference on systems man and cybernetics (pp. 3957–3962). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thrun, S., Schulte, J., & Rosenburg, C.
(2000) Interaction with mobile robots in public places. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 7–11.Google Scholar
Wiegmann, D. A., Rich, A., & Zhang, H.
(2001) Automated diagnostic aids: The effects of aid reliability on users’ trust and reliance. In Theoretical issues in ergonomic science (p. 352–367). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J., Straus, S., & McEvily, B.
(2006) All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 16–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wortham, Robert H., and Andreas Theodorou
(2017) “Robot transparency, trust and utility.” Connection Science 29.3 (2017): 242–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 486 ]
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Kontogiorgos, Dimosthenis, Sanne van Waveren, Olle Wallberg, Andre Pereira, Iolanda Leite & Joakim Gustafson
2020.  In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kopp, Tobias, Marco Baumgartner & Steffen Kinkel
2021. Success factors for introducing industrial human-robot interaction in practice: an empirically driven framework. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 112:3-4  pp. 685 ff. Crossref logo
Stiber, Maia & Chien-Ming Huang
2020.  In Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction,  pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Vattheuer, Christopher, Annalena Nora Baecker, Denise Y. Geiskkovitch, Stela Hanbyeol Seo, Daniel J. Rea & James E. Young
2020.  In Social Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12483],  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
Wijnen, Luc, Séverin Lemaignan & Paul Bremner
2020.  In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction,  pp. 514 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.