Article published in:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 21:2 (2020) ► pp. 268292
References

References

Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S.
(2019) Human-robot interaction: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beach, W. A.
(1993) Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “Okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 325–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Youssef, A., Clavel, C., Essid, S., Bilac, M., Chamoux, M., & Lim, A.
(2017) UE- HRI: a new dataset for the study of user engagement in spontaneous human- robot interactions. Paper presented at the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, Glasgow, UK.
Breazeal, C.
(2003) Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 167–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Button, G.
(1991) Conversation-in-a-series. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure. Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis (pp. 251–277). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Campano, S., Clavel, C., & Pélachaud, C.
(2015) “I like this painting too”: when an ECA shares appreciations to engage users. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’15), Istanbul, Turkey.
Cassell, J., Torres, O., & Prevost, S.
(1999) Turn taking vs. discourse structure: How best to model multimodal conversation. In Y. Wilks (Ed.), Machine Conversations (pp. 143–154). The Hague: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, D.
(1992) Computer rules, conversational rules. Computational Linguistics, 18(4), 531–536.Google Scholar
Clavel, C., Vasilescu, I., & Devillers, L.
(2011) Fiction support for realistic portrayals of fear-type emotional manifestations. Computer Speech & Language, 25(1), 63–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clavel, C., Cafaro, A., Campano, S., & Pelachaud, C.
(2016) Fostering User Engagement in Face-to-Face Human-Agent Interactions: A Survey. In A. Esposito & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Toward Robotic Socially Believable Behaving Systems – Volume II: Modeling Social Signals (pp. 93–120). Cham: Springer International Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clavel, C., & Callejas, Z.
(2016) Sentiment analysis: from opinion mining to human-agent interaction. IEEE Transactions on affective computing, 7(1), 74–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, R., & Cornelius, R. R.
(2003) Describing the emotional states that are expressed in speech. Speech communication, 40(1–2), 5–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dautenhahn, K.
(2007) Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 362(1480), 679–704. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, P., Robins, B., & Dautenhahn, K.
(2013) Where the action is: A conversation analytic perspective on interaction between a humanoid robot, a co-present adult and a child with an ASD. Interaction Studies, 14(2), 297–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A.
(1997) Linguistic anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C.
(1992) Rethinking context: an introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking Context, language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 1–42). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K.
(2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 143–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C., & Thompson, S.
(1996) Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (134-184): Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H.
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1973) La mise en scène de la vie quotidienne (Vol. 2. Les relations en public). Paris: Les Editions de minuit.Google Scholar
(1983) The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48(1), pp: 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1981) Conversational organization: interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1991) L’Ethnométhodologie : une approche procédurale de l’action et de la communication. Réseaux CNET, 50, 89–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219–248). New York: New York Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. A.
(2017) What makes a robot “social”? Social Studies of Science, 47(4), 556–579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langlet, C., & Clavel, C.
(2014) Modelling user’s attitudinal reactions to the agent utterances: focus on the verbal content. Paper presented at the 5th International Workshop on Corpora for Research on Emotion, Sentiment & Social Signals (ES3 2014), Reykjavik, Iceland.
(2018) Detecting User’s Likes and Dislikes for a Virtual Negotiating Agent. Paper presented at the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, Boulder, USA. Crossref
Levinson, S. C.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, C., & Figeac, J.
(2014) L’Organisation temporelle des engagements visuels dans des situations de multi-activité équipée en milieu urbain. Activités, 11(1).Google Scholar
Licoppe, C., & Rollet, N.
(2020, in press) « Je dois y aller ». Analyses de séquences de clôtures entre humains et robot. Réseaux. La Découverte.Google Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2006) Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8(1), pp. 117–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Documenter l’articulation des ressources multimodales dans le temps : la transcription d’enregistrements vidéos d’interactions. In M. Bilger (Ed.), Données orales. Les enjeux de la transcription (Vol. 37), pp. 127–156. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan.Google Scholar
Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A., & Talwalkar, A.
(2012) Foundations of machine learning. MIT press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1979) Transcription as a theory. In B. B. Schieffelin (Ed.), Developmental Pragmatics (pp. 42–72). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pelachaud, C., & Glas, N.
(2015a) Definitions of Engagement in Human-Agent Interaction. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Engagement in Human Computer Interaction (ENHANCE), Xi’an, China.
(2015b) Topic transition strategies for an information-giving agent. Paper presented at the 15th European Workshop on natural Language Generation, Brighton, UK.
Pelikan, H. R. M., & Broth, M.
(2016) Why That Nao?: How Humans Adapt to a Conventional Humanoid Robot in Taking Turns-at-Talk. Paper presented at the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA. Crossref
Pitsch, K., Kuzuoka, H., Suzuki, Y., Süssenbach, L., Luff, P., & Heath, C.
(2009) “The first five seconds”: Contingent stepwise entry into an interaction as a means to secure sustained engagement in Human-Robot-Interaction. Paper presented at the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication ROMAN 2009, Toyama, Japan.
Porcheron, M., Fischer, J. E., Reeves, S., & Sharples, S.
(2018) Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life. Montreal QC, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rollet, N.
(2010) All the things you are. Activité multimodale, frontières et musiques improvisées en répétition In N. Andrieux-Reix (Ed.), Frontières. Du linguistique au sémiotique (pp. 279–302). Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar
(2013) “D’accord”. Approche conversationnelle et multimodale d’une forme située dans les appels au Samu-Centre 15. L’Information grammaticale, 139.Google Scholar
Rollet, N., Jain, V., Licoppe, C., & Devillers, L.
(2017) Towards Interactional Symbiosis: Epistemic Balance and Co-presence in a Quantified Self Experiment. In L. Gamberini, A. Spagnolli, G. Jacucci, B. Blankertz, & J. Freeman (Eds.), Symbiotic Interaction: 5th International Workshop, Symbiotic 2016, Padua, Italy, September 29–30, 2016, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 143–154). Cham: Springer International Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1984) On doing ‘being ordinary’. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 413–429). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(1992) Lectures on conversation (Jefferson, G. ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E.
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–326.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A symplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–731. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sadazuka, K., Kuno, Y., Kawashima, M., & Yamazaki, K.
(2007) Museum Guide Robot with Effective Head Gestures. Paper presented at the International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, Seoul, Korea. Crossref
Schegloff, E.
(1987) Between micro and macro: contexts and other connections. In B. Giesen, J. C. Alexander, R. Münch, & N. J. Smelser (Eds.), The Micro-macro link (pp. 207–234). Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Accounts of conduct in interaction. Interruption, overlap, and turn-taking. In T. J. H. (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 287–321). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum publishers.Google Scholar
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. (Vol. 1): Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sidner, C. L., & Dzikovska, M.
(2002 16–16 Oct. 2002) Human-robot interaction: engagement between humans and robots for hosting activities. Paper presented at the 4th IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, Pittsburgh, USA.
Sidner, C. L., Lee, C., Kidd, C. D., & Rich, C.
(2005) Explorations in engagement for humans and robots. Artificial Intelligence, 166, 140–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T.
(2008) Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 44(1), 31–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Coding Social Interaction: A Heretical Approach in Conversation Analysis? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(1), 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Šabanović, S., & Chang, W.-L.
(2016) Socializing robots: constructing robotic sociality in the design and use of the assistive robot PARO. AI and Society, 31(4), 537–551. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Straub, I.
(2016) “It looks like a human!” The interrelation of social presence, interaction and agency ascription: a case study about the effects of an android robot on social agency ascription. AI and Society, 31(4), 553–571. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, L.
(2007) Human-Machine Reconfigurations. Plans and situated actions, 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yu, Z., Scherer, S., Devault, D., Gratch, J., Stratou, G., Morency, L., & Cassell, J.
(2013) Multimodal Prediction of Psychological Disorder: Learning Verbal and Nonverbal Commonality in Adjacency Pairs. Paper presented at the 17th Workshop Series on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Amsterdam, Netherland.
Zimmerman, D.
(2006) How closing matters in emergency telephone calls. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Sociology Association, Montréal, Canada.
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kopp, Stefan & Nicole Krämer
2021. Revisiting Human-Agent Communication: The Importance of Joint Co-construction and Understanding Mental States. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.