Cover not available
Article In:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 25:2 (2024) ► pp.218–244
Research report

Designing socially assistive robots

Qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ expectations and desires

ORCID logo | Griffith University
ORCID logo | Griffith University
ORCID logo | Griffith University
Objectives
This study aimed to understand stakeholders’ views on design choices associated with socially assistive robots for people with dementia.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 informal carers, one formal carer, one care centre manager, and one person with dementia. Individual semi-structured interviews lasted 45 minutes and were conducted online via the Microsoft Teams app or telephone. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed.
Results
The thematic analysis included four main themes: physical design characteristics, functional features and abilities, data management and operational practicalities. Animal-like robots for companionship were likely to be accepted by people with dementia. Telepresence and service robots integrated into smart networks were viewed as communication and safety tools. Integrating multiple robots and smart devices could provide the level of functionality required to care for people with dementia.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Methods
    • Ethical considerations
    • Design of interview questions
    • Interview questions
    • Recruitment and method of interview participation
    • Data analysis
  • Findings
    • Participants
    • First impressions and previous knowledge of SARs
  • Theme 1. Physical design characteristics
    • Appearances and materials
    • Size, mass and mobility
  • Theme 2. Functional features and abilities
    • Reactionary movements of robotic parts
    • Music
    • Robot-specific audio outputs
    • Verbal dialogue
  • Theme 3. Data management
    • Conversations on surveillance
    • Organization of daily activities and administration duties
  • Theme 4. Operational practicalities
    • Cost
    • Training
    • Introducing a social robot to a person with dementia
  • Discussion
  • Limitations and strengths
  • Future directions
  • Conclusion
  • Ethics
  • Notes
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (42)
References
Abdi, J., Al-Hindawi, A., Ng, T., & Vizcaychipi, M. P. (2018). Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ open, 8 (2), e018815. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banovic, S., Zunic, L. J., & Sinanovic, O. (2018). Communication Difficulties as a Result of Dementia. Mater Sociomed, 30 (3), 221–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blindheim, K., Solberg, M., Hameed, I. A., & Alnes, R. E. (2023). Promoting activity in long-term care facilities with the social robot Pepper: a pilot study. Inform Health Soc Care, 48 (2), 181–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradwell, H. L., Edwards, K., Shenton, D., Winnington, R., Thill, S., & Jones, R. B. (2021). User-Centered Design of Companion Robot Pets Involving Care Home Resident-Robot Interactions and Focus Groups With Residents, Staff, and Family: Qualitative Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol, 8 (4), e30337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradwell, H. L., Edwards, K. J., Winnington, R., Thill, S., & Jones, R. B. (2019). Companion robots for older people: importance of user-centred design demonstrated through observations and focus groups comparing preferences of older people and roboticists in South West England. BMJ open, 9 (9), e032468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, A., Trivedi, D. P., Dickinson, A., Hamilton, L., Goodman, C., Gage, H., Ashaye, K., Iliffe, S., & Manthorpe, J. (2019). Managing behavioural and psychological symptoms in community dwelling older people with dementia: 2. A systematic review of qualitative studies. Dementia (London), 18 (7–8), 2950–2970. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Budak, K. B., Atefi, G., Hoel, V., Laporte Uribe, F., Meiland, F., Teupen, S., Felding, S. A., & Roes, M. (2023). Can technology impact loneliness in dementia? A scoping review on the role of assistive technologies in delivering psychosocial interventions in long-term care. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 18 (7), 1107–1119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiberska, D. (2018). The use of robotic animals in dementia care: challenges and ethical dilemmas. Mental Health Practice, 21 (10), 23–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feng, Y., Perugia, G., Yu, S. H., Barakova, E. I., Hu, J., & Rauterberg, G. W. M. (2022). Context-Enhanced Human-Robot Interaction: Exploring the Role of System Interactivity and Multimodal Stimuli on the Engagement of People with Dementia [Article]. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14 (3), 807–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M., Dao, D., & Moyle, W. (2023). Design Attributes of Socially Assistive Robots for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Social Robotics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Health, A. I. O., & Welfare. (2023). Dementia in Australia. [URL]
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2 (4), 361–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2001). Use of constant comparative analysis in qualitative research. Nurs Stand, 15 (42), 39–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, C. J., Li, P. S., Wang, C. H., Lin, S. L., Hsu, T. C., & Tsai, C. T. (2023). Socially Assistive Robots for People Living with Dementia in Long-Term Facilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Gerontology, 69 (8), 1027–1042. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeon, Y. H., Shin, M., Smith, A., Beattie, E., Brodaty, H., Frost, D., Hobbs, A., Kotting, P., Petrie, G., Rossor, M., Thompson, J., Vickers, J., & Waters, D. (2021). Early Implementation and Evaluation of StepUp for Dementia Research: An Australia-Wide Dementia Research Participation and Public Engagement Platform. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18 (21). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joranson, N., Olsen, C., Calogiuri, G., Ihlebaek, C., & Pedersen, I. (2021). Effects on sleep from group activity with a robotic seal for nursing home residents with dementia: a cluster randomized controlled trial [Article]. Int Psychogeriatr, 33 (10), 1045–1056. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joranson, N., Pedersen, I., Rokstad, A. M., & Ihlebaek, C. (2016). Change in quality of life in older people with dementia participating in Paro-activity: a cluster-randomized controlled trial [Article]. J Adv Nurs, 72 (12), 3020–3033. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ke, C., Lou, V. W., Tan, K. C., Wai, M. Y., & Chan, L. L. (2020). Changes in technology acceptance among older people with dementia: the role of social robot engagement [Article]. Int J Med Inform, 141 1, 104241, Article 104241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koh, W. Q., Felding, S. A., Budak, K. B., Toomey, E., & Casey, D. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of social robots for older adults and people with dementia: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr, 21 (1), 351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kudo, M. (2021). SoftBank stops making Pepper robot but says it isn’t dead. Nikkei Asia. Retrieved 24/05/2024 fromGoogle Scholar
Long, S., Benoist, C., Weidner, W. (2023). World Alzheimer Report 2023: Reducing dementia risk: never too early, never too late. [URL]
Lumivero. (2022). Nvivo Version 13 1. In [URL]
Malik, M. F., Shahid, H., Saleem, M. H., Nazir, H., Nouman, A., International Conference on, R., & Automation in Industry Peshawar, P. M. M. (2023). Housekeeping Using Multi-Agent Service Robotics. In 2023 International Conference on Robotics and Automation in Industry (ICRAI) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Martin, E., Escalona, F., & Cazorla, M. (2020). Socially Assistive Robots for Older Adults and People with Autism: An Overview. Electronics, 9 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milton, A., & Rodgers, P. (2013). Research Methods for Product Design. Laurence King Publishing.Google Scholar
Moharana, S., Panduro, A. E., Lee, H. R., Riek, L. D., & th Acm/Ieee International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, M. M. (2019). Robots for Joy, Robots for Sorrow: Community Based Robot Design for Dementia Caregivers. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 458–467). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyle, W., Bramble, M., Jones, C., & Murfield, J. (2018). Care staff perceptions of a social robot called Paro and a look-alike Plush Toy: a descriptive qualitative approach. Aging Ment Health, 22 (3), 330–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyle, W., Jones, C., Dwan, T., Ownsworth, T., & Sung, B. (2019). Using telepresence for social connection: views of older people with dementia, families, and health professionals from a mixed methods pilot study. Aging Ment Health, 23 (12), 1643–1650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyle, W., Jones, C., Pu, L., & Chen, S. C. (2018). Applying user-centred research design and evidence to develop and guide the use of technologies, including robots, in aged care. Contemp Nurse, 54 (1), 1–3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyle, W., Jones, C., & Sung, B. (2020). Telepresence robots: Encouraging interactive communication between family carers and people with dementia. Australas J Ageing, 39 (1), e127–e133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyle, W., Jones, C. J., Murfield, J. E., Thalib, L., Beattie, E. R. A., Shum, D. K. H., O’Dwyer, S. T., Mervin, M. C., & Draper, B. M. (2017). Use of a Robotic Seal as a Therapeutic Tool to Improve Dementia Symptoms: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial [Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 18 (9), 766–773. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rathore, M. M., Shah, S. A., Shukla, D., Bentafat, E., & Bakiras, S. (2021). The Role of AI, Machine Learning, and Big Data in Digital Twinning: A Systematic Literature Review, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Access, 9 1, 32030–32052. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, H., MacDonald, B. A., Kerse, N., & Broadbent, E. (2013). Suitability of healthcare robots for a dementia unit and suggested improvements. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 14 (1), 34–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruangritchankul, S., Peel, N. M., Hanjani, L. S., & Gray, L. C. (2020). Drug related problems in older adults living with dementia. PLoS ONE, 15 (7), e0236830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schöbel, S., Schmitt, A., Benner, D., Saqr, M., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2023). Charting the Evolution and Future of Conversational Agents: A Research Agenda Along Five Waves and New Frontiers. Information Systems Frontiers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senanarong, V., Cummings, J. L., Fairbanks, L., Mega, M., Masterman, D. M., O’Connor, S. M., & Strickland, T. L. (2004). Agitation in Alzheimer’s disease is a manifestation of frontal lobe dysfunction. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 17 (1–2), 14–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siniscarco, M. T., Love-Williams, C., & Burnett-Wolle, S. (2017). Video Conferencing: An Intervention for Emotional Loneliness in Long-Term Care. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 41 (4), 316–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A Practical Iterative Framework for Qualitative Data Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8 (1), 76–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sumioka, H., Yamato, N., Shiomi, M., & Ishiguro, H. (2021). A Minimal Design of a Human Infant Presence: A Case Study Toward Interactive Doll Therapy for Older Adults With Dementia [Article]. Frontiers in Robotics and Ai, 8 1, 633378, Article 633378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tasmania, U. O. (2022). Retrieved 07/07/2023 from [URL]
Thordardottir, B., Malmgren Fange, A., Lethin, C., Rodriguez Gatta, D., & Chiatti, C. (2019). Acceptance and Use of Innovative Assistive Technologies among People with Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int, 2019 1, 9196729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar