How to do things with logical expressions
Creating collective value through co-ordinated reasoning
We argue that logical expressions in human language enable speakers to perform particular acts as well as stating propositions which may be true or false. We present a conversational action planning model of co-ordinated reasoning, which we use to predict choice of logical expressions in situations in which two people co-operate in the face of risk and uncertainty. We first show how this model predicts preferences for formulations of conditional directives where a principal instructs an agent on how to behave in a hypothetical situation. Second, we show how this model accounts for choices of quantity and probability expressions that express risk, in situations where a professional advises a client on her options. We conclude that the pragmatic signals encoded in human logical vocabulary can facilitate the co-ordination of social interaction through aiding mutual recognition of intentions on joint projects where collaboration is likely to create value.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Demeure, Virginie
2010.
Facework and Utilitarian Relevance in the Disambiguation of Statements With Two Indirect Interpretations.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29:4
► pp. 443 ff.
Hilton, Denis
2008.
Emotional tone and argumentation in risk communication.
Judgment and Decision Making 3:1
► pp. 100 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.