But how did protolanguage actually start?

Derek Bickerton | University of Hawaii

In dealing with the nature of protolanguage, an important formative factor in its development, and one that would surely have influenced that nature, has too often been neglected: the precise circumstances under which protolanguage arose. Three factors are involved in this neglect: a failure to appreciate radical differences between the functions of language and animal communication, a failure to relate developments to the overall course of human evolution, and the supposition that protolanguage represents a package, rather than a series of separate developments that sequentially impacted the communication of pre-humans. An approach that takes these factors into account is very briefly suggested.

Keywords: language, protolanguage, human evolution, functional reference, animal communication, compositionality, paleoanthropology, holophrasis

Published online: 07 March 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.9.1.12bic

Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Arbib, Michael A., Katja Liebal & Simone Pika

2008. Primate Vocalization, Gesture, and the Evolution of Human Language. Current Anthropology 49:6 ► pp. 1053 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.