Article published in:
Human and Robot Interactive CommunicationEdited by Kerstin Dautenhahn
[Interaction Studies 9:2] 2008
► pp. 179–203
The carrot and the stick
The role of praise and punishment in human–robot interaction
Christoph Bartneck | Eindhoven University of Technology
Juliane Reichenbach | Technische Universität Berlin
Julie Carpenter | University of Washington
This paper presents two studies that investigate how people praise and punish robots in a collaborative game scenario. In a first study, subjects played a game together with humans, computers, and anthropomorphic and zoomorphic robots. The different partners and the game itself were presented on a computer screen. Results showed that praise and punishment were used the same way for computer and human partners. Yet robots, which are essentially computers with a different embodiment, were treated differently. Very machine-like robots were treated just like the computer and the human; robots very high on anthropomorphism / zoomorphism were praised more and punished less. However, barely any of the participants believed that they actually played together with a robot. After this first study, we refined the method and also tested if the presence of a real robot, in comparison to a screen representation, would influence the measurements. The robot, in the form of an AIBO, would either be present in the room or only be represented on the participants’ computer screen (presence). Furthermore, the robot would either make 20% errors or 40% errors (error rate) in the collaborative game. We automatically measured the praising and punishing behavior of the participants towards the robot and also asked the participant to estimate their own behavior. Results show that even the presence of the robot in the room did not convince all participants that they played together with the robot. To gain full insight into this human–robot relationship it might be necessary to directly interact with the robot. The participants unconsciously praised AIBO more than the human partner, but punished it just as much. Robots that adapt to the users’ behavior should therefore pay extra attention to the users’ praises, compared to their punishments.
Keywords: presence, human, interaction, robot, punishment, praise
Published online: 26 May 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.9.2.03bar
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.9.2.03bar
Cited by
Cited by 16 other publications
Allan, D. D., Andrew J. Vonasch & Christoph Bartneck
Bankins, Sarah & Paul Formosa
Baron, Naomi S.
de Graaf, Maartje M.A., Somaya Ben Allouch & Tineke Klamer
Keijsers, Merel & Christoph Bartneck
Keijsers, Merel, Christoph Bartneck & Friederike Eyssel
Keijsers, Merel, Hussain Kazmi, Friederike Eyssel & Christoph Bartneck
Lee, Yi-Ching, Ali Momen & Jennifer LaFreniere
Lombard, Matthew & Kun Xu
Papadopoulos, Fotios, Kerstin Dautenhahn & Wan Ching Ho
Rossmy, Beat, Sarah Theres Völkel, Elias Naphausen, Patricia Kimm, Alexander Wiethoff & Andreas Muxel
Saunderson, Shane & Goldie Nejat
Xu, Kun
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.