Vol. 168:2 (2017) ► pp. 143–163
Applying theories of justice to high-stakes language tests
Justice has been the topic of comparatively few papers in the fields of applied linguistics or language assessment. This may be due to the lack of a clear and agreed-upon definition on the one hand, or to the difficulty of operationalizing justice for test development on the other. This paper aims to remedy both problems by discussing prior conceptualizations of justice and by introducing six justice principles, which are based on theories of distributive justice that focus on human rights, fairness, equal opportunity, and dignity. The overarching aim of this paper is to advance the debate on justice, and to provide a consistent way of considering ethical and moral dilemmas that language testers face today.
- 2.Approaches to justice
- 2.1Taking position
- 2.2 Rawls, Rawls, Rawls
- 2.3Justice in language testing
- 3.Six principles of just testing
- 3.1Even a coercive testing policy should be just
- 3.2 A just testing policy treats test takers with dignity
- 3.3A just testing policy relies on empirical evidence
- 3.4All primary stakeholders should be consulted
- 3.5Agency implies accountability
- 3.6Test takers have a right to privacy
Cited by 6 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.