Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 119/120 (1998) ► pp.123153
References
ALLWOOD, J.
(1981) : On the distinctions between semantics and pragmatics. In W. Klein and W. Levelt (eds.), Crossing the boundaries in linguistics, 177–189. Dordrecht, etc. : D. Reidel Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
AUSTIN, J.L.
(1962) : How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
BLUM-KULKA, S., HOUSE, J. and KASPER, G.
eds. Cross-cultural Pragmatics : Requests and Apologies Norwood, N.J. Ablex
BOXER, D. and PICKERING, L.
(1995) : Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials : The case of complaints. ELT Journal, 49(1), 44–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BROWN, P. and LEVINSON, S.C.
(1978) : Universals in language use : politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness Strategies in Social Interaction, 256–289. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987) : Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BROUWER, D., GERRITSEN, M. and DEHAAN, D.
(1979) : Speech differences between women and men : On the wrong track? Language in Society, 8(1), 33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CARTER, R.
(1990) : The new grammar teaching. In R. Carter (ed.), Knowledge About Language. London : Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
CHICK, J.K.
(1985) : The interactional accomplishment of discrimination in South Africa. Language in Society, 14(3), 299–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986) : Intercultural miscommunication as a source of friction in the workplace and in educational settings. In G. Kendall (ed.), Education and the Diversity of Cultures, 25–36). Pietermaritzburg : University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
(1989) : Interactional as a source of friction in the workplace and in educational settings. In O. Garcia and R. Otheguy (eds.), English Across Cultures : Cultures Across English, 139–160). Berlin & New York : Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) : Sources and consequences of miscommunication in Afrikaans English-SA English encounters. In J. Cheshire (ed.), English Around the World, 446–461). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995a) : Interactional sociolinguistics and intercultural communication in South Africa. In R. Mesthrie (ed.), Language and Social History. 230–241. Cape Town & Johannesburg : David Philip.Google Scholar
(1995b) : Intercultural communication. In S.L. McKay and N.H. Hornberger (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching, 329–348. Cambridge, etc. : Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) : Further thoughts on the adequacy of communicative competence as the goal of language teaching in a multilingual, multicultural society. Journal for Language Teaching, 30(4), 322–332.Google Scholar
CLARK, H.H.
(1979) : Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 111, 430–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
COHEN, A.D. and OLSHTAIN, E.
(1981) : Developing a measure of socio-cultural competence : The case of apology. Language Learning, 31(1), 113–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
COULTHARD, M.
(1992) : Forensic discourse analysis. In M. Coulthard (ed.), Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, 242–257. London : Routledge.Google Scholar
DE KADT, E.
(1992a) : Politeness phenomena in South African black English. In L.F. Bouton and Y. Kachru (eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning, 103–116. Urbana-Champaign, Ill. : University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
(1992b) : Requests as speech acts in Zulu. South African Journal of African Languages, 12(3), 101–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
FAERCH, C. and KASPER, G.
(1989) : Internal and external modifications in interlanguage request realization. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-cultural Pragmatics : Requests and Apologies, 221–247. Norwood, N.J. : Ablex.Google Scholar
GOUGH, D.H.
(1994) : Some problems for politeness theory : Deference and directness in Xhosa performative requests. South African Journal of African Languages, 15(3), 123–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GRICE, H. P.
(1975) : Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3 : Speech Acts, 41–58. New York : Academic Press.Google Scholar
HATCH, E.
(1992) : Discourse and language education. Cambridge, etc. : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
HJELMQUIST, E.
(1984) : Memory for conversations. Discourse Processes, 71, 321–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HODGE, F. K.
(1990) : Cross-cultural study of request realization patterns across two groups of native speakers of English. South African Journal of Linguistics, 8(3), 121–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HYMES, D.H.
(1968) : The ethnography of speaking. In J. Fishman (ed.),In J. Fishman (ed.), Readings in the Sociology of Language, 99–138. The Hague : Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HYMES, D.
(1971) : On Communicative Competence. Philadelphia, CA : University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
KASANGA, L.A.
Forthcoming) : Pragmatic competence. A longitudinal observation. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics.
KASPER, G.
(1981) : Pragmatische Aspekte in der Interimsprache. Tübingen, Germany : Narr.Google Scholar
LEECH, G.N.
(1983) : Principles of Pragmatics. London & New York : Longman.Google Scholar
LEVINSON, S.C.
(1983) : Pragmatics. Cambridge, etc. : Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LOCK, G.
(1996) : Functional English Grammar. Cambridge, etc. : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Low, G.D.
(1992) : Can grammar be humanized? And can cognitive linguistics do it? In J. Kohn and D. Wolff (eds.), New Tendencies in Curriculum Development, 113–128. Szombathely, Hungary : Szombathely Teacher Training College Publishing House.Google Scholar
MORRIS, C.
(1938) Foundations of the theory of signs. In C. Morris (1971), Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague : Mouton.Google Scholar
RlNTELL, E.M. and MITCHELL, C.J.
(1989) : Studying requests and apologies : An inquiry into method. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-cultural Pragmatics : Requests and Apologies, 248–272. Norwood, N.J. : Ablex.Google Scholar
SEARLE, J.R.
(1969) : Speech Acts : An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1976) : A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1979) : Expression or Meaning. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
THOMAS, J.A.
(1983) : Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) : Meaning in interaction. An introduction to pragmatics. London & New York : Longman.Google Scholar
(1996a) : Pragmatics and language teaching. IATEFL Annual Conference Report 1996, 28–30. Whistable, Kent : The International association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language.Google Scholar
(1996a) : Update on Pragmatics. Whistable, Kent : The International association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language.Google Scholar
WIDDOWSON, H.
(1984) : Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
WOLFSON, N., MARMOR, T. and JONES, S.
(1989) : Problems in the comparison of speech acts across cultures. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-cultural Pragmatics : Requests and Apologies, 174–196. Norwood, N.J. : Ablex.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Filipek, Raquel & Samuel G. Lawrence
2005. Planning Requests for Help as a Function of Anticipated Resistance and Language Proficiency. Atlantic Journal of Communication 13:3  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Kasanga, Luanga A.
2006. Requests in a South African variety of English. World Englishes 25:1  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.