Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 137/138 (2002) ► pp.181–204

En los límites de la (des)cortesía

formas atenuadas de la agresividad verbal en el debate político español

| Universitat Jaume I

Article language: French

Published online: 1 January 2002
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.137-138.02bla
References (30)
Referencias
AGHA, A. (1997): "Tropic Aggression in the Clinton-Dole Presidential Debate", Pragmatics 7, 4:461–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BAÑÓN, A. (1997): La interrupción conversacional Propuestas para su análisis pragmalingüístico, Anejo XII de Analecta Malacitana, Universidad de Málaga.Google Scholar
BLAS ARROYO, J.L. (1998a): " 'Tero no me interrumpa usted, haga el favor...'. Las interrupciones en el debate político-electoral", Mediterranean Language Review 101:54–88.Google Scholar
(1998b): "Funciones y estructuras discursivas del moderador en el debate político", Langues et Linguistique 241:35–57.Google Scholar
(2000): "Mire usted Sr. González Personal deixis in Spanish political - electoral debate", Journal of Pragmatics 32, 1:1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001): "'No digas chorradas: la descortesía en el debate político cara a cara. Una aproximación pragma-variacionista", Oralia 41:9–46.Google Scholar
BRIZ, A. (1995): "La atenuación en la conversación coloquial. Una categoría pragmática", en Cortés, L. (ed.): El español coloquial Actas del I Simposio sobre Análisis del discurso oral, Universidad de Almería, 101–122.Google Scholar
BROWN, P. & LEVINSON, S.C. (1978): "Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena", en E.N. Goody (ed.), 56–311. Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987): Politeness. Some Universals in Language Use, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BUTLER, C. (1988): "Pragmatics and Systemic Linguistics", Journal of Pragmatics 12, 1:83–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
COCHO, F. & VILLAMOR, L. (1993): Cara a Cara. Las elecciones generales de 1993, La Coruña, La Voz de Galicia.Google Scholar
CULPEPER, J. (1996): "Towards an anatomy of impoliteness", Journal of Pragmatics 251:349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
FERNÁNDEZ, F. (2000): Estrategas del diálogo. La interacción comunicativa en el discurso político-electoral, Granada, Método Ediciones.Google Scholar
ESCANDELL, V. (1993): Introducción a la pragmática, Barcelona, Ariel.Google Scholar
FRASER, B. (1990): "Perspectivas on Politeness", Journal of Pragmatics 141:219–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
FRASER, B. & W. NOLAN, (1981): "The association of deference with linguistic form", International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 271:93–107.Google Scholar
GARCÍA ESCUDERO, J.M. (1996): El insulto en la campaña electoral de 1996, Logroño, El autor.Google Scholar
GRICE, P. (1975): "Logic and conversation", En P. Cole & J. Morgan, (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
GHIGLIONE, R. (1989): Je vous ai compris ou L'anayse des discours politiques, Paris, Armand Colin.Google Scholar
HARRIS, L., K. GERGEN & J. LANNAMAN (1986): "Aggression rituals", Communication Monographs 531:252–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HAVERKATE, H. (1994): La cortesía verbal, Madrid, Gredos.Google Scholar
HELD, G. (1992): "Politeness in linguistic research" En Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, 131–154.Google Scholar
HOUSE, J. & KASPER, G. (1981): "Politenes markers in English and German" En Conversational Routine. Explorations in Standadized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, The Hague Mouton, 157–86.Google Scholar
KERBRAT-ORECCHÍONI, C (1992): Les interactions verbales II, Paris, Armand Colin.Google Scholar
LAKOFF, R (1973): "The Logic of Politeness: or. minding your p's and q'a", En Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, 292–305.Google Scholar
LAKOFF, G. & JOHNSON, M. (1995): Metáforas de la vida cotidiana, Madrid, Cátedra.Google Scholar
LEECH, G.N. (1983): Principles of Pragmatics, London-New York, Longman.Google Scholar
MEIER, A. J. (1995): "Passages of politeness", Journal of Pragmatics 241:381–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
TROGNON, A. & LARRUE, J. (1994), "Les débate politiques télévisés", En A. Trognon & J. Larrue, (eds.), Pragmatique du discours politique, Paris, Armand Colin, 55–126.Google Scholar
WATTS, R. (1992): "Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality", En R. Watts, S. Ide & K. Ehlich, (eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, 43–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Tordera Yllescas, Juan Carlos & María José García Folgado
2023. La interrupción desde el eje diacrónico: análisis de dos debates legislativos sobre educación (el Decreto de Romanones de 1902 y la Ley Celaá de 2020). Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 139:1 ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Blas-Arroyo, José Luis
2003. `Perdóneme que se lo diga, pero vuelve usted a faltar a la verdad, señor González': Form and Function of Politic Verbal Behaviour in Face-to-Face Spanish Political Debates. Discourse & Society 14:4 ► pp. 395 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.