Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 143/144 (2004) ► pp. 6188
References

References

BACHMAN, L.F.
(1990) Fundamental consideration in Language Testing, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BARRATT, E. S.
(1959) Anxiety and impulsiveness related to Psychomotor efficiency. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 9, 191–198.Google Scholar
BARRATT, E. S. & PATTON, J. H.
(1983) Impulsivity: cognitive, behavioral and psychophysiological correlates. In Zuckerman, M.(ed.), Biological bases of sensation seeking, impulsivity and anxiety (pp. 77–122). New York: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
BARRATT, E. S. Pattone, J., Olsson, N. G. & Zuker, G.
(1981) Impulsivity and paced tapping. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 286–300.Google Scholar
DORON, S.
(1973) Reflectivity-Impulsivity and Their influence on Reading for Inference for Adult Students of ESL. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
EHRMAN, M. and R. Oxford
(1990) Adult Language Learning Styles and Strategies in an Intensive Training Setting. Modern Language Journal, 74,3, 311–27.Google Scholar
EYSENCK, H.J., SYBILB. & G. EYSENCK
(1999) Manual of the Eyscnck Personality Scales (EPS Adult), Hodder & Stoughton, London Sydney Auckland.Google Scholar
EYSENCK, H. J.
(1967) The Biological Basis of Personality. Thomas, Springfield.Google Scholar
EYSENCK, H. J. and S. B. C. EYSENCK
(1973) On the Nature of Extroversion. In H. J. Eysenck, Eysenck on Extroversion. Great Britain: Fletcher and Son Ltd.Google Scholar
EYSENCK, S. B. G. & EYSENCK, H. J.
(1977) The place of impulsiveness in a dimensional system of personality. Biritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 57–68.Google Scholar
EYSENCK, S. B. G., PEARSON, P. R., EASTING, G. & ALLSOPP, J. F.
(1985) Age norms for impulsiveness, Venturesomeness and empathy in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 613–619.Google Scholar
EYSENCK, S. B. G. & ZUCKERMAN, M.
(1978) The relationship between sensation- seeking and Eysenck’s dimensions of personality, British Journal of Psychology, 69, 483–487.Google Scholar
FONTANA, D.
(1995) Psychology for Teachers. 3rd ed., Uk: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
GERBING, D. W., Ahadi, S. A. & Patron, J. H.
(1987) Toward a conceptualization of impulsivity: Components across the behavioral and self-report domains. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22, 357–379.Google Scholar
HAGHIGHI, M.
forthcoming). On the Reliability of TMU English Exam. Master’s Thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran.
HANSEN, J.
(1984) Field dependence-independence and language testing evidence from six pacific island cultures. TESOL QUARTERLY, 18, 311–24Google Scholar
HATCH, E. & A. LAZARÍAN
(1991) The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics, New York, Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
JAMIESON, J.
(1992) Cognitive Style of Reflection/Impulsivity and Field Independence/ Dependence and ESL Success. The Modern Language Journal, 76, iv, 491–501.Google Scholar
Kagan, J.
(1965) Reflection/impulsivity and reading ability in primary grade children. Child Development, 36, 609–628.Google Scholar
KAGAN, J., PEARSON, L. and WELCH, L.
(1966) Conceptual Impulsivity and Inductive Reasoning. Child Development, 37, 583–594.Google Scholar
KAGAN, J. and ROSMAN, B. L.
(1964) Cardiac and respiratory correlates of attention and an analytic attitude. Journal of Experimental child Psychology., 1, 50–63.Google Scholar
KAGAN, J., ROSMAN, B. L., DAY, D., ALBERT J. and PHILLIPS W.
(1964) Information processing in the child significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychol. Monogr., 78, 1–578.Google Scholar
KlANY, G. R.
(1997) Extroversion and Pedagogical Setting As Sources of Variation in Different Aspects of English Proficiency. Doctoral dissertation, University of Essex, The United Kingdom.Google Scholar
KlANY, G. R. and M. Nazarpour
(2001) On the Construct Validity of TMU English Exam. Paper Presented in Tabriz Azad University Conference on Issues in Language Teaching and Learning.Google Scholar
MESSER, S. B.
(1976) Reflection-Impulsivity: A Review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1026–1052.Google Scholar
MILANOVIC, M.
(1988) The construct validation of a preformance-based batery of English language prograll tests Unpublished doctoral disertation, University of London.Google Scholar
NEWSOM, R. S. and A. J. H. Gaite
(1972) The Retention of Logically Meaningful Versus Psychologically Meaningful Prose Material. Paper Presented at the Meetings of the American Educational Research Association, Minueapolis.Google Scholar
NIELSEN, J. M.
(1990) Feminist Research Methods. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.Google Scholar
OLLER, J. W.
(1979b) Language Tests at School: A Pragmatic Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1980) A Comment on specific variance versus global variance in certain EFI tests. TESOL Quarterly, 14 (4), 527–530.Google Scholar
PEARSON, P. R.
(1986) Impulsivity and Religosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 1, 89–94.Google Scholar
PIROUZNIA, M.
(1994) The Impact of Impulsivity/ Reflectivity on EFL Reading Comprehension, MA Thesis. Tehran University.Google Scholar
READENCE, J. E. & R. S. Baldin
(1978) The relationship of cognitive style and phonics instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 72: 1, 44–5.Google Scholar
SCALES, A. M.
(1984) Alternatives to Standardized Tests in Reading Eduction: Cognitive Styles and Informal Measures. Negro Educational Review, 38, 2, 99–106.Google Scholar
SPOLSKY, B.
(1973) What does it mean to know a language? Or how do yon get someone to perform his competence? In J. W. Oiler & J. C. Richards (Eds.) Focus on the learner: Pragmatic Perspectives for the language teacher (164-176). Rowley, Mass.: Newbary House.Google Scholar
STANFIELD, C., & HANSEN, J.
(1983) Field dependence-independence as a variable in second language cloze test performance. TESOL QUARTERLY, 17, 29–38.Google Scholar
WANGER, COOK, FIEDMAN and STEPHEN
(1998) Staying with their First Impulse?: The Relationship between Impulsivity/ Reflectivity, Field Dependence/ Field Independence and Answer changes on a Multiple-Choice Exam in a Fifth-Grade Sample. Journal of Research and Development in Eduction, 31, 3, 166–75.Google Scholar