Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 149/150 (2005) ► pp.1–17

Period of residence as a factor in language maintenance

Hungarian-English Bilinguals in Australia Asacase Study

| University of Melbourne
| University of Melbourne
This paper explores ‘period of residence’ as a factor in the maintenance of an immigrant language, based on the example of Hungarian in Australia. Hungarian speakers arrived in Australia from several different source countries including Hungary, Romania (Transylvania), and areas of the formers Yugoslavia (Vojvodina) and Czechoslovakia (Slovakia). The distinct waves of Hungarian speaking migrants to Australia - 1938-40; 1947-54; 1956-57; 1960s, 70s and 80s; and 1990s - reflect the close connection between sociopolitical events and immigrant source countries for speakers of Hungarian.
The data for the study comprises interviews with 22 families, encompassing all vintages and source countries noted above, supplemented by two focus groups. The study demonstrates that ‘period of residence’interacts with a number of other factors, notably country of origin, reasons for migration, and the prevailing attitudes and policies towards the reception and integration of immigrants in the host country at the time. It highlights the contradictory and ambivalent effects on language maintenance of situations of multiple identity and individual responses to conflict situations.
Published online: 1 January 2005
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.150.0.2004370
References (24)
Ambrosy, A. (1990): A Survey of the Hungarian Community in Victoria. Adelaide : Dezsery.Google Scholar
Bettoni, C. (1985): Italian language attrition - A Sydney study. In M. CLYNE (ed.), Australia Meeting-place of Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 63–79.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (1967): Transference and Triggering. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
(1997): The speech of third generation German-English bilinguals in Australia. In W. Wölck & A. De Houwer (eds.) Recent Studies in Contact Linguistics. Bonn: Dümmler, 36–43.Google Scholar
(2003): Dynamics of Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. & S. Kipp (1999) : Pericentric Languages in an Immigrant Context : Spanish, Arabic and Chinese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(forthcoming) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. Tiles in a Multilingual Mosaic: Somali, Macedonian and Filipino.
Clyne, M., H-L. Kretzenbacher& D. Schiipbach (2004) : ‘DergrötBe Schritt, den man manchmal tun könnte’: ZurAnrede im Deutschen im internationalen Vergleich’ . Sprachreport 4/2004.Google Scholar
Finnochiaro, C. (2004): Language Maintenance/Shift of a Three-Generation Italian Family in Three Migration Countries. PhD Thesis, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1991): Reversing Language Shift. Clevedon : Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2001): Can Threatened Languages be Saved? Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Giles, H. (ed.) (1977): Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations. London : Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, T. (1998): The Handbook for Focus Group Research. 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hatoss, A. (2004): Multiculturalism and mother tongue maintenance - the case of the Hungarian diaspora in Queensland. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 27 (2), 18–31.Google Scholar
Kloss, H. (1966): German American language maintenance efforts. In J. A. Fishman et al. (eds.) Language Loyalty in the United States. The Hague : Mouton de Gruyter, 206–52.Google Scholar
Kipp, S., M. Clyne & A. Pauwels (1995): Immigration and Australia’s Language Resources. Canberra : Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Kontra, M. (1996): English only’s cousin: Slovak only. Acta Lingüistica Hungarica, Vol 43 (3-4), 345 - 372.Google Scholar
Kunz, E. (1985): The Hungarians in Australia. Melbourne : AE Press.Google Scholar
Józsa-demian, E. (2003) : Hungarians. In J. JUPP (ed.) The Australian People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 421–25.Google Scholar
Neweklowsky, G. (1997) Jugoslawien. Kontaktlinguistik. (Vol 21):Goebl, H., P. Nelde, Z. Stary and W. Wölck. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1407 -1416.Google Scholar
Refatto, A. (2002): Contact Phenomena between Véneto, Italian and English in the Third Generation in Australia. PhD Thesis, Monash University.Google Scholar
Schubert, G. (1997): Rumänisch-Ungarisch. Kontaktlinguistik. (Vol 21):Goebl, H., P. Nelde, Z. Stary and W. Wölck. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1478 -1486.Google Scholar
Smolicz, J.J. (1981): Core values and ethnic identity. Ethnic and Racial Studies 4: 75–90.Google Scholar
Smolicz, J.J. & M.J. Secombe (1988): Types of language activation and evaluation in an ethnically plural societies. In U. Ammon (ed.), Status and Functions of Languages and Language Varieties. Berlin: De Gruyter, 478–511.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fernandez, Sue & Michael Clyne
2007. Tamil in Melbourne. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 28:3 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.