Cover not available
Article published In:
La centration sur l'apprenant en didactique du FLE: En hommage à Jean Binon
Sous la direction de Piet Desmet et Serge Verlinde
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 154] 2007
► pp. 41–64

La Communication Interculturelle Dans Les Affaires

| ICHEC, Institut Catholique de Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Bruxelles UCL, Université Catholique de Louvain

Article language: French

Published online: 1 January 2007
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.154.0.2023977
References (58)
ARGYLE, M. (1975). Bodily communication. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
BENNETT, J., CLAES M.-T., FORSBERG, J., FLYNN, N., OBENAUS, W, & SMITH, T. (1998). Doing effective presentations in an intercultural setting. Vienna: Ueberreuter.Google Scholar
BERNSTEIN, B. (1964). Elaborated and restricted codes. Their social origins and some consequences. Dans J.J. Gumperz & Dell Hymes (éds.), The Ethnography of Communication. American Anthropologist. 66 (6), Part II1, (pp. 55–69). Arlington: American Anthropology Association.Google Scholar
BINON, J., & CLAES, M.T. (1995). Intercultural communication and negotiation in a business environment. Dans A.A. Jensen, K. Jaeger & A. Lorentsen (éds.), Intercultural competence. A new challenge for language teachers and trainers in Europe (pp. 323–354). Aalborg: University Press.Google Scholar
BOLTEN, J. (1995). L’apprentissage interactif et interculturel des langues étrangères. Dans U. Rau (éd.) La communication interculturelle. Un concept indispensable pour un management efficace. (pp. 133–156) Montréal: Goethe Institut.Google Scholar
BROWN, P., & LEVINSON, S. C. (1978). Politeness. Some universals in language use. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 41, Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
BYRAM M., & ZARATE G. (1998). Définitions, objectifs et évaluation de la compétence socioculturelle. Apprentissage et usage des langues dans le cadre européen. Le Français dans le monde, Recherches et applications (pp. 70–96). Paris: Hachette EDICEF.Google Scholar
CONDON, J. (1981). Values and Ethics in Communication across Cultures: Some notes on the North American case. Communication, 61, 255–265.Google Scholar
CORRAZE, J. (1992). Les communications non-verbales (Coll. "Le Psychologue"). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
COSTE, D., MOORE, D., & ZARATE, G. (1997). Compétence plurilingue et pluriculturelle. Vers un Cadre Européen Commun de référence pour l’enseignement et l’apprentissage des langues vivantes: études préparatoires. Comité de l’Éducation, Conseil de la Coopération culturelle, Éditions du Conseil de l’Europe: Strasbourg.Google Scholar
EKMAN, P., & FRIESEN, W.V. (1971). Constant across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 171, 124–129.Google Scholar
(1972). Handmovements. Journal of Communication, 221, 353–374.Google Scholar
FELDMAN, R.S. (éd.)(1982). Development of nonverbal behavior in children. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
FERRARO, G.P. (1998). The cultural dimension of International Business. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
FRANCESCO, A., & GOLD, B. A. (1998). International Organisational Behavior. Readings, cases and skills. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
GALISSON, R. (1989). Lexique, langue et culture (Coll. "D.L.E.). Paris: CLE International.Google Scholar
GALLOIS, C., & CALLAN, V. (1997). Communication and Culture. A guide for practice. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
GOFFMAN, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
GREER, CH. R., & STEPHENS, G. K. (1998). Employee relations issues for U.S. Companies in Mexico. Dans A. Francesco, & B. A. Gold. (1998). International Organisational Behavior. Readings, cases and skills (pp. 363–383). Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
GUDYKUNST, W. B., & KIM, Y.Y. (1984). Communicating with strangers. An approach to Intercultural Communication. Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
GUDYKUNST, W.B., & TING-TOOMEY, S. (1988). Culture and Interpersonal Communication. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
HALL, E. T. (1955). The anthropology of Manners. Scientific American, 1921, 25–30.Google Scholar
(1959). The Silent Language (trad. fr. De Hall 1959). New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
(1963). A system for the notation of Proxemic Behavoir. American Anthropologist, 65 (5), 1003–1026.Google Scholar
(1966). The hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
(1971). La dimension cachée. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
(1976). Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
(1984). Le langage silencieux. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
HALL, E. T., & HALL, M. R. (1990). Understanding cultural differences: Germans, French and Americans. Yarmouth, Maine: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
HALL, E. T., & TRAGER, G.L. (1954). Culture and Communications: A Model and an Analysis. Explorations, 31.Google Scholar
HOFSTEDE, G. (1980). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind. Beverly Hills Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
HOLDEN, N. (1999). Formality/informality and directness/indirectness: some cross-cultural confusions. Paper presented at the Workshop on formality/informality and directness/indirectness in management contexts. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
(2000). Coping with Russia as a bad fit. Dans R. Crane (éd.). European Business Cultures (pp. 111–127). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
JOURARD, S.M. (1966). An exploratory study of body-accessibility. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 51, 221–231.Google Scholar
KOHLS, L.R. (1978). Basic concepts and models of intercultural communication. Dans M. Prosser (éd.), USIA Intercultural Communication Course, 1977 Proceedings Washington DC: US Information Agency.Google Scholar
LAMBERT, W. E. (1972). Developmental aspects of second language acquisition. Dans W.E. Lambert, Language, psychology, and culture. Essays. (pp. 9–31). Selected and introduced by Anwar S. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
LANE, H. W., DISTEFANO, J. J., & MAZNEVSKI, M. L. (1997). International Management Behaviour. Cambridge Mass: Blackwell.Google Scholar
LEEDS-HURWITZ, W., & WINKIN, Y. (1989). Eléments pour une histoire sociale de la communication interculturelle américaine: la mission du Foreign Service Institute. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 2–3, 23–41.Google Scholar
LINOWES, R. G. (1997). The Japanese Manager’s traumatic Entry into the U.S.: Understanding the American-Japanese cultural devide. Dans H. W. Lane, W. Henry, J. J. Distefano, J. Joseph & M. L. Maznevski, International Management Behaviour (pp.91–106). Cambridge Mass: Blackwell.Google Scholar
MEAD, R. (1994). International Management : Cross cultural dimensions. Cambridge Mass: Blackwell.Google Scholar
PROTHO, E.T. (1955). Arab-American differences in the judgement of written messages. Journal of Social Psychology, 421, 3–11.Google Scholar
REYNOLDS, L. (1997). The Trust Effect. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
SALO-LEE, L. (1999). The myths of directness and indirectness. Paper presented at the Workshop on formality/informality and directness/indirectness in management contexts. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
SCHEIN, E. H. (1999). The corporate culture. Survival guide. San Francico Cal: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
SEELYE, N. H., & SEELYE-JAMES, A. (1994). Culture clash. Managing in a multicultural world. Lincolnwood Ill: NTC Business Books.Google Scholar
SMITH, W.J. (1965). Message, meaning and context in ethnology. American. Nat., 9801, 405–409.Google Scholar
STALNAKER, R. C. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. Dans M. K. Munitz, & P. K. Unger (éds), Semantics and Philosophy. New York : New York University Press. Reprinted in: S. Davis (ed.)(1991). Pragmatics. A reader. Oxford: Oxford University press, pp. 471–482.Google Scholar
SUZUKI, T. (1978). Words in Context. A Japanese perspective on Language and Culture. Tokyo: Kodansha International, revised paperback edition 1984.Google Scholar
TING-TOOMEY, S. (1985). Toward a theory of conflict and culture. International and Intercultural Communicative Annual, 91, 71–86.Google Scholar
TRIANDIS, H. C. (1975). Culture Training, Cognitive Complexity and Interpersonal Attitudes. Dans R. Brislin, S. Bochner, & W. Lonner (éds.), Cross-cultural perspectives on learning (pp. 39–77). Beverly Hills CA: Sage.Google Scholar
USUNIER, J.-C. (1992). Commerce entre cultures. Une approche culturelle du marketing international. Tome I. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
(1996). Marketing across cultures. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
VÁZQUEZ-ORTA, I.-S. (1995). Summary of “A contrastive Study of Politeness. Phenomena in England and in Spain”. Series B: Applied and Interdisciplinary Papers. Paper No 268. Duisburg: Linguistic Agency of the University of Duisburg (LAUD).Google Scholar
VICTOR, D. A. (1992). International Business Communication. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
VUIJSSE, H., & VAN DER LANS, J. (1999). Typisch Nederlands. Vademecum van de Nederlandse identiteit. Amsterdam Antwerpen: Contact.Google Scholar
WATSON, O.M. (1970). Proxemic behavior. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
WEISS, S., & STRIPP, W. (1996)(1985). Negotiating with foreign business persons. An introduction for Americans with propositions on six cultures. Series B: Applied and Interdisciplinary Papers, Paper No 270. Duisburg: Linguistic Agency of the University of Duisburg (LAUD).Google Scholar
ZARATE, G. (2001). Les compétences interculturelles : définition, place dans les curricula. L’enseignement des langues vivantes. Perspectives (pp. 75–85), Les actes de la DESCO.Google Scholar