Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 155 (2008) ► pp. 23–52

‘I me Mine’ The Acquisiti on of Dutch Pronominal Possessives by L1 Children, L2 Children and L2 Adults

A Revealing Comparison

| Babylon, Centre for Studies of the Multicultural Society Tilburg University
| Babylon, Centre for Studies of the Multicultural Society Tilburg University

This study compares pronominal possessive constructions in Dutch first language (L1) acquisition, second language (L2) acquisition by young children, and untutored L2 acquisition by adults. The L2 learners all have Turkish as L1. In longitudinal spontaneous speech data for four L1 learners, seven child L2 learners, and two adult learners, remarkable differences and similarities between the three learner groups were found. In some respects, the child L2 learners develop in a way that is similar to child L1 learners, for instance in the kind of overgeneralisations that they make. However, the child L2 learners also behave like adult L2 learners; i.e., in the pace of the acquisition process, the frequency and persistence of non-target constructions, and the difficulty in acquiring reduced pronouns. The similarities between the child and adult L2 learners are remarkable, because the child L2 learners were only two years old when they started learning Dutch. L2 acquisition before the age of three is often considered to be similar to L1 acquisition. The findings might be attributable to the relatively small amount of Dutch language input the L2 children received.

Published online: 01 January 2008
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.155.0.2032363
References
Blom, E.
(2005) Agreement inflection in child L2 Dutch. GALA 2005 Proceedings. http://​home​.hum​.uva​.nl​/oz​/eblom​/GALA​-proceedings​-Blom​.pdf [On​-line].
Bol, G.
(1995) Implicational scaling in child language acquisition: The order of production of Dutch verb constructions. In M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Papers from The Dutch-German Colloquium on Language Acquisition. Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development, 66 (3).Google Scholar
Bol, G., & Kuiken, F.
(1986) Het gebruik van pronomina bij kinderen van een tot vier. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 241, 47–58.Google Scholar
Broeder, P.
(1991) Talking about people: A multiple case study on adult language acquisition. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
(1992) Possession in a new language. Applied Linguistics, 131, 100–118.Google Scholar
Clark, E.
(2003) First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A., & Gillis, S.
(1998) Dutch child language: An overview. In S. Gillis & A. De Houwer (Eds.), The acquisition of Dutch (pp. 1–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.
(2002) Frequency effects in language processing : A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 143–188.Google Scholar
(2006) Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative-cognitive CREED. AILA Review, 191, 100–121.Google Scholar
Extra, G., Aarts, R., Van der Avoird, T., Broeder, P., & Yaǧmur, K.
(2002) De andere talen van Nederland thuis en op school. Bussum: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.
(2005) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldschneider, J., & DeKeyser, R.
(2001) Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 511, 1–50.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N.
(2003) Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(2000) The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum (third edition).Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B.
(1978) Second-language acquisition in childhood. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Meisel, J.
(1991) Principles of Universal Grammar and strategies of language use: on some similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 231–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2006) Child second language acquisition or successive first language acquisition? Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA) 2006, April 27-30, Calgary.Google Scholar
Nap-Kolhoff, E.
in preparation). Bilingual development of Turkish two to four-year-old children in the Netherlands. PhD-dissertation, Tilburg University.
Odlin, T.
(2003) Cross-linguistic influence. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 436–486). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Perdue, C.
(Ed.) (1993) Adult second language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powers, S.
(1995) The acquisition of case in Dutch. In M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Papers from the Dutch-German colloquium on language acquisition. Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development, 661 (pp. 159–179).Google Scholar
Rothweiler, M.
(2006) The acquisition of V2 and subordinate clauses in early successive acquisition of German. In C. Lléo (Ed.), Interfaces in multilingualism: acquisition and representation (pp. 91–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B.
(2003) Child L2 acquisition: paving the way. In B. Beachley (Ed.), BUCLD 27 Proceedings (pp. 26–50). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Taalunie
(2007) Corpus Gesproken Nederlands. http://​www​.tst​.inl​.nl​/ [On​-line].
Taylor, J.
(1996) Possessives in English: An exploration in cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Stahl, D.
(2004) Sampling children’s spontaneous speech: How much is enough? Journal of Child Language, 311, 101–122.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S.
(2005) Child L2, Adult L2, Child L1: differences and similarities. A study on the acquisition of Direct Object scrambling in Dutch. PhD- dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
(2007) Age and input in early child bilingualism: The acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America 21. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Van de Craats, I.
(2000) Conservation in the acquisition of possessive constructions: A study of second language acquisition by Turkish and Moroccan learners of Dutch. PhD-dissertation, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Van de Craats, I., Corver, N., & Van Hout, R.
(2000) Conservation of grammatical knowledge: On the acquisition of possessive noun phrases by Turkish and Moroccan learners of Dutch. Linguistics, 381, 221–314.Google Scholar
Van der Heijden, H.
(1999) Word formation processes in young bilingual children. In G. Extra & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Bilingualism and migration (pp. 123–140). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Helvert, K.
(1985) Nederlands van en tegen Turkse kinderen. Unpublished PhD-dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Van Kampen, J., & Corver, N.
(2004) Diversity of possessor marking in Dutch child language and Dutch dialects. In M. Vliegen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 39th Linguistic Colloquium 2004 (pp. 385–398). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vermeer, A.
(1986) Tempo en struktuur van tweede-taalverwerving bij Turkse en Marokkaanse kinderen. Unpublished PhD-dissertation, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Verrips, M., & Wijnen, F.
(1998) The acquisition of Dutch syntax. In S. Gillis & A. De Houwer (Eds.), The acquisition of Dutch (pp. 223–300). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar