Editorial published In:
Learning and Teaching L2 Writing
Guest-edited by Daphne van Weijen, Elke Van Steendam and Gert Rijlaarsdam
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 156] 2008
► pp. 112
References (17)
References
Braaksma, M. A. H. (2002). Observational learning in argumentative writing. Amsterdam: Graduate School for Teaching and Learning, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Braaksma, M.A.H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., & Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M. (2004). Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction, 22 (1), 1–36.Google Scholar
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (3), 445–476.Google Scholar
Kieft, M. (2006). The effects of adapting writing instruction to students’ writing strategies. Amsterdam: Graduate School for Teaching and Learning, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
O’Brien, T. (2004). Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 37 , 1–28.Google Scholar
Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van den Bergh, H. (2004). Effective Learning and Teaching of Writing: Student involvement in the teaching of writing. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), G. Rijlaarsdam, H. v. d. Bergh & M. Couzijn (Vol. eds.), Studies in Writing Vol. 14, Effective Learning and Teaching of Writing (2 ed., pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Murphy, L., & Marín, J. (2002). A critical examination of L2 writing process research. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), S. Ransdell & M. L. Barbier (Vol Eds.), Studies in Writing Vol. 11, New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 11–47): Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Schoonen, R., Van Gelderen, A., De Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2003). First language and second language writing: the role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53 (1), 165–202.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M. (2005). Reading and writing in a foreign language; a comparison of conceptual and linguistic processes in Dutch and English. SCO-Kohnstamm Instituut van de Faculteit der Maatschappij- en Gedragswetenschappen, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & De Glopper, K. (2006). Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 151 , 201–233.Google Scholar
Torrance, M., Fidalgo, R., & García, J.-N. (2007). The teachability and effectiveness of cognitive self-regulation in sixth-grade writers. Learning and Instruction, 17 (3), 265–285.Google Scholar
Uzawa, K. (1996). Second language learners’ processes of L1 writing, L2 writing and translation from L1 into L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5 (3), 271–294.Google Scholar
Van den Akker, J., Branch, R., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, Tj. (Eds.) (1999). Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 125–136). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., Van Weijen, D., & Tillema, M. (in press). Relating process execution to writing, reading and output quality of text: consideration learner and task characteristics. In M. C. Shelley II, L. D. Yore & B. Hand (Eds.), Quality research in literacy and science education: International perspectives and gold standards. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Van Steendam, E. (2008). Effective instructional strategies in collaborative revision: Two empirical studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
Van Weijen, D. (2009), Writing processes, text quality, and task effects (Vol. 2011). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Van Weijen, D., Van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, T. (2008). The effect of writing in L1 versus L2 on process-product relations. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar