Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 168:2 (2017) ► pp. 203247
References

References

Ackema, P.
(2006) On the relation between V-to-I and the structure of the inflectional paradigm. Linguistic Review, 18, 233–263.Google Scholar
Agresti, A.
(2012) Categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E.
(1998) Parametrizing agr: Word order, V movement, and Epp-checking. Natural language and linguistic theory, 16, 491–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alderson, J. C., & Huhta, A.
(2005) The development of a suite of computer-based diagnostic tests based on the Common European Framework. Language Testing, 22, 301–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romano, F.
(2011) The role of the input, UG, and the L1 in L2 development of the IP. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Essex, UK.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
(2008) Mixed effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F.
(2005) Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(1), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Banfi, E., & Bernini, G.
(2003) Il verbo. In A. Giacalone-Ramat (Ed.), Verso l’Italiano (pp. 70–111). Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Beck, M. L.
(1998) L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English-speaking learners of German and the local impairment hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 311–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A.
(1990) Generalized verb movement. Turin: Rosenberg & Selier.Google Scholar
Berretta, M.
(1989) Interferenza ed elaborazione autonoma nell’apprendimento dell’italiano come L2. Bergamo: University of Bergamo.[ p. 244 ]Google Scholar
(1990) Il ruolo dell’infinito nel sistema verbale di apprendimento dell’italiano come L2. In G. Bernini & A. Giacalone-Ramat (Eds.), La temporalità nell’acquisizione di lingue seconde (pp. 51–80). Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J. D.
(2002) Realizing Germanic inflection: Why morphology does not drive syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 6, 129–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, H., & Rohrbacher, B.
(1997) Features and projections: Arguments for the full competence hypothesis. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on language development (pp. 24–35). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J.
(2003a) The (dis)association between morphology and syntax: The case of L2 Spanish. In S. A. Montrul & F. Ordonez (Eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages (pp. 398–417). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2003b) Learners’ competence may be more accurate than we think: Spanish L2 and agreement morphology. In J. M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th generative approaches to Second Language Acquisition (pp. 17–23). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step (pp. 89–156). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S., & Penke, M.
(1996) Lexical learning in early syntactic development. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 129–159). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S., & Vainikka, A.
(1994) The seeds of structure: A syntactic analysis of the acquisition of Case marking. In T. Joekstra & B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 85–118). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Penke, M., & Parodi, T.
(1993) Functional categories in early child German. Language Acquisition, 3, 395–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E.
(1955) Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Mauro, T., Mancini, F., Vedovelli, M., & Voghera, M.
(1993) Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Milano: Etas libri.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Modeling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 3(27), 431–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G.
(1996) Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 677–714. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, L.
(1993) On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition, 3, 183–208. Crossref[ p. 245 ]Google Scholar
Eubank, L., Bischof, J., Huffstutler, A., Leek, P., & West, C.
(1997) ‘Tom eats slowly cooked eggs’: Thematic-verb raising in L2 knowledge. Language Acquisition, 6, 171–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G.
(1991) How critical is age in adult second language acquisition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.
Gavruseva, L., & Lardiere, D.
(1996) The emergence of extended phrase structure in child L2 acquisition. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes, & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 225–236). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Giacalone-Ramat, A.
(2007) On the road: Verso l’acquisizione dell’italiano lingua seconda. In M. Chini, P. Desideri, M. E. Favilla, & G. Pallotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6° Congresso Internazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di linguistica applicata. Perugia: Guerra Edizioni.Google Scholar
Grondin, N., & White, L.
(1996) Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of French. Language Acquisition, 5, 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R.
(2001) Second Language Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haznedar, B.
(1997) L2 acquisition by a Turkish-speaking child: Evidence for L1 influence. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 245–56). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2001) The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Persistent problems with case morphology in L2 acquisition. In C. Lleó (Ed.), Interfaces in multilingualism: Acquisition and representation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B.
(1997) Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 257–268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hyams, N.
(1992) On the genesis of clausal structure. In J. Meisel (Ed.), The acquisition of verb placement, V2, and functional categories. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., & Wexler, K.
(2002) Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research, 18, 95–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakshmanan, U.
(1993) ‘The boy for the cookie’: Some evidence for the non-violation of the case filter in child second language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 3, 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(1998a) Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 14, 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998b) Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14, 359–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Maiden, M.
(2010) Italian compound nouns and the autonomy of morphology. Paper presented at the Italian Linguistics in the UK conference. University of Reading.
McCarthy, C.
(2007) Default morphology in second language Spanish: Missing inflection or underspecified inflection? In J. P. Montreuil & C. Nishida (Eds.), New perspectives on Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 35th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 201–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.[ p. 246 ]Google Scholar
(2008) Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation. Second Language Research, 24, 459–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Modeling morphological variation and development: Person and number in L2 Spanish. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 25–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J.
(1991) Principles of universal grammar and strategies of language learning: Some similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal grammar in the second language (pp. 231–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: Contrasting first and second language development. Second Language Research, 13, 227–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, I.
(2010) Typology of Finiteness. Language and Linguistic Compass, 4(12), 1176–1189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, J.
(1989) Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L.
(2000a) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition. Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000b) Finiteness and variability in SLA: More evidence for Missing Surface Inflection. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 575–586). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, I.
(2010) A deletion analysis of null subjects. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, et al. (Eds.) Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodgers, D. M.
(2011) The acquisition of verbal agreement in instructed Italian L2A. L2 Journal, 3, 93–115.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1994) Early null subjects and root null subjects. In B. Schwartz & T. Hoekstra (Eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohrbacher, B.
(1999) Morphology-driven syntax: A theory of V-to-I raising and pro-drop. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salustri, M., & Hyams, N.
(2003) Is there an analogue to the RI stage in the null subject languages? Paper presented at the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development . Boston, MA.
(2006) Looking for the universal core of the RI stage. In V. Torrens & L. Escobar (Ed.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages (pp.159–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A.
(1994) Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in Generative Grammar: Papers in honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW workshops (pp. 317–368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, Crossref[ p. 247 ]Google Scholar
(1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Linear sequencing strategies or UG defined hierarchical structures in L2 acquisition? A reply to Meisel. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian, & W. Wilkins (Eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation: In honor of Joseph E. Emonds (pp. 295–318). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stauble, A. M.
(1984) A comparison of a Spanish-English and a Japanese-English second language continuum: Negation and verb morphology. In A. W. Andersen (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition (pp. 232–353). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Vainikka, A.
(1993) Case in the development of English syntax. Language Acquisition, 3, 257–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M.
(1995) Tree growth and morphosyntactic triggers in adult SLA. Available at http://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/ircs​/reports​/131
(1996) Gradual development of L2 structure. Second Language Research, 12, 7–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Morphosyntactic triggers in adult second language acquisition. In M. L. Beck (Ed.) Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp. 339–373). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) The roots of syntax and how they grow. In S. Unsworth, T. Parodi, & A. Sorace (Eds.), Paths of development in L1 and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Minimalism vs. organic syntax. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian & W. Wilkins (Eds.) Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation: In honor of Joseph E. Emonds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The acquisition of German under an organic grammar approach. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K.
(1998) Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, L.
(2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar