Cover not available
Article published In:
Languages in Business Education: Introduction
Edited by Lieven Buysse, Karoline Claes and Erwin Snauwaert
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 161] 2011
► pp. 68–89

A Comparison of Mexican and US American Students’ Perceptions of High-Low Context Business Communication Style

| Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Cross-cultural studies (Hofstede, 1984, 1991, 2001; Hall, 1959, 1976) posit that Mexico is a more collectivistic and high context culture than the United States of America and therefore it could be claimed that Mexicans will communicate and perceive professional communication in a different way than US Americans. In contrast, professional communication and social (psychology) studies argue that in order to communicate in a truly intercultural way it is necessary to go beyond the frame of cultural dimensions, since shared professional and educational frameworks could override the impact of cultural differences in professional settings. While empirical evidence so far has shown mixed results, the results of this article provide additional evidence to support the view that the two cited cultural dimensions have been overridden, since the Mexican (N=280) and US American (N=300) student samples showed a rather similar perception of professional dialogues in a monocultural as well as in an intercultural communication setting. A shared framework of knowledge and skills, the impact of the new media and technologies, the virtual and real intercultural encounters between Mexicans and US Americans, their shared educational level, and the fact that nearly all of the Mexican participants reported to speak English as a foreign language and that a majority of the US American participants reported to speak Spanish as a foreign language, could explain, at least for the studied samples, the observed convergence.
Published online: 1 January 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.161.05hoo
References (54)
References
Albert, R. D., & Ah Ha, I. (2004). Latino/Anglo-American differences in attributions to situations involving touch and silence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 281, 253–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alred, G. J. (1997). Teaching in Germany and the rhetoric of culture. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 111, 353–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baty, R., & Dold, D. (1977). Cross-cultural home stays: An analysis of college students’ responses after living in an unfamiliar culture. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1(1), 61–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beamer, L. (2003). Directness in Chinese business correspondence of the nineteenth century. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 171, 201–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. H., Dillon, W. & Becker, H. (1995). German memo and letter style. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 91, 219–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. M. (1986). Modes of cross-cultural training: Conceptualizing cross-cultural training as education. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(2), 117–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In C. H. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology. Methodology (pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
(2000). Understanding Culture’s Influence on Behavior (2nd edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Bond, M. H., & Cheung, T. S. (1983). College students’ spontaneous self-concept: the effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 14(2), 153–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardon, P. W. (2008). A Critique of Hall’s contexting model. A meta-analysis of literature on intercultural business and technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(4), 399–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analyses for the Behavioural Sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Conaway, R. N., & Wardrope, W. J. (2004). Communication in Latin America: An analysis of Guatemalan business letters. Business Communication Quarterly, 671, 465–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connor, U. M., Davis, K. W., De Rycker, T., Phillips, E. M., & Verckens, J. P. (1997). An international course in international business writing: Belgium, Finland, and the United States. Business Communication Quarterly, 601, 63–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dueñas Mur, P. (2010). Attitude markers in business management research articles: a cross-cultural corpus-driven approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 50–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evia, C. (2004). Technical communication learning on the U.S.-Mexico border: Factors affecting cross-cultural competence in globalized settings. Business Communication Quarterly, 67(2), 233–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gudykunst, W., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyeman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 221(4), 510–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gudykunst, W., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Culture and interpersonal communication. Newbury Pk., CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. New York: Doubleday & Company.Google Scholar
(1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1990). Hidden differences. Doing business with the Japanese. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Heydenfeldt, J. A. G. (2000). The influence of individualism-collectivism on Mexican and US business negotiation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(3), 383–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
(1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
(2001). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
(2010). ITIM. Geert Hofstede™ cultural dimensions. Retrieved on 10 March 2010 from: [URL].
Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Landis, D., & Wasilewski, J. H. (1999). Reflections on 22 years of the International Journal of Intercultural Relations and 23 years in other areas of intercultural practice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(4), 535–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewin, K. (1936). Some social-psychological differences between the United States and Germany. Character and Personality, 41, 265–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louhiala-Salminen, L., Charles, M. & Kankaanranta, A. (2005). English as a lingua franca in Nordic corporate mergers: Two case companies. English for Specific Purposes, 24(4), 401–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. (1976). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 961–978. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray-Johnson, L., Witte, K., Liu, W.-Y., & Hubbell, A. P. (2001). Addressing cultural orientations in fear appeals: Promoting AIDS-protective behaviors among Mexican immigrant and African American adolescents and American and Taiwanese college students. Journal of Health Communication, 61, 335–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, L. A. (2005). Cruzando las fronteras de la comunicación profesional entre México y los Estados Unidos. The emerging hybrid discourse of business communication in a Mexican-U.S. border region. Journal of Business Communication, 42(1), 28–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paulin, M., Ferguson, R. J., & Alvarez Salazar, A. M. (1999). External effectiveness of service management. A study of business-to-business relationships in Mexico, Canada and the USA. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10 (5), 409–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubin, R. B., Collado, R. F., & Hernández-Sampieri, R. (1992). A cross-cultural examination of interpersonal communication motives in Mexico and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 161, 145–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 1–65). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., & Ros, M. (1995). Values in the West: A theoretical and empirical challenge to the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension. World Psychology, 11, 91–122.Google Scholar
Singelis, T. M., & Brown, W. J. (1995). Culture, self, and collectivist communication. Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 211, 354–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slater, C. L., Boone, M., Price, L., Martinez, D., Alvarez, I., & Topete, C. (2002). A cross-cultural investigation of leadership in the United States and Mexico. School Leadership & Management, 22(2), 197–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, B. (2000). Russian teaching contracts: An examination of cultural influence and genre. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 141, 38–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tebeaux, E. (1999). Designing written business communication along the shifting cultural continuum: The new face of Mexico. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13(1), 49–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, B. (1999). Cultural and rhetorical adaptations for South American audiences. Technical Communication, 461, 177–195.Google Scholar
(2006). Intercultural rhetoric, technology transfer, and writing in U.S.-Mexico border maquilas. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(3), 383–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. (1998). Contexting Koreans: Does the high/low model work? Business Communication Quarterly, 611, 9–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asian, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives of self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trompenaars, F. (2000). Riding the waves of culture. Understanding cultural diversity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
Uber Grosse, Ch. (2001). Mexican managers’ perceptions of cultural competence. Foreign Language Annals, 34(4), 334–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varner, I. I. (2000). The theoretical foundation for intercultural business communication: A conceptual model. The Journal of Business Communication, 37(1), 39–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Teaching intercultural management communication: Where are we? Where do we go? Business Communication Quarterly, 641, 99–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Würtz, E. (2006). Intercultural communication on web sites: A cross-cultural analysis of web sites from high-context cultures and low-context cultures. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 111, 274–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yum, J. O. (1991). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationship and communication patterns in East Asia. In L. Samovar & R. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication (pp. 78–88). Belmont, CA: WadsworthGoogle Scholar
Zaidman, N. (2001). Cultural codes and language strategies in business communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 408–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Velez-Calle, Andres, Santiago Sosa & Joshua Large
2021. Cultural communication style and international joint venture contract length. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 21:3 ► pp. 491 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.