Article published in:Languages in Business Education: Introduction
Edited by Lieven Buysse, Karoline Claes and Erwin Snauwaert
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 161] 2011
► pp. 111–123
If all Business Education Were in English, Would it Matter?
Increasingly, English is becoming the dominant language of business education. The reasons are well known: internationalization, globalization, and the desire to prepare students for the business environment in the coming decades. This paper speculates about the impact of English-medium instruction in business education on the nature of English proficiency, the nature of the content learned, and the perspective for business practice. Firstly, students can learn content effectively through a foreign language, and have been doing so for centuries. However, with English-medium instruction in a non-English-speaking environment, the growth in language competences in English may rather lie in specific skills, with the acceptance of ‘fossilized’ language use, reduced accuracy and less nuanced communication, even if CLIL approaches are adopted. Secondly, regarding the impact on content learning, it is possible that the learning itself may be relatively unaffected, but if both students and staff have a less accurate and less nuanced competence in English, the expressive competences may be affected. Thirdly, a language imposes its own perspectives on the world. Business education through the medium of English may engender an English filter on students’ perspectives on business practices and communication. This paper suggests that this matters.
Published online: 01 January 2011
Cited by 2 other publications
Sew, Jyh Wee
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Dijcks, R., Dolmans, D., & Glatz, J.
English for Specific Purposes
Gill, S. K.
(2002) Using language economics and education economics in language education policy. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Language Policy Division. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/source/grinen.pdf
Hellekjaer, G. O.
Hellekjaer, G. O., & Wilkinson, R.
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G.-J.
Hommes, J., & Muysken, J.
Jochems, W., Snippe, J., Smid, H. J., & Verweij, A.
Kassis-Henderson, J., Lecomte, P., & Vigier, M.
Maiworm, F., & Wächter, B.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R.
McDowell, M., Thom, R., Frank, R. H., & Bernanke, B.
(2009, December 16) Linguists unite against English invasion. Swiss Info.com. Retrieved on 20 May 2010, from http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/culture/Linguists_unite_against_English_invasion.html?cid=7911192
(2003) A concept of international English and related issues: from ‘real English’ to ‘realistic English’? Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Language Policy Division. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/source/seidlhoferen.pdf
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M.
(2002) Key aspects of the use of English in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Language Policy Division. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/source/truchoten.pdf.
Vinke, A. A.
Wächter, B., & Maiworm, F.
Wilhelmer, N., & Unterberger, B.
(2005) The impact of language on teaching content: Views from the content teacher. Paper presented at Bi-and Multilingual Universities Conference, Helsinki, 2005. Retrieved from http://www.palmenia.helsinki.fi/congress/bilingual2005/presentations/wilkinson.pdf.
Wilkinson, R. & Geerligs, T.