Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 166:2 (2015) ► pp.254–277
Vol. 166:2 (2015) ► pp.254–277
Plain English
Applying principles to home school written communication considering diverse families
Schools attempting to engage with the families of all learners, including those with culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds recognize the importance of oral and written communication that is written using understandable English. Using the basic principles of plain English coupled with speech act theory we began to investigate different aspects of text and functional intent. This exploratory research examined exemplar pieces of written school generated communication, using different forms of linguistic analysis to determine whether the communication contained elements recognized to facilitate or impede the comprehensibility of each piece of communication. Additionally, a text assessment tool which can help schools to analyze the written text communication they send to families was developed and refined.
References (51)
Albert, T., & Chadwick, S. (1992). How readable are practice leaflets? British Medical Journal, 3051, 1266–1268. 
Arvani, M. (2006). A discourse analysis of business letters written by Iranians and native speakers. The Asian ESP Journal, 11, 12–23.
Assy, R. (2011). Can the law speak directly to its subjects? The limitation of plain language. Journal of Law and Society, 38(3), 376–404.
Auerbach, S. (2009). Walking the walk: Portraits in leadership for family engagement in urban schools. School Community Journal, 19(1), 9–32.
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Blundell, J., Higgens, J., & Middlemess, N. (1982). Function in English. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Carreon, G.P., Drake, C., & Barton, A.C. (2005). The importance of presence: Immigrant parents’ school engagement experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 42 (3), 465–498.
Chapelle, C.A., & Duff, P.A. (2003). Some guidelines for conducting quantitative and qualitative research in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 37(1), p. 157–178.
Coady, M.R., Cruz-Davis, J., & Flores, C.G. (2009). Personalmente: Home–school communication practices with (im)migrant families in North Florida. Bilingual Research Journal, 31(1-2), 251–270.
Cutts, M. (2013). Oxford guide to plain English (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cummins, J. (2001). An introductory reader to the writings of Jim Cummins. In C. Baker & N.H. Hornberger (Eds.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Dale, E., & Chall, J.S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 11–28.
Dorney, J.M. (1988). ERIC/RCS Report: The Plain English Movement. English Journal, 77(3), 49–51.
Dyson, L.L. (2001). Home-school communication and expectations of recent Chinese immigrants. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne de l’Éducation, 26(4), 455–476.
Epstein, J. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 701–712.
de Fátima Cardoso Gomes, M., Mortimer, E.F., & Kelly, G.J. (2011). Contrasting stories of inclusion/exclusion in the chemistry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 747–772.
Fitzgerald, J., & Watkins, M. (2006). Parents’ rights in special education: The readability of procedural safeguards. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 497–510.
Fry, E. (2002). Readability versus leveling: Both of these procedures can help teachers select books for readers at different stages. The Reading Teacher, 561, 286–292.
Greenfield, B.Q., Quiroz, B., Rothstein-Fisch, C., & Trumbull, E. (2001). Bridging cultures between home and school: A guide for teachers with a special focus on Latino families. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Griffith, J. (1998). The relation of school structure and social environment to parent involvement in elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 99(1), 53–80.
Gunnarsson, B. (1997). Applied discourse analysis in discourse as social interaction. In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 285–312). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Guthrie, T. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(1), 1–30.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1975). The context of linguistics. In F.P.> Dinneen (Ed.), Report of the 25th annual roundtable meeting on linguistics and language study. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Harris, M. (1976). History and significance of the Emic/Etic distinction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 51, 329–350.
Hastings, J.S., & Weinstein, J. (2008). Information, school choice, and academic achievement: Evidence from two experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1373–1414.
Hill, N.E., & Tyson, D. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763.
Hochhauser, M. (1997). Some overlooked aspects of consent form readability. Ethics and Human Research, 19(5), 5–9.
Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Howard, K., & Lipinoga, S. (2010). Closing down openings: Pretextuality and misunderstanding in parent–teacher conferences with Mexican immigrant families. Language and Communication, 30(10), 33–47.
Humfress, H., & Schmidt, U. (1999). Readability of user leaflets. Psychiatric Bulletin, 231, 272–276.
Huntsinger, C., & Jose, P. (2009). Parental involvement in children’s schooling: Different meanings in different cultures. Early Childhood Research Journal, 24(4), 398–410.
Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Kimble, J. (1992). Plain English: A charter for clear writing. TM Cooley L. Rev., 9(1), 11–14.
Klare, G.R. (1974). Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 101, 62–102.
Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and practices of second language acquisition. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
Lapp, D., Fisher, D., & Grant, M. (2008). “You can read this text- I’ll show you how”: Interactive comprehension instruction. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51(5), 372–383.
Lightfoot, S.L. (2003). The essential conversation: What parents and teachers can learn from each other. New York, NY: Ballantine.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.C. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Linse, C.T. (2010). Creating taxonomies to improve school–home connections with families of culturally and linguistically diverse learners. Education and Urban Society 421, 207–429.
Lipsit, M. (2003). Newcomers left behind: Immigrant parents lack access to New York City schools. New York, NY: Center for New York City Affairs, Milano Graduate School of Management and Urban Policy, New School University. Retrieved 18 February, 2012 from: <[URL]>
Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2014). Regulation and financial disclosure: The impact of plain English. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 45(1), 94–113.
McLaughlin, G.H. (1969). SMOG grading: A new readability formula. Journal of reading, 12(8), 639–646.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds. London, UK: Routledge.
Orwell, G. (1946). Politics and the English language. The Penguin essays of George Orwell (pp. 348–360). London: Penguin.
Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. London, UK: Sage.
Searle, J.R. (1963). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
Thrush, E.A. (2001). Plain English? A study of plain English vocabulary and international audiences. Technical Communication, 48(3), 289–296.
Vang, C.T. (2006). Minority parents should know more about school culture and its impact on their children’s education. Multicultural Education, 14(1), 20.