Article published in:ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 166:2 (2015) ► pp. 307–329
Pushed output in a multi-stage dictogloss task
An investigation into the noticing function of output
The present study set out to determine how learners’ written production would affect their noticing and production of a specific language form (the English 3rd person singular present tense marker -s) upon receiving relevant input subsequently, in an attempt to contribute to the ongoing debate about how production affects noticing of linguistic forms. One hundred and eighteen (118) English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) learners (age range 15–6) in two educational contexts (Content and Language Integrated Learning and mainstream EFL) carried out a multi-stage dictogloss task. They followed the usual steps in this type of task (listen and jot down key words, text reconstruction). Then the experimental group (EG) listened to the text once again and compared it with their reconstructed version of the original passage. Their production of the target feature was compared to that of a control group (CG) who did not receive input after their own reconstruction. Results showed that the difference between the EG and the CG in the amount of instances of the target feature produced in the dictogloss task did not reach statistical significance. In other words, the act of producing and subsequent exposure to relevant input did not affect the noticing and production of the morpheme under study. In addition, no interaction between the pushed output condition and the educational context was found.
Keywords: noticing, output-input-output cycle, the English 3rd person singular present tense marker -s, dictogloss, Content and Language Integrated Learning
Published online: 21 January 2016
Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G., & de Bot, K.
Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S.D.
Basterrechea, M., & García Mayo, M.P.
Basterrechea, M., García Mayo, M.P., & Leeser, M.J.
Council of Europe
De Graaff, R., Koopman, G.J., Anikina, Y., & Westhoff, G.
Eurydice European Network
(2006) Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/ressources/eurydice/pdf/0_integral/071EN.pdf
García Mayo, M.P.
García Mayo, M.P., & Villarreal Olaizola, I.
Gass, S., & Mackey, A.
Goldshneider, J., & DeKeyser, R.
Ionin, T., & Wexler, K.
Izumi, S., & Bigelow, M.
Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., & Fearnow, S.
(2005) CLIL in Finland. In The CLIL quality matrix. Central workshop report, coord. D. Marsh. Retrieved from http://www.ecml.at/mtp2/CLILmatrix/pdf/wsrepD3E2005_6.pdf
Llinares, A., & Whittaker, R.
Luk, Z.P., & Shirai, Y.
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K.
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M.
Scott, M., & Tucker, G.
Sharwood Smith, M.
Song, M.-J., & Suh, B.-R.
Suzuki, W., & Itagaki, N.