Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 167:1 (2016) ► pp. 16–45

Investigating models for second language spelling

In spelling research, data is easily quantifiable and offers a possible glimpse into the mind’s cognitive mechanisms. Previous research has focused on two cognitive routes assumed to be used for spelling in differing situations: one route enabling spelling of words from our lexical memory, and another route facilitating sublexically constructed spellings based on a writer’s rules for how phonemes map to graphemes. As the dual-route model emerged from first language alphabetic spelling data, there is a lack of research which synthesizes second language research with first language spelling models. This paper’s analysis of second language spellings suggests that the traditional dual-route model of spelling may not be universally applicable to second language spellers. Instead, the data suggests that consideration of the differences between L1 and L2 writing systems may help identify directions towards developing a comprehensive model of second language spelling.
Published online: 29 September 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.167.1.02ham
References
Agresti, A
(2007) An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Best, C.T
(1994) The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J.C. Goodman & H.C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, G.D., & Ellis, N.C
(1994) Handbook of spelling: Theory, process, and intervention. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Brown, H.D
(1970) Categories of spelling difficulty in speakers of English as a first and second language. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(2), 232–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Browne, C., & Culligan, B
(2008) Combining technology and IRT testing to build student knowledge of high frequency vocabulary. The JALT CALL Journal, 4(2), 3–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bullinaria, J.A
(1994) Connectionist modelling of spelling. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 78–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Callan, A.M., Callan, D.E., & Masaki, S
(2005) When meaningless symbols become letters: Neural activity change in learning new phonograms. Neuroimage, 28(3), 553–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M.J
(2001) The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 751–774. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carney, E
(1994) A survey of English spelling. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M
(1981) The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(4), 497–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V.J
(1997) L2 users and English spelling. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 18(6), 474–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S.A., Cobb, T., & McNamara, D.S
(2013) Comparing count-based and band-based indices of word frequency: Implications for active vocabulary research and pedagogical applications. System, 41(4), 965–981. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, D.W
(1988) American English spelling: An informal description. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J
(Eds.) (2007) Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W.J
(1999) Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 496–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Figueredo, L
(2006) Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 873–905. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J.E., MacKay, I.R.A., & Meador, D
(1999) Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Folk, J.R., Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M
(2002) The interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: What’s the point? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19(7), 653–671. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, T.G., Watson Todd, R., & Facundes, N
(2010) Unique categories of errors in Thai spellings of English. In V. Sagaravasi (Ed.), NIDA 2nd Annual Conference on Language and Communication Proceedings (pp. 97–105). Bangkok, Thailand: National Institute of Development Administration.Google Scholar
(2012) Reassessing traditional spelling theories from a second language perspective. In P. Subphadoongchone (Ed.), The 32nd Thailand TESOL International Conference Proceedings 2012 (pp. 77–94). Bangkok, Thailand: Thailand TESOL.Google Scholar
Hanna, P.R., Hanna, J.S., Hodges, R.E., & Rudorf, E.H
(1966) Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M
(2003) Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(2), 115–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huibregtse, I., Admiraal, W., & Meara, P
(2002) Scores on a yes-no vocabulary test: Correction for guessing and response style. Language Testing, 19(3), 227–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibrahim, M.H
(1978) Patterns in spelling errors. ELT Journal, 32(3), 207–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, J.C., & Park, S.G
(1997) Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(3), 343–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jared, D
(2002) Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 723–750. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G.V
(1985) Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication. Brain and Language, 24(1), 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L., & Frost, R
(1992) The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, B., & Treiman, R
(1997) Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(3), 295–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 592–617. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Is English spelling chaotic? Misconceptions concerning its irregularity. Reading Psychology, 241, 267–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreiner, D.S., & Gough, P.B
(1990) Two ideas about spelling: Rules and word-specific memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 103–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lester, M
(1964) Graphemic-phonemic correspondences as the basis for teaching spelling. Elementary English, 41(7), 748–752. Retrieved from http://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/41385716Google Scholar
Lété, B., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M
(2008) Consistency and word-frequency effects on spelling among first-to fifth-grade French children: A regression-based study. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(4), 952–977. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, P
(2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I.S.P., & Heatley, A
(2002) Range: A program for the analysis of vocabulary in texts [software]. Downloadable from http://​www​.vuw​.ac​.nz​/lals​/staff​/paul​-nation​/nation​.aspx
Olson, A., & Caramazza, A
(1994) Representation and connectionist models: The NETspell experience. In G.A. Brown & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), The handbook of normal and disturbed spelling development: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 337–363). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Peereman, R., & Content, A
(1999) LEXOP: A lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(2), 376–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S., & Patterson, K
(1996) Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rapcsak, S.Z., Henry, M.L., Teague, S.L., Carnahan, S.D., & Beeson, P.M
(2007) Do dual-route models accurately predict reading and spelling performance in individuals with acquired alexia and agraphia? Neuropsychologia, 45(11), 2519–2524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M
(2002) 358, 534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 55(4), 1339–1362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rey, A., Jacobs, A.M., Schmidt-Weigand, F., & Ziegler, J.C
(1998) A phoneme effect in visual word recognition. Cognition, 68(3), B71–B80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D
(2014) A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47(04), 484–503. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M.S
(1985) The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition. In D. Besner, T.G. Waller, & E.M. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 51, pp. 199–252). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, K
(2007) Predicting children’s word‐spelling difficulty for common English words from measures of orthographic transparency, phonemic and graphemic length and word frequency. British Journal of Psychology, 98(2), 305–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sun-Alperin, M.K., & Wang, M
(2008) Spanish-speaking children’s spelling errors with English vowel sounds that are represented by different graphemes in English and Spanish words. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 932–948. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tainturier, M.J., Bosse, M.L., Roberts, D.J., Valdois, S., & Rapp, B
(2013) Lexical neighborhood effects in pseudoword spelling. Frontiers in Psychology, 41, 862. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Venezky, R.L
(1970) The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., & Geva, E
(2003) Spelling performance of Chinese children using English as a second language: Lexical and visual-orthographic processes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waters, G.S., & Seidenberg, M.S
(1985) Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition, 13(6), 557–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watson Todd, R
(2013) Identifying new knowledge in texts through corpus analysis. International Journal of Language Studies, 7(4), 57–76. Retrieved from http://​www​.ijls​.net​/vol7no4​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Wei, Y
(2005) The relationship between phonological awareness and reading ability of Thai students in English and Thai in primary schools of Thailand. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
Webb, S
(2008) Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(01), 79–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar