Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 167:1 (2016) ► pp.16–45
Vol. 167:1 (2016) ► pp.16–45
Investigating models for second language spelling
In spelling research, data is easily quantifiable and offers a possible glimpse into the mind’s cognitive mechanisms. Previous research has focused on two cognitive routes assumed to be used for spelling in differing situations: one route enabling spelling of words from our lexical memory, and another route facilitating sublexically constructed spellings based on a writer’s rules for how phonemes map to graphemes. As the dual-route model emerged from first language alphabetic spelling data, there is a lack of research which synthesizes second language research with first language spelling models. This paper’s analysis of second language spellings suggests that the traditional dual-route model of spelling may not be universally applicable to second language spellers. Instead, the data suggests that consideration of the differences between L1 and L2 writing systems may help identify directions towards developing a comprehensive model of second language spelling.
References (53)
Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley. 
Best, C.T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J.C. Goodman & H.C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brown, G.D., & Ellis, N.C. (1994). Handbook of spelling: Theory, process, and intervention. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Brown, H.D. (1970). Categories of spelling difficulty in speakers of English as a first and second language. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(2), 232–236.
Browne, C., & Culligan, B. (2008). Combining technology and IRT testing to build student knowledge of high frequency vocabulary. The JALT CALL Journal, 4(2), 3–16.
Bullinaria, J.A. (1994). Connectionist modelling of spelling. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 78–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Callan, A.M., Callan, D.E., & Masaki, S. (2005). When meaningless symbols become letters: Neural activity change in learning new phonograms. Neuroimage, 28(3), 553–562.
Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M.J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 751–774.
Carney, E. (1994). A survey of English spelling. London: Routledge.
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(4), 497–505.
Cook, V.J. (1997). L2 users and English spelling. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 18(6), 474–488.
Crossley, S.A., Cobb, T., & McNamara, D.S. (2013). Comparing count-based and band-based indices of word frequency: Implications for active vocabulary research and pedagogical applications. System, 41(4), 965–981.
Cummings, D.W. (1988). American English spelling: An informal description. Baltimore: JHU Press.
Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.). (2007). Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W.J. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 496–518.
Figueredo, L. (2006). Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 873–905.
Flege, J.E., MacKay, I.R.A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987.
Folk, J.R., Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2002). The interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: What’s the point? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19(7), 653–671.
Hamilton, T.G., Watson Todd, R., & Facundes, N. (2010). Unique categories of errors in Thai spellings of English. In V. Sagaravasi (Ed.), NIDA 2nd Annual Conference on Language and Communication Proceedings (pp. 97–105). Bangkok, Thailand: National Institute of Development Administration.
. (2012). Reassessing traditional spelling theories from a second language perspective. In P. Subphadoongchone (Ed.), The 32nd Thailand TESOL International Conference Proceedings 2012 (pp. 77–94). Bangkok, Thailand: Thailand TESOL.
Hanna, P.R., Hanna, J.S., Hodges, R.E., & Rudorf, E.H. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(2), 115–162.
Huibregtse, I., Admiraal, W., & Meara, P. (2002). Scores on a yes-no vocabulary test: Correction for guessing and response style. Language Testing, 19(3), 227–245.
Ibrahim, M.H. (1978). Patterns in spelling errors. ELT Journal, 32(3), 207–212.
Ingram, J.C., & Park, S.G. (1997). Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(3), 343–370.
Jared, D. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 723–750.
Jones, G.V. (1985). Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication. Brain and Language, 24(1), 1–19.
Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland Press.
Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (1997). Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(3), 295–311.
. (2001). Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 592–617.
. (2003). Is English spelling chaotic? Misconceptions concerning its irregularity. Reading Psychology, 241, 267–289.
Kreiner, D.S., & Gough, P.B. (1990). Two ideas about spelling: Rules and word-specific memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 103–118.
Lester, M. (1964). Graphemic-phonemic correspondences as the basis for teaching spelling. Elementary English, 41(7), 748–752. Retrieved from [URL]
Lété, B., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2008). Consistency and word-frequency effects on spelling among first-to fifth-grade French children: A regression-based study. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(4), 952–977.
Nation, P., (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82.
Nation, I.S.P., & Heatley, A. (2002). Range: A program for the analysis of vocabulary in texts [software]. Downloadable from [URL]
Olson, A., & Caramazza, A. (1994). Representation and connectionist models: The NETspell experience. In G.A. Brown & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), The handbook of normal and disturbed spelling development: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 337–363). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1999). LEXOP: A lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(2), 376–379.
Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56.
Rapcsak, S.Z., Henry, M.L., Teague, S.L., Carnahan, S.D., & Beeson, P.M. (2007). Do dual-route models accurately predict reading and spelling performance in individuals with acquired alexia and agraphia? Neuropsychologia, 45(11), 2519–2524.
Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358, 534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 55(4), 1339–1362.
Rey, A., Jacobs, A.M., Schmidt-Weigand, F., & Ziegler, J.C. (1998). A phoneme effect in visual word recognition. Cognition, 68(3), B71–B80.
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47(04), 484–503.
Seidenberg, M.S. (1985). The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition. In D. Besner, T.G. Waller, & E.M. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 51, pp. 199–252). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Spencer, K. (2007). Predicting children’s word‐spelling difficulty for common English words from measures of orthographic transparency, phonemic and graphemic length and word frequency. British Journal of Psychology, 98(2), 305–338.
Sun-Alperin, M.K., & Wang, M. (2008). Spanish-speaking children’s spelling errors with English vowel sounds that are represented by different graphemes in English and Spanish words. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 932–948.
Tainturier, M.J., Bosse, M.L., Roberts, D.J., Valdois, S., & Rapp, B. (2013). Lexical neighborhood effects in pseudoword spelling. Frontiers in Psychology, 41, 862.
Venezky, R.L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.
Wang, M., & Geva, E. (2003). Spelling performance of Chinese children using English as a second language: Lexical and visual-orthographic processes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 1–26.
Waters, G.S., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition, 13(6), 557–572.
Watson Todd, R. (2013). Identifying new knowledge in texts through corpus analysis. International Journal of Language Studies, 7(4), 57–76. Retrieved from [URL]
Wei, Y. (2005). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading ability of Thai students in English and Thai in primary schools of Thailand. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Webb, S. (2008). Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(01), 79–95.