Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 167:1 (2016) ► pp. 46–77

Exploring and reshaping learners’ beliefs about the usefulness of corrective feedback

A sociocultural perspective

| University of Jyvaskyla
A number of studies have shown that learners’ beliefs about the usefulness of corrective feedback for improving their L2 (a second or a foreign language) use influences the extent to which learners can utilize that same feedback. It seems, then, that changing some of these beliefs could benefit the L2 learning process. The present article reports on two small-scale studies, both drawing on a sociocultural perspective on the development of beliefs. Changes in learners’ beliefs about corrective feedback were observed both within a period of six months (Case study) and over the course of one research interview (Group study). The studies exemplify how the interplay of one’s own and other’s experience, others’ mediation, and authoritative voices facilitated these changes.
Keywords: dynamic assessment, social interaction, learners' beliefs, sociocultural theory, feedback
Published online: 29 September 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.167.1.03leo
References
Alanen, R
(2003) A sociocultural approach to young language learners’ belief about language learning. In P. Kalaja & A.M.F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 55–85). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Noticing and mediation: A sociocultural perspective. In J.M. Bergsleithner, S.N. Frota, & J.K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 315–325). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J.P
(1994) Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Amrhein, H.R., & Nassaji, H
(2010) Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers think is right and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquee, 13(2), 95–127. Retrieved from https://​journals​.lib​.unb​.ca​/index​.php​/CJAL​/article​/view​/19886​/21712Google Scholar
Aro, M
(2009) Speakers and doers: Polyphony and agency in children’s beliefs about language learning (Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland). Retrieved from https://​jyx​.jyu​.fi​/dspace​/handle​/123456789​/19882Google Scholar
Ashwell, T
(2000) Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M
(1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
(1986) Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barcelos, A.M.F
(2003) Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In P. Kalaja & A.M.F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 7–33). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barcelos, A.M.F., & Kalaja, P
(2013) Beliefs in second language acquisition: Teacher. In C.A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. New York: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Bråten, I
(1991a) Vygotsky as precursor to metacognitive theory: I. The concept of metacognition and its roots. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 35(3), 179–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991b) Vygotsky as precursor to metacognitive theory: II. Vygotsky as metacognitivist. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 35(4), 305–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A.V
(2009) Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M
(1996) Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cornillie, F., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P
(2012) Between learning and playing? Exploring learners’ perceptions of corrective feedback in an immersive game for English pragmatics. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 24(03), 257–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diab, R.L
(2005) Teachers’ and students’ beliefs about responding to ESL writing: A case study. TESL Canada Journal, 23(1), 28–43. Retrieved from http://​www​.teslcanadajournal​.ca​/index​.php​/tesl​/article​/view​/76 DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dufva, H
(2003) Beliefs in dialogue: A Bakhtinian view. In P. Kalaja & A.M.F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 131–151). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The contribution of the Bakhtin Circle to the psychology of language. In M. Nenonen (Ed.), Papers from the 30th Finnish Conference of Linguistics (pp. 21–26). Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, F
(1961) A comparative study of two hesitation phenomena. Language and Speech, 4(1), 18–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N
(1994) Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39(1), 141–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heift, T
(2002) Learner control and error correction in ICALL: Browsers, peekers, and adamants. Calico Journal, 19(2), 295–313. Retrieved from http://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/24149363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, E.K
(1985) Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18(4), 333–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, F
(2003) Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kalaja, P., & Barcelos, A.M.F
(2013) Beliefs in second language acquisition: Learner. In C.A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. New York: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Kern, R.G
(1995) Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 71–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kozulin, A
(1998) Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leki, I
(1991) The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leontjev, D
(2014) The effect of automated adaptive corrective feedback: L2 English questions. APPLES: Journal of applied language studies, 8(2), 43–66. Retrieved from http://​apples​.jyu​.fi​/ArticleFile​/download​/459Google Scholar
Mercer, S
(2011) Language learner self-concept: Complexity, continuity and change. System, 39(3), 335–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I.S.P
(2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Mills, S.V
(2006) An exploratory study of differing perceptions of error correction between a teacher and students: Bridging the gap. Applied Language Learning, 16(1), 55–74. Retrieved from http://​www​.dliflc​.edu​/wp​-content​/uploads​/2014​/04​/all16one​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Poehner, M.E
(2008) Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poehner, M.E, & Lantolf, J.P
(2013) Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during Computerized Dynamic Assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pujolà, J
(2001) Did CALL feedback feed back? Researching learners’ use of feedback. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 13(1), 79–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Põhikooli riiklik õppekava õigusakt: Lisa 1 [Basic School National Curriculum Act: Annex 1]
(2010) Pub. L. No. RT I 2010, 61, 22. Retrieved from https://​www​.riigiteataja​.ee​/aktilisa​/1281​/2201​/0017​/13275423​.pdf
Saito, H
(1994) Teachers’ practices and students’ preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 46–69. Retrieved from http://​www​.teslcanadajournal​.ca​/index​.php​/tesl​/article​/view​/633 DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sato, M
(2013) Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 611–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, R.A
(2001) Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teo, A
(2012) Promoting EFL students’ inferential reading skills through computerized dynamic assessment. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 10–20. Retrieved from http://​llt​.msu​.edu​/issues​/october2012​/action​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Thouësny, S
(2011) Dynamically assessing written language: To what extent do learners of French language accept mediation? In S. Thouësny & L. Bradley (Eds.), Second language teaching and learning with technology: Views of emergent researchers (pp. 169–188). Dublin: Research-publishing.net.Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, E., Puuronen, S., Pechenizkiy, M., & Rasanen, P
(2007) Feedback adaptation in web-based learning systems. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 17(4-5), 337–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S
(1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wenden, A
(1987) Metacognition: An expanded view of the cognitive abilities of L2 learners. Language Learning, 37(4), 573–597. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J.V
(1991) A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 85–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yoshida, R
(2010) How do teachers and learners perceive corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom? The Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 293–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Ha, Xuan Van & Loc Tan Nguyen
2021. Targets and Sources of Oral Corrective Feedback in English as a Foreign Language Classrooms: Are Students' and Teachers' Beliefs Aligned?. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Ha, Xuan Van, Loc Tan Nguyen & Bui Phu Hung
2021. Oral corrective feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms: A teaching and learning perspective. Heliyon 7:7 ► pp. e07550 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.