Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 167:1 (2016) ► pp. 7897
Ariel, M
(1988) Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24(1), 67–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baek, S
(2012) Processing of English relative clauses by adult L2 learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.Google Scholar
Bley–Vroman, R
(1989) What is the logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, 41, 1–68.Google Scholar
Cook, V
(1997) The consequences of bilingualism for cognitive processing. In A.M.B. de Groot & J.F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 279–299). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Frenck–Mestre, C
(2002) An on-line look at sentence processing in the second language. In R.R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 217–236). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E
(1998) Syntactic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) The dependency locality theory: a distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Y. Miyashita, A.P. Marantz & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain (pp. 95–126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, P.C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M
(2004) Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 97–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guillelmon, D., & Grosjean, F
(2001) The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 29(3), 503–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J.K
(1988) Universals of topic-comment structure. In M. Hammond, E. Moravczik, & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp. 209–239), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J.K, Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R
(1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 691, 274–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haendler, Y., Kliegl, R., & Adani, F
(2015) Discourse accessibility constraints in children’s processing of object relative clauses. Frontiers in psychology, 61, 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A.D
(2001) Processing a second language: Later learners’ comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 123–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H
(2006) Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 22(3), 269–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B.D
(1997) Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 11, pp. 257–268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hoover, M.L. & Dwivedi, V.D
(1998) Syntactic processing by skilled bilinguals. Language Learning, 48(1), 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N
(2004) Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(4), 603–634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57(1), 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A., & Woolley, J.D
(1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kronfeld, A
(1990) Reference and computation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, J. & Kim, H
(2011) The L2 developmental sequence of English constructions and underlying factors. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 11(3), 577–600. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, R., & Nicol, J
(2010) Online processing of anaphora by advanced English learners. In M.T. Prior, Y. Watanabe, & S.-K. Lee (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 150–165). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Omaki, A., & Schulz, B
(2011) Filler-gap dependencies and island constraints in second-language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(4), 563–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L
(2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16(2), 103–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rah, Y–O
(2014) Effects of construction-grammar-based instruction on the sentence production ability of Korean college learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.Google Scholar
Reali, F., & Christiansen, M.H
(2007) Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language,57(1), 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sung, M
(2012) Effects of Instruction on the learning of the English transitive resultative construction by Korean secondary school students. Unpublished MA thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Warren, T., & Gibson, E
(2002) The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognitive, 85(1), 79–112.Google Scholar
Witzel, J., Witzel, N., & Nicol, J
(2012) Deeper than shallow: Evidence for structure-based parsing biases in second-language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 419–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Ro, Eunseok & Hyunwoo Kim
2021. The effects of extensive reading on young Korean students’ construction development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Ro, Eunseok & Hyunwoo Kim
2021. The effects of extensive reading on young Korean students’ construction development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.