Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 167:1 (2016) ► pp.78–97
Vol. 167:1 (2016) ► pp.78–97
The effects of accessibility of English reference in Korean EFL learners’ sentence processing
References (30)
Ariel, M. (1988). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24(1), 67–87. 
Baek, S. (2012). Processing of English relative clauses by adult L2 learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
Bley–Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, 41, 1–68.
Cook, V. (1997). The consequences of bilingualism for cognitive processing. In A.M.B. de Groot & J.F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 279–299). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Frenck–Mestre, C. (2002). An on-line look at sentence processing in the second language. In R.R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 217–236). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Gibson, E. (1998). Syntactic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76.
. (2000). The dependency locality theory: a distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Y. Miyashita, A.P. Marantz & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain (pp. 95–126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gordon, P.C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2004). Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 97–114.
Guillelmon, D., & Grosjean, F. (2001). The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 29(3), 503–511.
Gundel, J.K. (1988). Universals of topic-comment structure. In M. Hammond, E. Moravczik, & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp. 209–239), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gundel, J.K, Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 691, 274–307.
Haendler, Y., Kliegl, R., & Adani, F. (2015). Discourse accessibility constraints in children’s processing of object relative clauses. Frontiers in psychology, 61, 1–17.
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A.D. (2001). Processing a second language: Later learners’ comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 123–141.
Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H. (2006). Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 22(3), 269–301.
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B.D. (1997). Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 11, pp. 257–268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Hoover, M.L. & Dwivedi, V.D. (1998). Syntactic processing by skilled bilinguals. Language Learning, 48(1), 1–29.
Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(4), 603–634.
. (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57(1), 1–33.
Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A., & Woolley, J.D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228–238.
Kronfeld, A. (1990). Reference and computation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, J. & Kim, H. (2011). The L2 developmental sequence of English constructions and underlying factors. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 11(3), 577–600.
Liu, R., & Nicol, J. (2010). Online processing of anaphora by advanced English learners. In M.T. Prior, Y. Watanabe, & S.-K. Lee (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 150–165). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Omaki, A., & Schulz, B. (2011). Filler-gap dependencies and island constraints in second-language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(4), 563–588.
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16(2), 103–133.
Rah, Y–O. (2014). Effects of construction-grammar-based instruction on the sentence production ability of Korean college learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.
Reali, F., & Christiansen, M.H. (2007). Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language,57(1), 1–23.
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33.
Sung, M. (2012). Effects of Instruction on the learning of the English transitive resultative construction by Korean secondary school students. Unpublished MA thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Warren, T., & Gibson, E. (2002). The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognitive, 85(1), 79–112.
Witzel, J., Witzel, N., & Nicol, J. (2012). Deeper than shallow: Evidence for structure-based parsing biases in second-language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 419–456.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Ro, Eunseok & Hyunwoo Kim
2022. The effects of extensive reading on young Korean students’ construction development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4 ► pp. 957 ff. 
Ro, Eunseok & Hyunwoo Kim
2022. The effects of extensive reading on young Korean students’ construction development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4 ► pp. 957 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.